• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Law Another Canadian Justice System Story

Ezekiel 25:17

Red Belt
@red
Joined
May 15, 2016
Messages
8,612
Reaction score
9,314
What kind of a lawless nation is this?:

https://www.ctvnews.ca/vancouver/ar...rash-that-killed-toddler-will-not-face-new-tr

The judge in the case determined that Moshfeghi Zadeh was inattentive and that his manner of driving was dangerous, but that his “momentary lapse” of attention did not constitute a “marked departure” from the standard of care required, and therefore was not a criminal offence.

Pretty much...guy runs red lights with ample time to see it. Smashes into SUV which collides into a man holding his toddler daughter. She dies and he is seriously injured. The driver found not guilty.

Uhhh!?

So you are allowed to run red lights and cause the death of a toddler and have no serious consequence. Oh wait, you can decaptitate then cannibalize people and be set free with a new identity here, so hell ya. You can be a serial killer and be released to start a new family, so ya.

These kind of decisions are so frequent here you become numb to it and just come to expect it.
 
Last edited:
Sad story. Not sure it’s thread worthy. Doubt it’s worth making it into a racial issue. But this is Sherfront. What was i thinking.
 
Hopefully if/when the time comes that cucknadians have had enough they remember the names of the judges, lawyers, advocates, and politicians who insisted we live in a society that enables criminals and punishes victims. Never forget they wanted your kids to live among murders, rapists, drug addicts, etc.
 
It sounds like a liberal l left wing judge.

Sound like it meet this definition and is definitely a crime.

" Canada, "involuntary manslaughter" isn't a defined legal term but refers to manslaughter caused by criminal negligence or an unlawful act without intent to cause death. It involves a death occurring due to someone's reckless, dangerous, or unlawful behaviour, even if they didn't intend to kill. Examples include causing a death while driving recklessly, negligently operating machinery, or an accidental discharge of a firearm. The charge falls under Section 234 of the Criminal Code and can result in a maximum sentence of life imprisonment, with mandatory minimum sentences if a firearm is involved. "
 
It sounds like a liberal l left wing judge.

Sound like it meet this definition and is definitely a crime.

" Canada, "involuntary manslaughter" isn't a defined legal term but refers to manslaughter caused by criminal negligence or an unlawful act without intent to cause death. It involves a death occurring due to someone's reckless, dangerous, or unlawful behaviour, even if they didn't intend to kill. Examples include causing a death while driving recklessly, negligently operating machinery, or an accidental discharge of a firearm. The charge falls under Section 234 of the Criminal Code and can result in a maximum sentence of life imprisonment, with mandatory minimum sentences if a firearm is involved. "
I may not have all the details. But it doesn’t look like the person was speeding or impaired. Not that those are the only reason for recklessness. There are probably almost daily deaths due to vehicle accidents that didn’t have speeding, impairment or other aggravating circumstances. We should have regular threads on this.
 
Sad story. Not sure it’s thread worthy. Doubt it’s worth making it into a racial issue. But this is Sherfront. What was i thinking.

Who made it into a racial issue?

You are right...i should have made another Trump thread or a thread about my disdain for gay cheerleaders. My bad.
 
Last edited:
I may not have all the details. But it doesn’t look like the person was speeding or impaired. Not that those are the only reason for recklessness. There are probably almost daily deaths due to vehicle accidents that didn’t have speeding, impairment or other aggravating circumstances. We should have regular threads on this.

He apparently ran 2-3 red lights before the crash. The last one turned red 20 seconds before he hit the intersection. Thats wreckless, negligent driving. There are street lights for a reason. Cause he wasnt speeding is a non issue here.

See how ridiculous that sounds? He ran the red light but he wasnt speeding or drinking so its ok.

These judges need hard smacks or public lashings.
 
Canada is a fairly obvious case of an apathetic society and the problems that can arise from it. The people under 30 are a different story though.
 
Judges have way too much power. There should be a standard that they're all held to, and they should be imprisoned if they deviate from it.

I don’t understand this post at all. Under separation of powers judges have the power of the judiciary, meaning the power to interpret and apply the law, no more and no less. Not exactly sure how you view them as having “too much power” - what do you feel is the appropriate amount of power they should have?

As for a “standard they should all be held to” what does this mean? What standards? For what?
 
I don’t understand this post at all. Under separation of powers judges have the power of the judiciary, meaning the power to interpret and apply the law, no more and no less. Not exactly sure how you view them as having “too much power” - what do you feel is the appropriate amount of power they should have?

As for a “standard they should all be held to” what does this mean? What standards? For what?
How about accountability. When a judge releases a multiple time repeat offender who goes on to commit more crimes and especially murder, rape, and other serious crimes there should be some accountability.
 
Back
Top