Anyone care to make an actual decent argument for Wonderboy winning?

TheShockmaster

Brown Belt
@Brown
Joined
Dec 4, 2012
Messages
2,528
Reaction score
618
I've been through over 100 posts saying Wonderboy won but I'm get to see an actual argument formed that isn't just "the media agree" or similar. I haven't watched back yet, but in the arena I gave Till rounds 2, 4 and 5. Till threw more, landed more, had the only knockdown and had the better octagon of the control. Statistically the only thing Wonderboy did better was body shots.

I find it amazing this is a decision people are upset by and no one is really making any points to form an argument that makes any sense. Is it because it was his home town and people hate to see a UK fighter get any deicision or are people more just upset that he missed weight so have a bias because of that?
 
Draw until the knockdown which gave the fight to Till.

People are just bitching because he missed weight.
 
Nobody deserved to win this sparring session.
 
I hate to say it but Till won that fight clearly.
 
Because Till missed weight and should therefor lose close rounds. 49-46 Thompson
 
Every pro fighter, commentator etc.. I've seen talk about it said they felt like WB won. He landed the cleaner shots for the majority of the fight.
 
Idk who won but I'll bite just for the sake of the thread. Till did land more but he also missed more. He also failed to cut off the octagon 99.9% of the time. Only cut it off effectively twice, one of those being a knock down and the other one he disengaged and then smiled at WB. He essentially let WB circle around the entire time, this is where I fault WB for not working the body, slipping when Till tries to counter upstairs, and then circling around. Overall, Both of them should have increased their output. None of them clearly dominated the other. I thought it was gonna be a draw mostly, or split decision WB, or WB UD but that was cause I forgot they were in the uk.
 
Nope wonderboy fans cant see through their salty tears still
 
I haven’t watched the fight back either,so this is just my impression from the night.

Till’s ‘significant strikes’ in rounds 1-4 were mainly pitty pat leg kicks whilst Wonderboy’s were clean counters that Till either acknowledged with a head shake or ‘good shot’.

Round 5 clearly went to Till, I may have given him one more but can’t remember.
 
Because Till missed weight and should therefor lose close rounds. 49-46 Thompson
Makes you wonder if Till would have been able to eat those shots if he wasn't like 20lbs heavier than Wonderboy. Also that shot probably wouldn't have even dropped Wonderboy.
 
Till landed nothing outside a couple leg kicks and ate clean punches all night
 
I've been through over 100 posts saying Wonderboy won but I'm get to see an actual argument formed that isn't just "the media agree" or similar. I haven't watched back yet, but in the arena I gave Till rounds 2, 4 and 5. Till threw more, landed more, had the only knockdown and had the better octagon of the control. Statistically the only thing Wonderboy did better was body shots.

I find it amazing this is a decision people are upset by and no one is really making any points to form an argument that makes any sense. Is it because it was his home town and people hate to see a UK fighter get any deicision or are people more just upset that he missed weight so have a bias because of that?
You fucking dick. Watch it back first before starting a thread about it.
 
Till’s ‘significant strikes’ in rounds 1-4 were mainly pitty pat leg kicks whilst Wonderboy’s were clean counters that Till either acknowledged with a head shake or ‘good shot’.

Tills ‘pitty pat leg kicks’ caused more damage than any of WB’s ‘clean counters’.
 
Nobody deserved to win this sparring session.

That's kind of what I was thinking . . . right up there with the worst main events I've watched.
 
Till won the fight, WB won the sporting event. Depends on how you see it. I give it to Till.
Neither guy did amazing so can't be mad at any result honestly.
 
It really was a non-event of a fight. You can't dismiss the only signifcant thing to happen (the knockdown) as the deciding factor.
 
Makes you wonder if Till would have been able to eat those shots if he wasn't like 20lbs heavier than Wonderboy. Also that shot probably wouldn't have even dropped Wonderboy.
Lol wishful thinking
 
I did not see any argument for Till winning any rounds but the 5th.

Wonderboy did not shine. His arguments were not strong. But he landed the better shots stil throughout at least round 2-4. I had the first round a draw.

Neither did a whole lot. But WB did a little more and won moire rounds in my book.

Why don't you provide what won Till any round beside the last?

Dismissing the media argument does not get you anywhere. In fact it just proves that you are in the minority and there is a reason for it.

The fight was not very good but imo Wonderboy had it. But after that fight I don't really care.
 
Back
Top