- Joined
- Nov 1, 2017
- Messages
- 596
- Reaction score
- 922
I mean i liked it better when he was around cause hed usually ask the sharp questions but its not like it was the HL of the event.
Great contribution. I especially loved your reasoning.
Ariel is banned for a reason. He’s not a dude who will tow the company line in order to be “allowed” to cover the sport. He’s banned from covering UFC events on site and yet is still the biggest and most influential MMA journalist out there. That’s insane.
Ariel is far from perfect but the larger point stands - for all of it's chest-thumping about freedom if speech, UFC has always been blatantly censoring what fighters / coaches / cutmen / journalists say about the sport and the organization.
I've asked a few times what exactly these hard questions are and have never gotten an answer. Ariel asked things like "What's it like getting knocked out in front of your family?"
"I feel like 90% of the questions are almost pre-approved by the UFC in advance."
Some of them are just approved in advance as opposed to being pre-approved in advance, and a few are pre-approved after the press conference.
Watch the presser for Jones vs Gus 2, where Ariel asked Jones, Dana, and Gus about Jones' failed tests and how they know he is still clean. There's an example
So one cutting question also stirring up drama since Gus was there
There are some good MMA reporters/journalists among the herd, but the majority of these Dana White post-fight scrums are just brutal to watch.
I feel like 90% of the questions are almost pre-approved by the UFC in advance and are softball questions fo Dana. They start with "Dana, how excited are you for..." or "Dana, talk about the success of how much the UFC has grown..."
Ariel was the only one that consistently challenged Dana and asked hard questions that we wanted to hear the answers to
Ariel Bless.