M
monster zero
Guest
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2011/mar/17/us-spy-operation-social-networks
So we know the US are sponsoring social media accounts to push it's agenda. We also know if this does work that there is no reason businesses etc wouldn't do the same to promote policy in their favor. I'm kind of curious though, a lot of times we kind of think of paid schills as being pro one thing or another..
What are the chances that they are also creating posts that garner negative attention towards the side they are against?
Think about it, if you're a globalist and wanted to push multiculturalism/open borders/immigration etc, do you think it would be beneficial to not only simply write pro policy propaganda, but to also paint the opposition of it as ridiculous and exaggerated?
When you read absolute racist drivel and far right non sense, could it also be possible that some of these are going to be paid schills? These identity politics and new forms of propaganda have me spun. I don't know up from down, or the retards from the schills anymore tbh.
Either way, if a popular web forum is generating enough traffic and fits a certain demographic, don't you think it may be targeted? Wonder where sherdog falls on the alexa rankings.
Really something to think about next time you're arguing online til you're read in the face, and your opposition flat out ignores logic. The person on the other side may have nothing more invested in the conversation than an hourly wage and a laugh. They may also just be victims of the US educational system. Stay triggered, my friends.
So we know the US are sponsoring social media accounts to push it's agenda. We also know if this does work that there is no reason businesses etc wouldn't do the same to promote policy in their favor. I'm kind of curious though, a lot of times we kind of think of paid schills as being pro one thing or another..
What are the chances that they are also creating posts that garner negative attention towards the side they are against?
Think about it, if you're a globalist and wanted to push multiculturalism/open borders/immigration etc, do you think it would be beneficial to not only simply write pro policy propaganda, but to also paint the opposition of it as ridiculous and exaggerated?
When you read absolute racist drivel and far right non sense, could it also be possible that some of these are going to be paid schills? These identity politics and new forms of propaganda have me spun. I don't know up from down, or the retards from the schills anymore tbh.
Either way, if a popular web forum is generating enough traffic and fits a certain demographic, don't you think it may be targeted? Wonder where sherdog falls on the alexa rankings.
Really something to think about next time you're arguing online til you're read in the face, and your opposition flat out ignores logic. The person on the other side may have nothing more invested in the conversation than an hourly wage and a laugh. They may also just be victims of the US educational system. Stay triggered, my friends.
