Adamek vs Cunningham December 22 NBC

Cazadores said:
Seems to me like Adamek has gotten two gifts against Cunningham and Chambers, and lucky against Arreola who broke his hand.

I can't get my head around how a guy like Adamek robbing Americans in America. What are the judges seeing? All I can think is they are getting paid.

I like Adamek, but he is not a top ten HW.
Click to expand...

the 119-109 score against chambers was ridiculous

but he still won that fight IMO
 
Cazadores said:
I can't get my head around how a guy like Adamek robbing Americans in America. What are the judges seeing? All I can think is they are getting paid.
Click to expand...

He is basically a home town fighter in the north east and sells all the tickets.
 
brocktober714 said:
We can all agree that these two fighters don't belong at hw though
Click to expand...

Depends what they weigh in my opinion. I certainly wouldn't feel comfortable letting adamek fight at welterweight given his size.
 
The President said:
I'm sick to death of judges scoring rounds for fighters based off a 20 second charge at the end of the round. It's ridiculous.
Click to expand...

This and the guy who is walking forward always seems to get the benefit of the doubt.
 
all 3 judges scores round 9-12 the same

round 9 10-9 adamek
round 10 10-9 cunninhgam
round 11 and 12 10-9 each for adamek.
 
round by round scoring is on boxingscene. one judge gave obvious OBVIOUS no question rounds that cunningham won to adamek.

he also gave rounds that seemed obvious to adamek that he won the other way.... didnt even watch the fight?? i have no problem with 115-113 either way.

but when they show the break down.

2 judges were fairly consistent and it didnt seem like a bullshit decesion. then you read the 116-112 and it's just all fucked up...

PS there wasnt ONE round this fight that all THREE judges gave to steve cunningham.
 
Narcis Prince said:
round by round scoring is on boxingscene. one judge gave obvious OBVIOUS no question rounds that cunningham won to adamek.

he also gave rounds that seemed obvious to adamek that he won the other way.... didnt even watch the fight?? i have no problem with 115-113 either way.

but when they show the break down.

2 judges were fairly consistent and it didnt seem like a bullshit decesion. then you read the 116-112 and it's just all fucked up...

PS there wasnt ONE round this fight that all THREE judges gave to steve cunningham.
Click to expand...

I saw 4 rounds that I thought were toss up rounds, I gave two of those to Adamek. HAd I given every close round to Adamek, I would have had it a draw.
 
Seano said:
I saw 4 rounds that I thought were toss up rounds, I gave two of those to Adamek. HAd I given every close round to Adamek, I would have had it a draw.
Click to expand...


2 rounds you scored all 3 judges gave to adamek. was sort of puzzled by your scoring, not that your final score was odd, but the way you got there seemed really off..
 
Narcis Prince said:
2 rounds you scored all 3 judges gave to adamek. was sort of puzzled by your scoring, not that your final score was odd, but the way you got there seemed really off..
Click to expand...

Not really, everyone gave Cunningham the first two rounds, I thought Adamek won them.

A few people gave Adamek the round where he landed two big punches at the last 10 seconds, I gave that to Cunningham.
 
Seano said:
Not really, everyone gave Cunningham the first two rounds, I thought Adamek won them.

A few people gave Adamek the round where he landed two big punches at the last 10 seconds, I gave that to Cunningham.
Click to expand...

there was one round where cunningham threw less than 10 punches and adamek was doing combo after combo and you gave that to cunningham was puzzled. did you give it based on defence? or was it the fact cunningam was 5/10 50% and adamek was 20/45 less than 50%. or maybe you were checking the forum. were you trying to make it more even because you changed your mind about a prior one?
 
It amazes me that Adamek had 23 pounds on Cunningham. Cunningham looked huge in there. I suppose it's all an illusion or something. Maybe he's got JJ chicken legs?
 
Narcis Prince said:
there was one round where cunningham threw less than 10 punches and adamek was doing combo after combo and you gave that to cunningham was puzzled. did you give it based on defence? or was it the fact cunningam was 5/10 50% and adamek was 20/45 less than 50%. or maybe you were checking the forum. were you trying to make it more even because you changed your mind about a prior one?
Click to expand...

I didn't see Adamek landing a lot of clean shots. I saw him throwing a lot of punches.I usually don't score a fight by counting punches because thats the wrong way to do it. Punch stat crews don't usually do a good job distinguishing between clean punches and thrown punches. Thats why most of us don't use punch stats to score fights.

Pretty solid troll attempt though. Not bad.
 
TRYHARD 2001 said:
It amazes me that Adamek had 23 pounds on Cunningham. Cunningham looked huge in there. I suppose it's all an illusion or something. Maybe he's got JJ chicken legs?
Click to expand...

Cunningham is tall but incredibly lean.
 
I had it 116 - 112 USS:

10-9
10-9
10-9
10-9
9-10
10-9
10-9
9-10
9-10
10-9
9-10
10-9
 
can't say I'm too excited to learn the TV ratings for this one, good or bad. One guy quits for no reason the other is a shitty decision.
 
ZroC said:
can't say I'm too excited to learn the TV ratings for this one, good or bad. One guy quits for no reason the other is a shitty decision.
Click to expand...

Boxing is it's worst enemy.
Boxing momentum is over, it's dead :-(
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,281,039
Messages
58,337,041
Members
176,003
Latest member
HeneryH

Share this page

Back
Top