That isn't an original thread either.
That isn't an original thread either.![]()
This.It's extremely simple
The first sample is screened for everything
The second sample is tested for what they found in the other one
It's extremely simple
The first sample is screened for everything
The second sample is tested for what they found in the other one
to put some dye and reactant in a few more bottles takes approx. 1 minute more than to put it in only two. And then to finish testing its all the same, whether its 2 or 200. So no, it makes no sense.It's extremely simple
The first sample is screened for everything
The second sample is tested for what they found in the other one
It's a bit more complicated and rigorous of a test than what you just described, I'm afraidto put some dye and reactant in a few more bottles takes approx. 1 minute more than to put it in only two. And then to finish testing its all the same, whether its 2 or 200. So no, it makes no sense.
It's a bit more complicated and rigorous of a test than what you just described, I'm afraid
if it was that simple all results would come back the same day, and it wouldn't be an expensive process, either.of course it is, but in essence thats it.
Fighters are tested randomly and their samples are sent to the labs for analysis. There is no rush for random sampling. Once a test comes back positive they can simply expedite the 2nd test to verify the first test was valid.
if it was that simple all results would come back the same day, and it wouldn't be an expensive process, either.
Shit like this is serious, and lengthy, and labs will have to follow a pretty thorough set of protocols to make sure samples aren't tainted or damaged, are tested properly, or a million other things. Not only does ALL medical testing take time, they also have a responsibility to the athletes to take their time and do it properly.
Thank you. / threadIt's extremely simple
The first sample is screened for everything
The second sample is tested for what they found in the other one
But it's more original than this one
clippy wins again bitches
LOL at "more original." It's either original or it's not. Clippy fails again!
It's extremely simple
The first sample is screened for everything
The second sample is tested for what they found in the other one
of course it is, but in essence thats it.