- Joined
- Oct 12, 2006
- Messages
- 61,991
- Reaction score
- 16,744
I've seen fourteen million six hundred and five scenarios and they all skeeve me out.Doctor Strange was so confused by their relationship.
I've seen fourteen million six hundred and five scenarios and they all skeeve me out.Doctor Strange was so confused by their relationship.
Everyone has their own agenda, the point is it's not law that all others must abide by or be criminals
was he right about Bucky though? Was he right to stand against the Sokovia accords?(remember that even War Machine now wishes he never signed them). Also of course its in the spirit of Captain America.... its a concept from the comics and Cap was against it in them also. He believes in freedom, and that isnt freedom in his eyes.
also are you really going to mention AoU? you know the movie where Tony unleashes an advanced AI on the world, that almost leads to the entire world being destroyed.
no matter what happens in the MCU..... Cap>>>Iron Man, and he always will be
was he right about Bucky though? Was he right to stand against the Sokovia accords?(remember that even War Machine now wishes he never signed them). Also of course its in the spirit of Captain America.... its a concept from the comics and Cap was against it in them also. He believes in freedom, and that isnt freedom in his eyes.
also are you really going to mention AoU? you know the movie where Tony unleashes an advanced AI on the world, that almost leads to the entire world being destroyed.
no matter what happens in the MCU..... Cap>>>Iron Man, and he always will be
In the Sokovia thing, it kind of was. Black or white.
and why did he not want to create vision? because the last thing Tony and Bruce created was trying to destroy the world as they were doing it. He wasnt wrong in not destroying the mind stone, as that involved just sacrificing a friend without a fight. Cap in any media wouldnt do that.In the Sokovia thing, it kind of was. Black or white.
I'm not debating whether it's in the spirit of the character from the comics. Yes, the main point in comic iteration and the MCU iteration is the same. I'm debating the way it was done, give the entire context and the other actions done by Cap.
In the end, he was right about Bucky. He was wrong on a number of things. He was wrong on Tony, assessing him as a nobody but a human in an armor (which Tony counter-argumented by saving the entire New York City from getting nuked). He was against creating Vision, which kinda turned out OK (otherwise entire Earth population would be screwed). He was wrong in not destroying the mind stone, which wiped out HALF THE GALAXY. He was wrong on so many levels, but I don't need to go further, those three examples are more than enough.
Well, yes, and that was his opposition to it, being codified by governments with agendas rather than the heroes following more what you'd call "guidelines" than actual rules.
and why did he not want to create vision? because the last thing Tony and Bruce created was trying to destroy the world as they were doing it. He wasnt wrong in not destroying the mind stone, as that involved just sacrificing a friend without a fight. Cap in any media wouldnt do that.
Tony has been directly responsible for most of the shit that has went wrong so far, Ultron= Tony, handing the time stone to Thanos by flying short handed to his planet. Yet you just gloss over Tony's faults to shit on Cap?
and why did he not want to create vision? because the last thing Tony and Bruce created was trying to destroy the world as they were doing it. He wasnt wrong in not destroying the mind stone, as that involved just sacrificing a friend without a fight. Cap in any media wouldnt do that.
Tony has been directly responsible for most of the shit that has went wrong so far, Ultron= Tony, handing the time stone to Thanos by flying short handed to his planet. Yet you just gloss over Tony's faults to shit on Cap?
I understand his position. But who's to say heroes' guidelines are good? The same heroes that wrote it? If Cap doesn't believe governmental laws are good bcs they are written by those same governments, how can he be so full of himself and say "I wrote this good, hence it's good". I consider it double standards.
That's why i liked that scene, bcs all sides brought up good points, but in the end, the decision has to be made, and IMO it's black or white, there is no middle ground.
E.g. - Both Tony and Banner feel like crap due to Hulk rampaging throughout the city in AoU. But Tony at least tried to steer the fight away from the city. Cap runs after Brumlow, ends up killing dozens of people in doing so, meh, i don't need to be put in check. Where were the guidelines there?
In the Sokovia thing, it kind of was. Black or white.
I'm not debating whether it's in the spirit of the character from the comics. Yes, the main point in comic iteration and the MCU iteration is the same. I'm debating the way it was done, give the entire context and the other actions done by Cap.
In the end, he was right about Bucky. He was wrong on a number of things. He was wrong on Tony, assessing him as a nobody but a human in an armor (which Tony counter-argumented by saving the entire New York City from getting nuked). He was against creating Vision, which kinda turned out OK (otherwise entire Earth population would be screwed). He was wrong in not destroying the mind stone, which wiped out HALF THE GALAXY. He was wrong on so many levels, but I don't need to go further, those three examples are more than enough.
And in the context of MCU, Iron Man did far more than Cap America and you know it. *tips hat
As far as Tony's faults, I don't gloss over them, and neither does Tony. This is the part where it's not just which character i like the most, it's the part of which character grew the most during the Avengers run. And that's undoubtedly Tony. Tony feels grief, depression, remorse, for all the wrongs he did. He ponders about every decision for days, SOLELY bcs he's made so many bad decisions. I didn't get the notion Cap does the same.
The point is they're not law. If others disagree they dont have to follow it. That's not a double standard unless he's trying to force his way on everyone else
if you think Cap doesnt feel grief or remorse youve not been watching...... he just deals with his issues better than Tony, because he isnt a total flake. He also doesnt make anywhere close to as many bad decisions as Tony. So thats why Tony feels the way he does, its usually his fuck ups that need cleaned up
yeah dude, everyone has an opinion.... but mine is pretty simple. Cap >>> Iron Man when it comes to moral compass. Cap >>>> Iron Man on decision makingIt's clear I won't change your mind(s), and you won't change mine. While "I can go all day", i feel i've driven this thread waaay past it's original content. So, for now, i bid the both of you adiou.
I dont need to ask what team you are do I?So, we're back to arguing about Civil War? Good times.
I dont need to ask what team you are do I?
Haha no sir
I dont need to ask what team you are do I?
Can’t we all just get along?
![]()
OK, my bad, for the insult part.
Back to topic, I didn't say I don't like Cap (as pictured in the MCU) bcs of that. What i dislike the most is his hypocrisy. Great example IMO is the Sokovia accords scene.
He states that he doesn't want ANY REGULATION WHATSOEVER over the Avengers, bcs "the governments have agendas". That's a fair point, to be honest. But not if you have your own agenda (not to mention that Avengers have their own agenda, regardless of it being good or bad), which is to cover for Bucky (just on Bucky's word, bcs why not, he was my friend 60-70 years ago before i became frozen in ace, and before he was subjected to secret supersoldier, superhypnosis, experiments which resulted in him being the most prolific assassin in the world) while keeping it from the group.
He wants to run freely as possible, doing whatever he wants, completely free of charge, regardless of outcomes? That doesn't sound right, and is not in the spirit of Cap America. Yes, i can understand his paranoia in a way that certain things did occur in Winter Soldier, but still.
That was the reasoning behind my "self righteous" statement. He wants to do something on his own, without discussing it with the group, he goes on and does it, thinks nothing of it if someone objects it. He thinks someone else doesn't have to do something, he attacks them immediately. Look at the video above for how he says to Iron Man "You've already made up your mind". Get off your freakin' high horse, IT'S YOU that already made up his mind. Tony/Rhodes/Natasha, hell even Vision all state very good arguments for (at least) discussing the option of giving a certain amount of control to someone. But not Mr Perfect. His attitude is that he is always right, which I believe is inherently wrong, and I cannot say i can think highly of anyone that thinks they are always right.
The "language" bit in the Age of Ultron was another good example. Do as I say, not as I do kind of thing. Well, Iron Man sees right through it and is the only one not afraid to call him up on it. OK, that one is a weaker argument, maybe i'm reading too much into that tiny bit.
if you think Cap doesnt feel grief or remorse youve not been watching...... he just deals with his issues better than Tony, because he isnt a total flake. He also doesnt make anywhere close to as many bad decisions as Tony. So thats why Tony feels the way he does, its usually his fuck ups that need cleaned up