Not to mention that the unified rules favor wrestlers. Top control without damage dealt = win, and no downward elbows to the back or back of head to stop someone grinding for a takedown.Well, it's a sport based in the US and wrestling is huge here.
that thinking is outdated imo we're 30 yrs+ into this sport. MMA is the best base for MMA
I still think that a great striker from other sports will always have an advantage over guys who come from grappling backgrounds or even pure MMA though.that thinking is outdated imo we're 30 yrs+ into this sport. MMA is the best base for MMA
Not to mention that the unified rules favor wrestlers. Top control without damage dealt = win, and no downward elbows to the back or back of head to stop someone grinding for a takedown.
For a martial art in the US, yes, it's not a huge sport overall here, it's actually way bigger in Russia and Iran.
Where are all the guys with "MMA" as a base? Rory? Who else?
I mean...we are literally in a thread about 6 of the 10 current champs being from a wrestling background...
the guys who have grown up doing mma most of their lives are still young guys like Max Holloway, Michael Mcdonald, Louis Smolka.
We were just talking about this on the standup forum today and was trying to figure out who. Someone said Max but he's evidently had some kickboxing fights before his MMA career. I thought of McDonald but haven't really looked into his background.
Even Sage has a Karate background...
125 MM
135 Cruz
155 Alvarez
170 Woodley
205 DC
265 Miocic
Goes to show, it's not so much the wrestling, but the grinding mentality of wrestlers. Wrestlers might not be the best strikers, but they sure are the toughest in MMA.
Mcdonald is a for sure he's been pro since he was like 16 years old iirc
Maybe he was boxing at 8 or something lol.