Anyone else have Nate winning the first round?

yaikr

White Belt
@White
Joined
Apr 27, 2015
Messages
135
Reaction score
0
Rewatched the fight.

In terms of shots landed, guaranteed Nate pointed him.

Mcgregor landed a few bombs, arguably more 'damage'(whatever the fuck that means). But that cut makes it look a lot worse than it actually was.

IMO, Mcgregor really looked sharp in the first 90 seconds of the second round. You know, till he got KO'ed on his feet.
 
I did. Basically even striking, Nate scored a TD and Conor grabbed the fence to save his bum life.

image.jpg
 
I did, it was close, but nate landed better shots and had more ring control.
 
For sure Diaz won the first, his boxing was more effective + the TD, I knew the finish was going to be soon after seeing how much better Nate's striking was.
 
I don't think so but it was way closer than people think it was.
 
lol no, clearly Conors round
 
Conor won the first round
which means nothing
 
Fight metric had McGregor landing more shots, AND he did far more damage in the first.

There's no way to score that round for Diaz.

The very first thing you should be scoring the round based on is "Effective striking". Who had more effective striking? McGregor landed a higher %, more total punches, and did more damage.
 
Hell no, Conor played with him in the 1st IMO.
 
I had Nate winning. Conor was clearly the one that did more damage but Nate was tagging him and Conor was missing a lot. Don't listen to Rogan and Mike Goldberg.
 
I felt Diaz won the first round but it was close. McGregor landed almost nothing in the 1st, even though Diaz got cut. Close round I would say but honestly, at the end I felt I would have given that round to Diaz.
 
Conor was just walking him down the whole time until he got hurt, there is no doubt who was winning that fight until...
 
Rewatched the fight.

In terms of shots landed, guaranteed Nate pointed him.

Mcgregor landed a few bombs, arguably more 'damage'(whatever the fuck that means). But that cut makes it look a lot worse than it actually was.

IMO, Mcgregor really looked sharp in the first 90 seconds of the second round. You know, till he got KO'ed on his feet.
Nah, i just knew he wouldnt be finished. I did call Tate winning though. MMA beats boxer everytime.
 
Also had Nate winning, rewatched and I still have Nate 10-9. Very close round.
 
Props to Nate for avoid a lot of spinning kicks
 
I gave it to Conor but that had more to do with the cut like you said. He cut pretty quick, most likely due to not allowing his face heal completely from the MJ fight
 
Conor barely won the first. With the TD it could of been a draw. Conor fans had it 10-8. Rational people 10-9 or 10-10. Casuals are unaware of the Diaz bros scar tissue issue.
 
Back
Top