Are dinosaur bones radioactive?

[Lex Bigelow]

They are indeed.

 

[Agent Mulder's Hair]

This is the first I've heard of it. Ancient Aliens isn't exactly a credible source. Is there any source that is not a retarded show which says they are?

Oh I know. But I googled it and a lot of stuff came up. Seems legit. From what I've read so far, some aren't radioactive, but many are. And some are highly radioactive.



http://preparation.paleo.amnh.org/66/radiation

https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/30075/are-all-dinosaur-bones-radioactive

https://www.quora.com/Why-are-some-dinosaur-bones-covered-in-heavily-leaded-paint

https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/tbevp/why_are_some_dinosaur_fossils_radioactive/

https://earthscience.rice.edu/2015/...es-and-agates-in-the-western-interior-seaway/

http://www.dinosaurhome.com/radioactivity-in-fossils-195662.html

 

[Agent Mulder's Hair]

For some reason this gal kept popping up on my news feed (facebook) today. This thread reminded me of it

I wonder what her source is for saying that the first dino fossil was discovered AFTER they'd already hypothesized what dinosaurs were and what they were supposed to look like.




Edit: ok I went down the rabbit hole with those videos, who that girl is, what her group is, and what a Poe is. Crazy story.

 

[jefferz]

Little known fact: God used heavy water for the deluge.

 

[DIABOLUS]

I've heard the theory about dinos evolving into modern day birds. And I can see it, sort of. But I always thought of dinos as more like crocodiles than pigeons, ya know?

With T Rex's and Raptors and of course pterodactyls I can see it. But what about Brontosauruses and Triceratops? Nothing birdlike at all about those things. It's wild how little we actually know about dinosaurs.

Different branches of the family tree. You can see in this diagram Therapods (as mentioned previously, which evolved into birds) is just of many branches of dinosaurs. The other branches were likely weeded out due to inefficiency (larger food requirements), climate change, inability to adapt quickly enough, etc. Of course other non-dinosaur species such as fish, sharks, crocodiles, and insects like cockroaches were also able to survive into the present day relatively unchanged. So they were also efficient designs.

 

[ShinkanPo]

Scyther is where I got the info that fossils and dinosaur skeletons were made of melted down chicken bones. It's like a veil was lifted from my eyes! Everything became crystal clear afterwards.

Wait did Scyther really said that? @Scyther

Have you ever heard about the Happeh theory on Anorexia

 

[ShinkanPo]

You have more patience for that shit than I do.

When someone has the opportunity to contribute something meaningful and insightful and they instead choose to waste that opportunity for a stab at cheap humor, I find that very frustrating.

We may not get allong very well then I am one of the corny posters in sherdogs. Lol.

 

[Guestx]

We may not get allong very well then I am one of the corny posters in sherdogs. Lol.

LOL. Maybe for you I'll make an exception.

 

[Prefect]

It's really rare, there's only a hand full of examples.


They've found Trex soft tissue
https://www.livescience.com/41537-t-rex-soft-tissue.html

Dinosaur feather

https://blogs.scientificamerican.co...nk-of-feathered-dinosaur-discovered-in-amber/

Scientist know dinosaurs had feathers or some did at least. It is hard to unwind the narrative that they all were scaly lizards.

 

[Agent Mulder's Hair]

It's a lie. Museums (according to their own sources) do not put the real bones out to be potentially touched by the public and what's really out there are fake molds. Also, if the bones were really radioactive then handling the bones would be limited for actual paleontologists because they could be at a higher risk of cancer.

I dunno dude. The first link here is specifically about the precautions workers and scientists should take when dealing with radioactive fossils. It's from the American Museum of Natural History. The other links have good info too, though.



http://preparation.paleo.amnh.org/66/radiation

https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/30075/are-all-dinosaur-bones-radioactive

https://www.quora.com/Why-are-some-dinosaur-bones-covered-in-heavily-leaded-paint

https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/tbevp/why_are_some_dinosaur_fossils_radioactive/

https://earthscience.rice.edu/2015/...es-and-agates-in-the-western-interior-seaway/

http://www.dinosaurhome.com/radioactivity-in-fossils-195662.html

Currently I'm on the bandwagon of Dinosaurs never existed and are just a fabrication used to push the evolution lie. The thing with all these hoaxes is they'll add multiple layers to a hoax just to make it more confusing and difficult to get to the core of the truth, it appears this lie about radiation is just part of the hoax to add another layer and make things just a bit more complicated so people will be too intimidated to look into the matter of dinosaur fossils.

It honestly wouldn't surprise me

 

[Kframe]

Fossils aren't bones, contrary to popular belief.

The linked article above says otherwise.

 

[Jack Reacheround]

Oh I know. But I googled it and a lot of stuff came up. Seems legit. From what I've read so far, some aren't radioactive, but many are. And some are highly radioactive.



http://preparation.paleo.amnh.org/66/radiation

https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/30075/are-all-dinosaur-bones-radioactive

https://www.quora.com/Why-are-some-dinosaur-bones-covered-in-heavily-leaded-paint

https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/tbevp/why_are_some_dinosaur_fossils_radioactive/

https://earthscience.rice.edu/2015/...es-and-agates-in-the-western-interior-seaway/

http://www.dinosaurhome.com/radioactivity-in-fossils-195662.html

That's crazy. I never knew this.

 

[Scyther]

Wait did Scyther really said that? @Scyther

Have you ever heard about the Happeh theory on Anorexia

Scyther is where I got the info that fossils and dinosaur skeletons were made of melted down chicken bones. It's like a veil was lifted from my eyes! Everything became crystal clear afterwards.

The chicken bones only work for smaller sized dinosaurs obviously. And here's a source, the Chinese are faking dinosaurs left and right and making big bucks off of it.

1) Using real materials (bones, teeth, body parts) to embed in glue, resin and plaster to create a complete fake fossil composite on a slab or piece of matrix. (i.e. using modern chicken or frog bones glued to matrix to make various skeleton fossils).

Scientists even fall for the fakes.

More troubling, even scientists have fallen prey to the extraordinary craftsmanship of the Chinese fake fossil artists. In 1999, highly recognized scientists along with National Geographic magazine presented an amazing new discovery of a feathered dinosaur discovered in the Liaoning Province of China. The bird with a dinosaur's tail was named ARCHAEORAPTOR. A year later, it was found to be a clever fake.

https://www.paleodirect.com/fake-chinese-fossils-fossil-forgery-from-china/

 

[Kframe]

It's a lie. Museums (according to their own sources) do not put the real bones out to be potentially touched by the public and what's really out there are fake molds. Also, if the bones were really radioactive then handling the bones would be limited for actual paleontologists because they could be at a higher risk of cancer.

Currently I'm on the bandwagon of Dinosaurs never existed and are just a fabrication used to push the evolution lie. The thing with all these hoaxes is they'll add multiple layers to a hoax just to make it more confusing and difficult to get to the core of the truth, it appears this lie about radiation is just part of the hoax to add another layer and make things just a bit more complicated so people will be too intimidated to look into the matter of dinosaur fossils.

LOL you just cant be a flat earth science denier, but your anti dinosaur now? That is a god damned riot!
What makes your trolls so awesome is that no matter what science people use to refute your wildly ridiculous claims you just brush them off as if they were faked, completely refusing to acknowledge the scientific facts presented to you..

Keep it up mate, your thread are a laugh riot!

 

[Scyther]

I dunno dude. The first link here is specifically about the precautions workers and scientists should take when dealing with radioactive fossils. It's from the American Museum of Natural History. The other links have good info too, though.



http://preparation.paleo.amnh.org/66/radiation

https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/30075/are-all-dinosaur-bones-radioactive

https://www.quora.com/Why-are-some-dinosaur-bones-covered-in-heavily-leaded-paint

https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/tbevp/why_are_some_dinosaur_fossils_radioactive/

https://earthscience.rice.edu/2015/...es-and-agates-in-the-western-interior-seaway/

http://www.dinosaurhome.com/radioactivity-in-fossils-195662.html





It honestly wouldn't surprise me

So tell me before all of this information what steps were the original dinosaur hunters taking to avoid radiation poisoning? They weren't taking any precautions whatsoever and they turned out just fine. I'm telling you this is just another lie. In a few years people are going to be throwing out this fake factoid about paleontologists needing to take precautions to avoid radiation.

 

[fdswer]

It's a lie. Museums (according to their own sources) do not put the real bones out to be potentially touched by the public and what's really out there are fake molds. Also, if the bones were really radioactive then handling the bones would be limited for actual paleontologists because they could be at a higher risk of cancer.

Currently I'm on the bandwagon of Dinosaurs never existed and are just a fabrication used to push the evolution lie. The thing with all these hoaxes is they'll add multiple layers to a hoax just to make it more confusing and difficult to get to the core of the truth, it appears this lie about radiation is just part of the hoax to add another layer and make things just a bit more complicated so people will be too intimidated to look into the matter of dinosaur fossils.

Ho fuck you're self

 

[Scyther]

LOL you just cant be a flat earth science denier, but your anti dinosaur now? That is a god damned riot!
What makes your trolls so awesome is that no matter what science people use to refute your wildly ridiculous claims you just brush them off as if they were faked, completely refusing to acknowledge the scientific facts presented to you..

Keep it up mate, your thread are a laugh riot!

This is no joke, I only ask you give this documentary a try before you laugh off the idea of fake dinosaurs.

 

[Scyther]

That's crazy. I never knew this.

Don't believe this lie, what proof have these guys shown you? What precautions did the original dinosaur hunters take to avoid contamination? It's almost like this garbage was just made up recently.

 

[Kframe]

This is no joke, I only ask you give this documentary a try before you laugh off the idea of fake dinosaurs.

I watched it before in your flat earth science denial thread. It made good points about SOME fossils being faked, as that is shit have heard about in the news, but it didn't in anyway convince me they as a species were fake in their entirety.

 

[Jack Reacheround]

Don't believe this lie, what proof have these guys shown you? What precautions did the original dinosaur hunters take to avoid contamination? It's almost like this garbage was just made up recently.

Bitch, leave.