Why cant people seem to understand about the simple concept of "CHAMP HAS TO BE BEATEN DECISIVELY!". Did Condit decisively beat Lawler for the belt? NO Did Hendricks decisively beat GSP for the belt? NO Did Gus decisively beat Jones for the belt? NO If a fight goes the distance and it was razor thin, I don't see why it doesnt go to the champ. They havent been beaten by the challenger. Anyone else agree?