• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Tuesday Aug 19, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST (date has been pushed). This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

A physical altercation between Colby and Werdum in Austrailia

iwhoopedbatman said:
Well, I disagreed that Cryborg was justified hitting that loud mouth woman a few months ago, but Sherdog told me, 'talk shit, get hit.' Werdum shouldn't be doing that, but Colby whining about it as he walks away and checking over his shoulder as he talks shit about Brazil isn't something I'm overly upset seeing. Regardless, cathartic or not, Werdum shouldn't be hitting people outside the cage/gym.
Click to expand...

Maybe Colby should sue him like the little American pussy ass bitch that he is.
 
MikalP said:
This depends entirely where you are. In many, many places it is absolutely illegal to incite hate propaganda. Hate propaganda is not covered under free speech. Even in Brazil, where this all exploded with Colby, hate speech is not covered under freedom of speech. It is the same here in Canada.
Click to expand...
That's irrelevant. If what Colby said is illegal, then that's an issue for the authorities. Whether you consider it 'hate speech' or not, no one has the legal authority to do what Werdum did. Stop excusing uncivilized behavior. It makes you look terrible.
 
ChangeIsComing said:
Yeah Werdum is an arrogant piece of shit and dumb as nails....I cannot say I like Colby much lol but Werdum picking on a 170lber is weak as fuck...prior to this it was Ferguson.
Click to expand...
True...forgot about the Tony thing too. That was even worse because Tony hadn't even done anything lol. These Brazilians are so arrogant and unintelligent, everything is some challenge to their manhood. Crazy.
 
"This guy is really audacious," Werdum told FloCombat. "I went down with my master [Rafael Cordeiro]: 'Master, let's get a hair cut and shave the beard.' We were in the lobby, and I've never seen this guy before. When I walked he looked at me and said: 'Brazilian animals.' And I was like: 'Hey.' I slapped his phone and asked, 'What did you say?' Then, he kicked my leg, but I managed to defend. Then the guys got in the middle and had nothing left. But he kicked me, he is audacious. I could have hurt myself.

"I don't know why he insists on this mistake of speaking of the Brazilians... I didn't understand. [...] He wants media, wants to imitate Conor McGregor. He looks like ridiculous the way he does. I didn't believe when he said it. I didn't believe it. I slapped his phone and he stepped back and kicked me. Then we were arguing, and he kept shouting that Brazilians were animals.

"If I had hit him in the face, he would be in the hospital. Certainly. There was no punch, he's crazy."

Source: https://www.flocombat.com/articles/...n-colby-covington-incident-there-was-no-punch
 
Coolidge said:
That's irrelevant. If what Colby said is illegal, then that's an issue for the authorities. Whether you consider it 'hate speech' or not, no one has the legal authority to do what Werdum did. Stop excusing uncivilized behavior. It makes you look terrible.
Click to expand...

So leave it to Colby Covington to press charges and have his attorney defend him in court. I saw you crying about threats earlier; do you think Colby should be held accountable for the threats he made to Werdum as well?

Regardless, that has absolutely nothing to do with your weird obsession with defending and/or denying the existence of hate speech, which is what the conversation we are in has been about.

I have not denied that punching someone is assault. You have denied that hate speech is at all problem.
 
MikalP said:
Hate speech has laid out definitions under legal terms what the fuck are you talking about lmao there are literal examples of what speech is and is not covered under freedom of speech in almost every country, and hate speech is defined in each of those

you actually don't know what you are talking about
Click to expand...

You're a bit dense.

You just said that different countries have different rules and definitions for 'hate speech'. That's part of being subjective. There is even subjectivity within these individual rules. A lot of it is not cut and cry. A lot of it has to do with a person's interpretation.
 
Now Colby will get flack from the LGBT community too. Lol
 
I kinda doubt Werdum would flat out lie about being called an animal. In which case, why talk that shit if you don't want the drama? Werdum is clearly bout that action boss

MARICÓviNgton

Maricón: confirmed
 
Last edited:
Colby very visibly had a mark on his face, AND HE admit to trying to destroy Colby's very expensive phone. That may not be assault in Brazil, but it is everywhere else! Arrest Fabricio!
 
Coolidge said:
That's irrelevant. If what Colby said is illegal, then that's an issue for the authorities. Whether you consider it 'hate speech' or not, no one has the legal authority to do what Werdum did. Stop excusing uncivilized behavior. It makes you look terrible.
Click to expand...

I think smacking a racist punk in the mouth is quite civilized.
 
Love that he threw a fucking Boomerang at his ass. He had to be watching The Road Warrior down there in Australia. Got Colby Jack Cheese in the head too...
tumblr_m57claccdp1qz7mamo2_500.gif
 
Lol. I repeat, Werdum shouldn't be doing that, but having seen this video and the video of them outside, Colby got punked like a bitch. For someone who says he loves the heel role and pissing people off, he sure doesn't like dealing with the people he's pissing off.

Why are people discussing freedom of speech? Werdum isn't part of any government. Nothing about freedom of speech in this country or Australia says you're free from consequences for saying shit. Werdum is guilty of assault unless Colby attacked him physically or agreed to a fight on the spot, but it's not a freedom of speech issue.

Still lol at pulling out your phone and trying to act tough while you walk away talking shit while looking over your shoulder. Did he call the cops too?
 
MikalP said:
So leave it to Colby Covington to press charges and have his attorney defend him in court. That has absolutely nothing to do with your weird obsession with defending and/or denying the existence of hate speech, which is what the conversation we are in has been about.
Click to expand...

Why 'and/or'? Are you unclear about what I'm actually doing? What's so strange about it, exactly? 'I don't necessarily agree with what you have to say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it' <-- Is that concept foreign to whatever shithole you're from? It's not about Colby's comments specifically. It's about the general principle of the matter.

I have not denied that punching someone is assault. You have denied that hate speech is at all problem.
Click to expand...

Actually, I did no such thing.
 
Coolidge said:
You're a bit dense.

You just said that different countries have different rules and definitions for 'hate speech'. That's part of being subjective. There is even subjectivity within these individual rules. A lot of it is not cut and cry. A lot of it has to do with a person's interpretation.
Click to expand...

He was talking about rights. I am saying that the rights you have in regards to freedom of speech depend on where you are. Rights are not up to a person's interpretation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,271,317
Messages
57,710,087
Members
175,814
Latest member
Geovane santos

Share this page

Back
Top