• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Law Another Canadian Justice System Story

What kind of a lawless nation is this?:

https://www.ctvnews.ca/vancouver/ar...rash-that-killed-toddler-will-not-face-new-tr

The judge in the case determined that Moshfeghi Zadeh was inattentive and that his manner of driving was dangerous, but that his “momentary lapse” of attention did not constitute a “marked departure” from the standard of care required, and therefore was not a criminal offence.

Pretty much...guy runs red lights with ample time to see it. Smashes into SUV which collides into a man holding his toddler daughter. She dies and he is seriously injured. The driver found not guilty.

Uhhh!?

So you are allowed to run red lights and cause the death of a toddler and have no serious consequence. Oh wait, you can decaptitate then cannibalize people and be set free with a new identity here, so hell ya. You can be a serial killer and be released to start a new family, so ya.

These kind of decisions are so frequent here you become numb to it and just come to expect it.

Sounds like you guys need to start voting in your own best interest
 


 
Last edited:



Thanks for posting this. Keean Bexte broke what I consider to be the biggest story in Canada of my lifetime.


The October 2019 Military World Games in Wuhan may have been an intentional super-spreader event.

Here is evidence that the Canadian military was aware (on 22 January 2020 according to the date on the document) of potential exposure of Canadian soldiers to novel coronavirus at the October 2019 (before the first officially recognized case on 17 November 2019, first reported on 31 December 2019) Military World games in Wuhan China, which had been evacuated ostensibly for the games.
https://www.rebelnews.com/covid_coverup_trudeau_govt_helped_china_hide_origins_of_covid_19

Here is the 22 January 2002 document signed by the former Surgeon General Canada:


Here is some corroborating evidence from the Washington Post that Wuhan was evacuated for the games and atheletes got sick: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...opinions&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter
In October 2019, more than 9,000 international athletes from more than 100 countries traveled to Wuhan, China — and many of them later got sick with covid-19-like symptoms. But there has never been a real investigation into whether the virus that causes covid-19 was already spreading at the Wuhan Military World Games. Now, multiple U.S. lawmakers are demanding the U.S. government begin one.

The Military World Games, which are held every four years, are like the Olympics for military athletes. The games in Wuhan were the largest in the event’s history, and the Chinese government went all out. The U.S. delegation came with 280 athletes and staff representing 17 sports, ranging from wrestling to golf. (Team USA brought home the bronze in the latter competition.) During the two-week event, however, many of the international athletes noticed that something was amiss in the city of Wuhan. Some later described it as a “ghost town.”

As the covid-19 pandemic took hold worldwide in early 2020, athletes from several countries — including France, Germany, Italy and Luxembourg — claimed publicly they had contracted what they believed to be covid-19 at the games in Wuhan, based on their symptoms and how their illnesses spread to their loved ones. In Washington, military leaders either dismissed the idea out of hand or weren’t aware of it. Meanwhile, no one performed any antibody testing or disease tracing on these thousands of athletes. No one even attempted to find out whether the games in Wuhan was, in fact, the first international pandemic superspreader event. ...
[/quote]
 
Last edited:
Im just surprised the father in vaughn killed infront of his 2 kids and wife hasn't made it up here yet .
 
Im just surprised the father in vaughn killed infront of his 2 kids and wife hasn't made it up here yet .
Here is a news link: https://ca.news.yahoo.com/ontario-father-46-shot-dead-161150633.html

When "targeted" is used to describe a crime, I usually think that this means one criminal shooting another criminal acquaintance, and this is reassuring to people who are not criminals.

But targeted is used differently in this article:
'While the release said “this is being treated as a targeted incident,” police sources explained to the Toronto Sun that this meant a home that was targeted for robbery purposes. It is believed the victim was not specifically targeted but the home was.'

So, if you run a successful business and live in a nice house then you should not be reassured.
 
Here is a news link: https://ca.news.yahoo.com/ontario-father-46-shot-dead-161150633.html

When "targeted" is used to describe a crime, I usually think that this means one criminal shooting another criminal acquaintance, and this is reassuring to people who are not criminals.

But targeted is used differently in this article:
'While the release said “this is being treated as a targeted incident,” police sources explained to the Toronto Sun that this meant a home that was targeted for robbery purposes. It is believed the victim was not specifically targeted but the home was.'

So, if you run a successful business and live in a nice house then you should not be reassured.
Oh don't worry there will be a bunch of liberal fucking losers hoping in here soon to tell u crime is no worse.

Targeted is a hilarious way to describe it.
 
No, It was just such a lame assed troll attempt. If you're going to take the time, put in the effort.
Please. The first post of this thread says it all. But my post was trolling. Yeah okay.
 
I don’t understand this post at all. Under separation of powers judges have the power of the judiciary, meaning the power to interpret and apply the law, no more and no less. Not exactly sure how you view them as having “too much power” - what do you feel is the appropriate amount of power they should have?

As for a “standard they should all be held to” what does this mean? What standards? For what?

I can only speak for British judges; roughly 75 - 80% of them are senile old farts, so out of touch with reality they could run for US President if they'd been born in America.

The remainder...well, let's just say you really wouldn't want them babysitting your children...:eek:
 
Foreigners get a separate set of rules in Canada to protect their precious immigration status.

There’s been multiple counts of them molesting kids and getting favorable sentences so they don’t get deported. Meanwhile we get arrested and charged for defending our homes against armed intruders.

This country is really fucked up.
 
I don’t understand this post at all. Under separation of powers judges have the power of the judiciary, meaning the power to interpret and apply the law, no more and no less. Not exactly sure how you view them as having “too much power” - what do you feel is the appropriate amount of power they should have?

As for a “standard they should all be held to” what does this mean? What standards? For what?
Too much power is allowing criminals to commit crimes with no consequences because of their own personal politics. They're basically accessories to these crimes.
 
I can only speak for British judges; roughly 75 - 80% of them are senile old farts, so out of touch with reality they could run for US President if they'd been born in America.

The remainder...well, let's just say you really wouldn't want them babysitting your children...:eek:
I feel as though the appropriate age to be a judge should be between 40-60. Same with politics and certain other areas which pertain to law. Anything younger than 40 is too inexperienced. Anything older than 60 is just too old. You have a 20 year career. Mandatory 2 months off every year to reduce burnout. If a woman...cant judge on menstrual cycle cause it may effect decision, especially when judging men. All judges should have to go through testing every 2 years to make sure they are in the right state of mind and if anything tragic or health related issues befall them, they should instantly be reassessed.

Much like surgeons, your life is literally in their hands. We need to be very strict with not only who is appointed but also keeping up with regular checks to make sure they are still capable to judge.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top