- Joined
- Dec 4, 2012
- Messages
- 2,528
- Reaction score
- 618
I've been through over 100 posts saying Wonderboy won but I'm get to see an actual argument formed that isn't just "the media agree" or similar. I haven't watched back yet, but in the arena I gave Till rounds 2, 4 and 5. Till threw more, landed more, had the only knockdown and had the better octagon of the control. Statistically the only thing Wonderboy did better was body shots.
I find it amazing this is a decision people are upset by and no one is really making any points to form an argument that makes any sense. Is it because it was his home town and people hate to see a UK fighter get any deicision or are people more just upset that he missed weight so have a bias because of that?
I find it amazing this is a decision people are upset by and no one is really making any points to form an argument that makes any sense. Is it because it was his home town and people hate to see a UK fighter get any deicision or are people more just upset that he missed weight so have a bias because of that?