Yeah, but this too...
True.
Plus Reese blew his load in that dirty hobo's pants.![]()
Must have been because of that lighting guy messing with Bale's performance.Additionally, Bale is one of the greatest actors of his generation and I'm a huge fan. That's probably the only performance of his I've seen where I felt he didn't get the chance to do anything of note. Nothing stood out.
T1 > Alien
Aliens > T2
I love both equally though, maybe even prefer Terminator slightly. The soundtrack to T1 was incredible.
Must have been because of that lighting guy messing with Bale's performance.
I voted Alien despite having watched T2 roughly 40,000 times a kid. T3 was worse than Christian Bales acting and it’s getting all kinds of support in the other thread though so I imagine this will be a tight race....
Exactly my reasoning. Even a bad David Fincher movie is interesting. I don't even remember who directed T3 but the crane chase is the only memorable thing about that movie.Alien 3 > Terminator 3.
The others are all close, the third movies are the tiebreaker.
Same with Alien, what's your point?
Alien3 is bad, perhaps very bad.
Eh, I wouldn't go that far
By itself its bad.
When compared to Aliens, killing off Newt and Hicks unceremoniously off-screen, and saying Ripley's chestburster taking DAYS to gestate, and Sigorney Weaver's demand it wouldn't have any guns?
There's an argument it was very bad.
'Alien' showed it taking hours, maybe a day, after the facehugger attaches, an hour or two after the victim regains conciousness.What’s wrong with the alien taking days?
It took at least a day in Alien
That one line was supposed to explain a plot convenience?It was also a queen alien
Not having guns is a plus.
Damn unforgivable.Killing off newt and my boy hicks is dumb tho