Law Appelate Judges decimate Leticia James and Judge Edgeron verdict against Trump

[Scerpi]

Another Lawfare case against Trump is falling apart. Judges are basically stating common sense for anyone who doesn’t have Stage 4 TDS.

Get ready for the triggering

New Doubts About Trump’s Fraud Verdict​

Appellate judges say New York Attorney General Letitia James may have exceeded her legal authority.​

https://www.wsj.com/opinion/new-doubts-about-trumps-fraud-verdict-ag-letitia-james-appellate-judges-3e0a999e

A five-judge appellate panel on Thursday heard Mr. Trump’s appeal of a lower-court judge’s penalty for allegedly inflating the value of his real-estate assets to obtain better loan terms. Ms. James’s lawsuit was unusual since nobody claimed to be harmed by the former President’s alleged legerdemain, which is ordinarily required in fraud cases.

Several appellate judges noted as much. “I’m sorry, what’s being described sounds an awful lot like a potential commercial dispute between private actors,” Justice John Higgitt noted. It seems, he mused, that the AG is “going into an area that wasn’t intended for her jurisdiction.” He suggested the court may need to impose “guardrails” on the AG’s power.


Holy shit… that last line.

 

[Scerpi]

lol… Jack Smith fails and now this

 

[MacGregor]

What's next, James for mayor?
Rhetorical question.

 

[Scerpi]

What's next, James for mayor?
Rhetorical question.

Corrupt mayor, corrupt AG, corrupt judge

Like Mayor Adams said

New York has a brand

 

[CantCucktheTuck]

Imagine being one of the shertifa bros, endlessly posting for 100s of pages, about "felon Trump".

how embarrassing.....

 

[pv3Hpv3p]

I always thought it was a little fishy when the company he allegedly defrauded said they had no issues and would happily work with him again... but I guess James had virtue and righteousness on her side...

 

[Err]

This will be an optics nightmare if it’s overturned before the election.

 

[Scerpi]

This will be an optics nightmare if it’s overturned before the election.

Trump could sue any media company calling him a felon after

 

[Scerpi]

The 91 inditments thread is almost down to zero…

Lol

 

[Dalarna3]

I wouldn’t be surprised if they order a retrial and it gets dropped if he wins.

 

[nhbbear]

I am telling you that besides something personal, letitia james is using trump to boost her to something besides her post. I called it years ago that she would run for governor and she did, but then dropped out before the race really got going. I can’t say it enough, I hate trump, but I don’t like this bitch either because I don’t feel her efforts are genuine.

 

[Kingz]

 

[cottagecheesefan]

Had posted the entire hearing last week. Was definetly a beat down, dunno how they won’t overturn it after the hearing and the reactions it got, as evident by your OP.

The “rape” case will also be clearly overturned, as will the stormy Daniel’s case. As said from the start, anyone who believes these biased cases is a certified Moran

The appeal judges are just waiting to rule so they don’t get hounded by radical left freaks who would say they are Trump supporters for their decision

Found a video of the hearings yeaterday. Starts 14minutes into it. If you go to 35min in, the NY lawyer is trying to make their case and for ten+ minutes the judges are just like this case is nothing like the cases you cite lol

 

[misterfurious]

Anyone with a shred of common sense, and not afflicted with TDS, could see this was going to get tossed.

 

[CantCucktheTuck]

Anyone with a shred of common sense, and not afflicted with TDS, could see this was going to get tossed.

Elections - Trump Indicted On 91 Counts

You're voting for Kamala and acting like you have the high ground? There's no shame in the anti-Establishment Orange Man choice with the alternative being the Marxist Kamala Harris and the Democrats / Globalists war mongers. lol, how is Kamala a Marxist ? Does she support having the...

forums.sherdog.com

Lot of those tards here

 

[ColemanwastheGOAT]

We all knew these were going to get thrown out.

 

[HOLA]

We all know Trump inflated the value of his properties. It's not debatable and there is no gray area. When Maro Lardo was assessed at $20-30 million, he was fine with it when it helped him pay less in taxes, then claimed it was worth something ridiculous he pulled out of his ass when it came time to securing cheaper loans.

None of you cult members think he's actually innocent, you just want to see him get away with his crimes so liberals will be angry.

The issue of who were the victims was addressed in court.

1. Trump paid less for the loans than he otherwise would have if he were honest.
2. The banks only have so much to loan out. Trump dishonestly received funds that could have gone to an honest businessperson.

As for the banks claiming they were happy with him...no. They found an employee, which they paid, who agreed to state this in court. But the fact remains the bank banned Trump. Does that sound like they're happy? Obviously not.

 

[kenetics]

Maga can never accept Trumps faults lol

 

[HOLA]

Also, I'm not lawyer, but IIRC @Darkballs and @panamaican are?

As far as I know it's erroneous to draw conclusions from appellate oral arguments? They ask tough questions , throw out curveballs, act skeptical and apply pressure on purpose to see how well your arguments stand up against it.

 

[ColemanwastheGOAT]

Also, I'm not lawyer, but IIRC @Darkballs and @panamaican are?

As far as I know it's erroneous to draw conclusions from appellate oral arguments? They ask tough questions , throw out curveballs, act skeptical and apply pressure on purpose to see how well your arguments stand up against it.

Stop panicking. It's embarassing.