News 92-year-old man arrested and found guilty of murdering woman born 133 years ago due to new DNA evidence - the longest cold case in British history

TCE

"That's fucking illegal"
Pink Belt
Joined
Sep 17, 2005
Messages
22,453
Reaction score
25,918
A 92-year-old British man convicted of the 1967 rape and murder of a woman in her home has been sentenced to life in prison.

Ryland Headley was found guilty by Bristol Crown Court in southern England of the rape and murder of Louisa Dunne, who was 75 years old when Headley killed her nearly six decades ago.

Headley was convicted on Monday and the verdict brought an end to a cold case that remained unsolved for 58 years. He was sentenced on Tuesday.

He was told during sentencing that he had committed a “pitiless and cruel act,” according to PA Media news agency.

The judge, Derek Sweeting, sentenced Headley to life in prison, setting a minimum term of 20 years.

“You broke into her home, you sexually assaulted her and in doing so, you caused her death,” Sweeting said, per PA Media.

“You may not have intended to kill, but you planned to rape her, and you brutally attacked her. When you did so, you met her screams and struggles in a force sufficient to kill. The nature of these offenses demonstrates a complete disregard for human life and dignity,” the judge added.

“Mrs Dunne was vulnerable. She was a small, elderly woman living alone. You exploited that vulnerability. You treated her as a means to an end. The violation of her home, her body, and ultimately, her life, was a pitiless and cruel act by a depraved man.”

The judge added that, given Headley’s age, he will “never be released” and will “die in prison.”

DNA profile​

Dunne was found dead in her home in Easton, in the suburbs of Bristol, in June 1967. The police determined at the time that she had been raped and died of strangulation and asphyxiation.

The local constabulary launched a major investigation: they took palmprints from 19,000 men, collected 1,300 statements and made more than 8,000 house-to-house calls, the Avon and Somerset Police said in a statement on Monday.

Yet none of it led anywhere, and the case went cold.

It wasn’t until the police began reviewing the case in 2023 that investigators were able to get a full DNA profile of Dunne’s killer from the skirt she was wearing when she died – using technology that was not available at the time of the crime.

That DNA profile was then matched with samples taken from Headley following his arrest for two rapes in 1977, leading to his arrest in November 2024.

“For 58 years, this appalling crime went unsolved and Ryland Headley, the man we now know is responsible, avoided justice,” crown prosecuting solicitor Charlotte Ream said in a statement by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS).

Headley denied committing the offences, according to the CPS.

20 boxes of evidence reviewed​

A partial handprint found at the scene was also re-examined as part of the case review, the CPS said. The print of a part of a palm, between the wrist and the base of the little finger, was discovered on a window at the back of Dunne’s house and was matched to Headley’s hand by four experts.

“Headley never featured in (the) original investigation as he lived outside the area where the house-to-house enquiries were carried out,” senior investigating officer with the Avon and Somerset police, Detective Inspector Dave Marchant, said in a statement.

Marchant said the “extensive and meticulous work” that was done by the officers in the initial investigation paved the way for the police to solve the crime. He said that as part of the re-investigation, 20 boxes of original material were reviewed by the police.

The CPS said that all but one witness in the case have died over the nearly six decades since the crime was committed, but that old statements were read in court as part of the trial.

The CPS said that Headley’s other offenses were also considered during the trial. While earlier convictions are not automatically admissible in courts in England, the CPS said that the similarities between the Dunne murder and rape and Headley’s two previous convictions for rape were “too great to ignore.”

The CPS said Headley was convicted after pleading guilty of breaking into the homes of two elderly women in Ipswich and raping them. One of the women was in her seventies and the other in her eighties. Their accounts of the attacks to the police at the time were read out to the court.

He was initially sentenced to life imprisonment, but this was reduced following an appeal to a seven-year jail term.

Ream said the verdict on Monday was a “demonstration of the commitment of the CPS, and our partners in the police, to relentlessly pursue justice for the victims of crime, no matter how many years – or decades – have passed.”

But advocacy groups say rape convictions remain low in the UK and the justice process is incredibly slow.

The Office for National Statistics says 71,227 rapes were recorded by police in 2024. According to Rape Crisis, a UK charity, just 2.7% of these cases resulted in charges being brought by the end of 2024.


01jz0jw036az18nfqkpz6wn8pq.jpg


 
If you don't take into account that he raped women in 1977, I would think this would be hard to prove even with the DNA. How do they know it wasn't consensual and then someone else came back in later and killed her? I am glad they did take the other cases into account, because this sick fuck definitely did it.
 
If you don't take into account that he raped women in 1977, I would think this would be hard to prove even with the DNA. How do they know it wasn't consensual and then someone else came back in later and killed her? I am glad they did take the other cases into account, because this sick fuck definitely did it.

I mean the victim was in her mid 70s......

I'm no Sherlock but the chances of her having random consensual sex with a 30 year old stranger then getting murdered afterwards seems improbable. Pretty sure basic forensics can tell when it's rape, too, though I could be mistaken.
 
If he would’ve converted to Islam they would have just swept this under the rug..
 
Justice in 2025 for a victim born in the 19th century.
giphy.gif

Yeah.

“Justice”.

Guy basically got away with it.

Relatively liberal in corporal punishment and the like, but only way true justice could be served would be boiling this cunt alive.

Yet, what would be the point, at this stage.
 
Yeah.

“Justice”.

Guy basically got away with it.

Relatively liberal in corporal punishment and the like, but only way true justice could be served would be boiling this cunt alive.

Yet, what would be the point, at this stage.
There is a difference between justice and justice. In a civilized world justice is what the courts decide and the law prescribes. Justice is also vengeance and can be harsh and easily wrongfully meted out. You hope for the first if wrongfully accused you hope for the second if you are a victim, direct or otherwise. I'm glad he is having some punishment for his disgusting crime
 
There is a difference between justice and justice. In a civilized world justice is what the courts decide and the law prescribes. Justice is also vengeance and can be harsh and easily wrongfully meted out. You hope for the first if wrongfully accused you hope for the second if you are a victim, direct or otherwise. I'm glad he is having some punishment for his disgusting crime

That’s not justice anyway you look at it.

As I say, I’m normally against violence to counter violence, and of course I don’t truly believe this guy should be tortured, but putting a 93 year old in jail for the last months of his life is akin to him getting away with it.
 
If you don't take into account that he raped women in 1977, I would think this would be hard to prove even with the DNA. How do they know it wasn't consensual and then someone else came back in later and killed her? I am glad they did take the other cases into account, because this sick fuck definitely did it.
That's actually one of my favorite excuses when someone denies ever meeting a murder victim until police tell them their finger prints and jizz are all over the murder victim and crime scene. There was one in Texas where a 35 year old semi-homeless guy said he was having a consensual anal affair with the 19 year old girl he murdered, and her boyfriend must have found out, murdered her in their apartment, then loaded the body into her car right outside her mother's window and drove the body 30 minutes away and happened to dump it right near Rodney Reed's house, then I guess walked back 30 miles?

The other good one was the garbage man in Cape Cod who didn't know anything about the fashion writer who was murdered, but then when they found his jizz and fingerprints all over the place, he suddenly remembered that she asked him to come inside to haul away her Christmas tree, and was instantly so turned on by the garbage man covered in trash on his route that they had a quickie in the middle of the living room in front of her infant daughter, and someone else must have come by and murdered her shortly after.
 
If you don't take into account that he raped women in 1977, I would think this would be hard to prove even with the DNA. How do they know it wasn't consensual and then someone else came back in later and killed her? I am glad they did take the other cases into account, because this sick fuck definitely did it.

Pretty sure they have forensic means to determine if a person was raped (ripped panties or stockings, vaginal trauma etc).

Besides, they said the rapes in 1977 were merely how they had the DNA sample in the first place. The fact of his past rape convictions wouldn’t have been able to used against him in the prosecution of this crime. That’s not allowed.
 
That's actually one of my favorite excuses when someone denies ever meeting a murder victim until police tell them their finger prints and jizz are all over the murder victim and crime scene. There was one in Texas where a 35 year old semi-homeless guy said he was having a consensual anal affair with the 19 year old girl he murdered, and her boyfriend must have found out, murdered her in their apartment, then loaded the body into her car right outside her mother's window and drove the body 30 minutes away and happened to dump it right near Rodney Reed's house, then I guess walked back 30 miles?

The other good one was the garbage man in Cape Cod who didn't know anything about the fashion writer who was murdered, but then when they found his jizz and fingerprints all over the place, he suddenly remembered that she asked him to come inside to haul away her Christmas tree, and was instantly so turned on by the garbage man covered in trash on his route that they had a quickie in the middle of the living room in front of her infant daughter, and someone else must have come by and murdered her shortly after.
Would you plead guilty facing LWOP, or 22 years on death row then execution?
 
Back
Top