A problem with any military action in Syria.

Quequeg

Banned
Banned
Joined
Feb 8, 2018
Messages
3,366
Reaction score
2
We still have troops on the ground, any action we take the troops become targets. If our troops are attacked we will have respond leading to cycles of escalation.
 
There is military action going on in Syria already. Its been that way for several years.

The problem is not stopping this man.
 
We still have troops on the ground, any action we take the troops become targets. If our troops are attacked we will have respond leading to cycles of escalation.

I think the Russian troops in Syria is the far bigger concern.

I wonder if they are going to dust off the exact same bombing campaign that Obama spiked in 2013 when intelligence officials threatened to resign if their dissent wasn't officially noted in the intelligence report.
 
If Iranian, Russian, and Syrian forces all decide to attack our troops in Syria, what then?
 
Id imagine they will quite quickly understand the gap in military capabilites, tech and training ...the remaining ones that is.
They only just stopped picking up body parts from their last little attempt
 
I could be wrong but... I believe that would be the goal, no?
 
We still have troops on the ground, any action we take the troops become targets. If our troops are attacked we will have respond leading to cycles of escalation.

This is what happens when you have a complete megalomaniac in power, that is obviously getting the signal that the only way he can garner support and watch pundits praise him on the tv is attacking a poor middle eastern country. Just the mere sight of brown people dying will have the US media establishment uncontrollably orgasming.

See this attack will accomplish nothing but prolonging the suffering of Syrians - something Saudis, Israelis and Americans is obviously interested in.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,254,682
Messages
56,664,620
Members
175,337
Latest member
Super Kick Gym
Back
Top