damn, you’ve devolved into someone pretty obnoxious. I didn’t admit I lied, I said I’d give you the benefit of the doubt and a fresh start, something you don’t seem capable of doing.You have strained and lied consistently and you even earlier in questioning my motives rather than positions... you admitted to it.
Why don't you make your best thorough case for why it's better for trans people to get fund ng set aside for women rather than to study their issues and set aside policies and funding for them?
you consider trans-women to be women? weird how in prisons so many of them have more sexual assault on their records. you would think if they were real women it would be identical to women....
As predicted:
"The real danger is that the public are likely to misinterpret them in a way that will create unwarranted hostility toward the minority under the microscope. The fall-out in terms of violence and abuse will, in some cases, be significant."
Only you are using terms “real woman” or “identical to women”The pie is 100%. If you add “trans women” and “trans men” categories to your pie, you have to take it from somewhere else. It’s a small %.let's hear your argument for that position as its the most indefensible of arguments from the trans community. i don't consider them women so that's obvious why i insist that it is taking positions and funding away from women. because it factually is and will.
why do you continually use this language? Trans women are trans women. Your insistence in just calling them men is again puzzling for someone who claims to be so loving to them. They want to present themselves to society as women (and trans men the opposite). They aren’t forced to self identify as trans. Again, do you think they should be forced?what is your argument for men are actually women. what do you found your position on specifically?
this is the foundational philosophical position on which nearly everything else you say rests. im sure you have way more than "feels" on this. incidentally this is where kathleen stock comes in very handy as she is a philosopher who can assess philosophical claims. she specifically has a degree in "fiction" and so can address whatever argument you are going to come up with for why men are women.
stock isn’t the preeminent expert on the topic you want to present her as. She has her opinion. You want to prop her up because she speaks to you. That doesn’t make her an expert. And again, trans women are not “men” when it comes to opportunity in the workplace. You can’t even acknowledge this because your “they are men” mantra is sacrosanct.
What about trans men? I guess they are women (we’re stuck in binary land) and should be included as women everywhere.
again, trans women aren’t bumping women. They don’t get any societal benefits of being a man. I don’t even think quotas are a good practice. Just end discriminatory practices and ensure qualified candidates aren’t discriminated against. Trans women, identifying as women in their applications, are not “men” in this context. This is obvious.there are quotas being filled by men in the uk that were designed specifically to help women. women have been bumped in place of men taking them. they are set aside for positions in the workplace and in the government. that is taking away from women any way you slice it. look at the gymnastics you have to do to pretend otherwise man....
Again, they don’t have to self identify as trans. Many don’t want to.your position also lacks compassion and concern for the trans-community as they will face different problems and issues that NEED to be identified and addressed compassionately. your position will actually be a sin of omission in that good that would have and could have come to trans people will not.
your position will also make it IMPOSSIBLE for corporations and businesses to provide medical insurance for employees. do you actually suggest that corporations not be privy to male and female designations when putting aside funding to insure men and women and varying ages of those men and women.
what are you talking about? My position is that corporations are mostly handling it fine today. YOU are the one saying it needs to change. Lol at “impossible”. They provide medical insurance just fine……
I have no idea what you’re talking about. I haven’t changed any policies……do you actually suggest riding the world of maternity leave for women in the workplace too? have you even thought about this man? how about days off for menopuse and having a period that most quality employers have put in place. ALL of this will be lost if your policies were to be put into place.
nah. You seem to be confused as well.your positions will all harm women and trans people. your positions are terribly thought out on many levels.
i wont address bathrooms as i have several times and you did NOT read my response. go back and look it up if you want to know.
Then maybe we’re done here if you’re unwilling to discuss critical aspects of how you want things to CHANGE.