- Joined
- Jun 13, 2016
- Messages
- 655
- Reaction score
- 0
So we have all seen it, before every fight if someone has a longer reach, the announcers will of course declare it as a reach advantage. The reason is clear as well, easier to keep your opponent at bay, maintain safe distance and land blows from outside of the opponent's reach.
When does this become a disadvantage though? Is a lanky guy easier to tie up on the ground? Those long arms must be quite hard to get free if your opponent has them pinned down well. Also the leverages will make it very strenuous to your muscles.
What about if your reach is considerable longer than your opponent's and the shorter reach opponent keeps fighting in the pocket? You couldn't throw any meaningful shots if you are cramped up like an NBA player in a smart car.
When does this become a disadvantage though? Is a lanky guy easier to tie up on the ground? Those long arms must be quite hard to get free if your opponent has them pinned down well. Also the leverages will make it very strenuous to your muscles.
What about if your reach is considerable longer than your opponent's and the shorter reach opponent keeps fighting in the pocket? You couldn't throw any meaningful shots if you are cramped up like an NBA player in a smart car.