good point about books but this is once again about Takada.
Also, some office worker implying that it would be better to keep it standing is hardly evidence that suggests Pride had tons of fixed fights.
Gary Goodridge did an interview back in 2012 about fixed fights in Pride but i find his claim about 90 procent fixed in the early Pride days hard to believe but even if this was true he further claims that the more recent Pride events are all legit.
His story about Ogawa is a more believable story but then again he refused and lost anyway.
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...e-90-percent-of-early-pride-fights-were-fixed
Allow me to elaborate further.
He didn't say to keep it standing, he said that fans appreciate technique. The "office worker" was one of the promoters, but wasn't named by Kerr in the interview; so it wasn't some intern making photo copies but a decision maker. But as far as what was implied, it could mean anything. Kerr believed they wanted to Kerr to not take down Takada and bludgeon him.
If anything it is putting something in a fighters head, that could cause them to be less aggressive and fight in a way to please the office. Laying on some opponent and doing sweet piss all they are going to book you to fight again in a bigger fight next time around or at all? PRIDE didn't really have much use for Kerr after that.
Mark Kerr thought he was going to fight Royce Gracie for a sum of 150K back when fighters did not make that sort of money. Perhaps because he didn't give the company what they wanted the fight didn't materialize? Takada was devalued even more and Kerr's career went downhill after that bout.
Fights need to be entertaining. I'm not picking on PRIDE and saying all their fights were fixed. There are fighters that are flat out boring with their fighting style. Fights should be entertaining. "Styles make fights" is another way to fix things too. Speaking of Gary Goodridge, in his book he alleges that everything is for sale. If you are to avoid a certain part of the body, you can pay for that ahead of time. He claimed clubs would offer money to one another.
To add to your Gary Goodridge post, he mentions in the book that Sakikbara said that if Goodridge beat Ogawa, he could write his ticket in PRIDE. Goodridge blamed that for getting him so worked up and gassing in the fight.
If you want another case, Rampage Jackson claiming that PRIDE wanted him to fight Sakuraba and lose. But Jackson also says a lot of things. He's someone else I wouldn't trust because he bashes every organization he has ever been a part of and cannot help but complain.
Which was it Rampage? Poisoned or fixed?
http://www.cagedinsider.com/ufc/rampage-jackson-poisoned-sakuraba/
http://fiveouncesofpain.com/2007/06/12/update-on-the-rampage-accusations/