Economy Anheuser-Busch loses more than $5 billion in value amid Dylan Mulvaney Bud Light controversy

[James Bomb]

That does not make him guilty of Russian hacking bud, that makes those people guilty of lying.

They lied about their conversations with foreign intelligence agents that are the enemies of the United States.

Trump pardoned them (Manafort and Flynn) because, hey, he’s a treasonous piece of shit too.

Nice straw man, no kindly stop saying Trump had anything to do with Russian collusion.

This argument makes no sense. Trump has been caught on camera begging for help from the Russians.

"Durrr trumps obviously guilty look at all these people and their process crimes "

Man the brainwashing needed to make those leaps would make Stalin proud

Trump’s inner circle is full of criminals because, surprise, he is a criminal himself. It seems like you enjoy the taste of his ballsack, but you’re going to need to disengage and come up for air every once in a while.

 

[Saye_mc]

They lied about their conversations with foreign intelligence agents that are the enemies of the United States.

Trump pardoned them (Manafort and Flynn) because, hey, he’s a treasonous piece of shit too.


This argument makes no sense. Trump has been caught on camera begging for help from the Russians.

Trump’s inner circle is full of criminals because, surprise, he is a criminal himself. It seems like you enjoy the taste of his ballsack, but you’re going to need to disengage and come up for air every once in a while.

Trump hasn't been caught doing anything illegal, with regards to the Russians. There was a multifaceted, multi year investigation into all things Trump by the FBI and a special prosecutor and in the end the Special prosecutor, who was pro Clinton and vehemently Anti Trump was forced to admit there is no avenue for charges


However Clinton has been found Guilty by the FEC, for paying a forigen agent to produce Disinformation about Trump in order to sway the 2016 election...

She was found guilty by the FEC for this, but as of yet there hasn't been a 2 year, multi faceted investigation headed by a special prosecutor to get to the bottom of the forigen interference...


Hmm maga been asking all the clinton folk about the dossier...I wonder if they will form a special council as is their right, maybe they'll appoint the republican version of Schiff to lead this council maybe someone who is extremely Anti Clinton like perhaps MTG


You willing to bet your account that Clinton could survive that level of scrutiny?

They'll be alot more then members of her staff being arrested for process crimes.....


Also what's to stop some conservative District attorney from pressing felony charges on her for misrepresenting in her paperwork what the misused campaign funds were actually for?


You think she'll survive that one?


Nah absolutely not

Maybe it's coming
Maybe there's nothing you can do about it, but just sit there and take it for 6 years as ourside was forced to.

 

[Saye_mc]

I can tell the future

Spin number 1

Spoiler

whataboutism

Spin number 2

Spoiler

its different Hiliary didn't commit a crime......as if paying a forigen agent money to compose a tabloid style hit piece then leak it to the public is suddenly not a crime or election interference

Spin number 3

Spoiler

inevitable rage as you feel the makeup on your mannequin run off its face

 

[Spounman]

Beer colossus Anheuser-Busch saw its value plummet more than $5 billion since the company announced its branding partnership with controversial transgender media influencer Dylan Mulvaney.

 

[HOLA]

It's nor whataboutism its reailty, Hilary did what ever you're claiming Trump did but on a bigger scale.

Hillary did not do what Trump did. She - or her campaign and the DNC - were fined for mislabeling their funding of the dossier. They labeled it as legal services instead of opposition research. That's it. it was how they disclosed it on forms, not that they did it. Hiring Steele in and of itself was not illegal. He ran a private intelligence firm. People use them all the time. In fact, Steele's research began because a conservative outlet hired him first.

Trump was accused of being in cahoots with a hostile foreign government. You see the difference?

I mean your evidence is an email to trump Jr , from a forign actor offering dishonest info on Clinton.

No, i've mentioned far more than that, just on this page. Do you have the memory of a goldfish, or are you lying? Hmm. ¿Por qué no los dos? Some examples I've recently mentioned are:

• Trump soliciting Russian assistance on TV, for which they gave in a few hours.
• Trump working on a business project - Trump Tower Moscow - which required the approval of a hostile foreign power to complete, while running for POTUS, and lying about it.
• The Trump Tower meeting, soliciting dirt from Russian agents in exchange for possibly easing sanctions.
• Firing the head of the FBI for investigating your contacts with Russia, then surreptitiously inviting Russian spies into the oval office immediately after, to celebrate and hand them over classified information.

There are many, many more points of contact that could be elaborated on. But you can't handle what's already been mentioned, so that's a moot point.

Clinton contacted a forigen actor and paid him over 1 million dollars to create disinformation on Trump, and then attempted to interfer with the election and Trumps presidency (which could be considered treason) by handing this document, paid for and then handed over to the fbi.

Who cares if he was foreign? He was a private British citizen. This is not equivalent to working with the agents of a hostile foreign power, obviously, no matter how much you want it to be so. Once again, do you believe Steele should have worked for free? What's wrong with paying him?

The raw intelligence Steele compiled, which by his own admission was probably only 70-90% accurate, was given to intelligence by Steele himself, because he thought it was a matter of national security.

There's no getting out of it. I'm not whataboutism nothing.

I maintain Trump is innocent as was proven by the Mueller Report. You're claiming he is guilty and you offer the emails as proof.

So, you're lying. The Mueller Report stated:

"does not conclude that the President committed a crime"; however, "it also does not exonerate him"

That's not "proven innocent." The report goes on to state Russian interference in the election was "sweeping and systematic," welcomed by Trump, and that there were numerous links between Trump's inner circle and people connected to the Russian government.

Guess what bud, Trumps innocent and if not, based on your own "evidence" Clinton and the DNC interfered with the 2016 election with the aide of a forigen agent.


That's facts bro
Facts

You're a liar, and very ignorant to boot. An unfortunate combo.

 

[Saye_mc]

I can tell the future

Spin number 1

Spoiler

whataboutism

Spin number 2

Spoiler

its different Hiliary didn't commit a crime......as if paying a forigen agent money to compose a tabloid style hit piece then leak it to the public is suddenly not a crime or election interference

Spin number 3

Spoiler

inevitable rage as you feel the makeup on your mannequin run off its face

Hillary did not do what Trump did. She - or her campaign and the DNC - were fined for mislabeling their funding of the dossier. They labeled it as legal services instead of opposition research. That's it. it was how they disclosed it on forms, not that they did it. Hiring Steele in and of itself was not illegal. He ran a private intelligence firm. People use them all the time. In fact, Steele's research began because a conservative outlet hired him first.

Trump was accused of being in cahoots with a hostile foreign government. You see the difference?

No, i've mentioned far more than that, just on this page. Do you have the memory of a goldfish, or are you lying? Hmm. ¿Por qué no los dos? Some examples I've recently mentioned are:

• Trump soliciting Russian assistance on TV, for which they gave in a few hours
• Trump working on a business project - Trump Tower Moscow - which required the approval of a hostile foreign power to complete, while running for POTUS, and lying about it.
• The Trump Tower meeting, soliciting dirt from Russian agents in exchange for possibly easing sanctions.
• Firing the head of the FBI for investigating your contacts with Russia, then surreptitiously inviting Russian spies into the oval office immediately after, to celebrate and hand them over classified information.

There are many, many more points of contact that could be elaborated on. But you can't handle what's already been mentioned, so that's a moot point.

Who cares if he was foreign? He was a private British citizen. This is not equivalent to working with the agents of a hostile foreign power, obviously, no matter how much you want it to be so. Once again, do you believe Steele should have worked for free? What's wrong with paying him?

The raw intelligence Steele compiled, which by his own admission was probably only 70-90% accurate, was given to intelligence by Steele himself, because he thought it was a matter of national security.

So, you're lying. The Mueller Report stated:

"does not conclude that the President committed a crime"; however, "it also does not exonerate him"

That's not "proven innocent." The report goes on to state Russian interference in the election was "sweeping and systematic," welcomed by Trump, and that there were numerous links between Trump's inner circle and people connected to the Russian government.



You're a liar, and very ignorant to boot. An unfortunate combo.

.
It's almost like I know you and your playbook..

What were you doing in 2002? I know what I was doing, marching the streets of Philly protesting the war on terror and also Served as treasurer to the Rhode island Chapter of ANSWER

So in short while you were running outside playing TV tag I was sitting with community organizers penning the playbook that indoctrinated you.

You're running a z pattern on my playbook kid, don't be surprised when I intercept


Also let me shatter your whole rebuttal with one simple statement. Christopher Steele was not a "British civilian " Christopher Steele was a British Spy..

A forigen agent...
To a country who had a very liberal leader and whose political beliefs were tied up with the DNC.


Not a normal person like you and me.


Bye bye narrative

 

[Saye_mc]

Don't make me start putting makeup on my mannequin

Because I will.

 

[James Bomb]

Trump hasn't been caught doing anything illegal, with regards to the Russians. There was a multifaceted, multi year investigation into all things Trump by the FBI and a special prosecutor and in the end the Special prosecutor, who was pro Clinton and vehemently Anti Trump was forced to admit there is no avenue for charges

Trump obstructed the investigation, because he’s obviously guilty. Why else wouldn’t he cooperate with a Republican special prosecutor? Why else would he issue some of the dirtiest pardons in US history to his co-conspirators?

However Clinton has been found Guilty by the FEC, for paying a forigen agent to produce Disinformation about Trump in order to away the 2016 election...

Clinton’s campaign was fined $8k for having the wrong description in election filings. It’s already been pointed out to you in this very thread, but you’re on such a bender that you didn’t even realize.

She was found guilty by the FEC for this, but as of yet there hasn't been a 2 year, multi faceted investigation headed by a special prosecutor to get to the bottom of the forigen interference...

Yeah chief, nobody is going to waste their time on that, other than you maybe.

Hmm maga been asking all the clinton folk about the dossier...I wonder if they will form a special council as is their right, maybe they'll appoint the republican version of Schiff to lead this council maybe someone who is extremely Anti Clinton like perhaps MTG

Yeah, that would surely work out well for Republicans. Taking away rights from women and minorities has been such a successful campaign platform that following it up with another wild goose chase will certainly win over swing state voters!

You willing to bet your account that Clinton could survive that level of scrutiny?

They'll be alot more than members of her staff being arrested for process crimes.....

Yeah sure, that will happen any day now!

Also what's to stop some conservative District attorney from pressing felony charges on her for misrepresenting in her paperwork what the misused campaign funds were actually for?


You think she'll survive that one?


Nah absolutely not

Maybe it's coming
Maybe there's nothing you can do about it, but just sit there and take it for 6 years as ourside was forced to.

We already went through this whole episode, it was the Durham probe and the resulting trials. You know the ones that were going to prove that the nefarious DEEP STATE wronged Trump and all the other fanciful nonsense that you’re rambling on about here.

The net result was two not guilty verdicts and one misdemeanor plea deal that resulted in a year of probation and the FBI lawyer keeping his law license.

Now tell me again about “process crimes” you thumb sucking weirdo.

 

[Saye_mc]

Trump obstructed the investigation, because he’s obviously guilty. Why else wouldn’t he cooperate with a Republican special prosecutor? Why else would he issue some of the dirtiest pardons in US history to his co-conspirators?



Clinton’s campaign was fined $8k for having the wrong description in election filings. It’s already been pointed out to you in this very thread, but you’re on such a bender that you didn’t even realize.


Yeah chief, nobody is going to waste their time on that, other than you maybe.



Yeah, that would surely work out well for Republicans. Taking away rights from women and minorities has been such a successful campaign platform that following it up with another wild goose chase will certainly win over swing state voters!



Yeah sure, that will happen any day now!



We already went through this whole episode, it was the Durham probe and the resulting trials. You know the ones that were going to prove that the nefarious DEEP STATE wronged Trump and all the other fanciful nonsense that you’re rambling on about here.

The net result was two not guilty verdicts and one misdemeanor plea deal that resulted in a year of probation and the FBI lawyer keeping his law license.

Now tell me again about “process crimes” you thumb sucking weirdo.

Are you sure the Durham probe is over?

Hey man why don't you go look at the newest batch of national polls

I don't think trump has to worry about swing states

 

[HOLA]

.
It's almost like I know you and your playbook..

What were you doing in 2002? I know what I was doing, marching the streets of Philly protesting the war on terror and also Served as treasurer to the Rhode island Chapter of ANSWER

.So in short while you were running outside playing TV tag I was sitting with community organizers penning the playbook that indoctrinated you.

mmm...OK?

.Also let me shatter your whole rebuttal with one simple statement.

Yes, just ignore everything I wrote, only to reiterate that Christopher Steele was British. That's the only knockout punch you need lol.

Christopher Steele was not a "British civilian " Christopher Steele was a British Spy..

A forigen agent...
To a country who had a very liberal leader and whose political beliefs were tied up with the DNC.


Not a normal person like you and me.

That's a great point. You'd imagine they'd hire a pizza delivery boy to use his intelligence sources to compile a dossier on Trump's Russian connections. Instead they hired a former intelligence officer from MI6 who was in charge of Russian intel. Wow, why?
<mma2>

When Steele was first working on the Dossier David Cameron was Prime Minister. Is he some bleeding heart liberal? Was he even tangentially involved in the creation of the dossier?

.Bye bye narrative

Look out! Saye MC was a treasurer in Philly in 2002 and Christopher Steele is British! My argument is invalid.

 

[brackis1]

Guys can we STFU about Russia and get back to being wretched bigots who despise people's sexuality deeply?

 

[HOLA]

Are you sure the Durham probe is over?

Hey man why don't you go look at the newest batch of national polls
I don't think trump has to worry about swing states

 

[Saye_mc]

It isn't though, it's still ongoing.

 

[HOLA]

It isn't though, it's still ongoing.

Yeah, he's saving Hillary's arrest for when he releases his final report perhaps.

 

[Saye_mc]

Yeah, he's saving Hillary's arrest for when he releases his final report perhaps.

yup when Trumps back in the white house and the deep state lost all their power

 

[jk7707]

yup when Trumps back in the white house and the deep state lost all their power

We know this is your fantasy. You've stated it many times. Problem is, there's literally no way he sways any moderates to his side the way he's campaigning right now if he wins the Republican nomination. And if he doesn't do that, he's going to lose worse than he did in 2020. This culture war bullshit Republicans are latching on to is a losing strategy.

 

[James Bomb]

Are you sure the Durham probe is over?

Hey man why don't you go look at the newest batch of national polls

I don't think trump has to worry about swing states

Poll: Trump's big post-indictment bounce is fading fast
The former president's lead over Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis in the Republican primary has shrunk 10 points since late March.

View media item 31993

 

[Darkballs]

You guys are wasting your time with a known troll on his third account.

 

[James Bomb]

We know this is your fantasy. You've stated it many times. Problem is, there's literally no way he sways any moderates to his side the way he's campaigning right now if he wins the Republican nomination. And if he doesn't do that, he's going to lose worse than he did in 2020. This culture war bullshit Republicans are latching on to is a losing strategy.

If Trump keeps losing, then that by proxy means that @Saye_mc keeps losing also, and that can’t keep happening again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again

 

[HOLA]

yup when Trumps back in the white house and the deep state lost all their power

But when he was president 2016-2020 all he did was complain about the Deep State sabotaging him, eventually even stealing the election from him.

Trump may be a good demagogue, but he's not very good at being a despot.

You think Putin would lose an election and then dick tuck to his summer home, whining like a bitch on social media about it? You think Winnie the Pooh over there in China would voluntarily leave? Fuck no. You have to take those guys out in a bodybag.

Your dear leader isn't even competent at being a bad guy.