Conor McGregor took harder challenges by moving up to 170 and 155 than defending belt

Did McGregor take on tougher challenges by moving up in weight?


  • Total voters
    356

JJCc

Banned
Banned
Joined
Mar 17, 2020
Messages
715
Reaction score
880
Since I've been seeing so many various scattered posts of people giving crap to Conor for not defending the 145 belt, I'm gonna lay out why I don't think that matters, and McGregor actually chose a harder path for himself.

McGregor beat a lot of really good people on his way to the belt:
Aldo, Mendes, Poirier, and Holloway.

If Conor stuck around at 145, he'd probably rematch Aldo, he'd face Frankie Edgar, Max Holloway again, and assuming he's gonna stick long-term he'd face some of the new generation like Ortega, and volkanovski.

I think Conor easily beats Aldo in a rematch (he's longer, bigger, and Aldo's chin was pretty bad after he lost to Mcgregor that first time). I think he beats Max at 145 but it might be interesting, probably beats Frankie the same way he beats Mendez.

Maybe he'd get a challenge out of volkanovski but that wouldn't be until much later and after many title defenses.

I think Conor took a much harder path than sticking around at 145 by moving up to 170 and fighting Diaz twice, and then 155 to fight Alvarez (people say Alvarez's style was made for him, but no one at 145 was going to pose a bigger challenge). Followed by Khabib and Poirier twice, his move to 170 and 155 presented him with much harder fights (excluding Cerrone but that was basically a tune-up fight).

The easier and safer road for Conor would have been to stick around at 145 and defend his belt.
 
Conor only fought at 170 because RDA pulled out, and then Diaz came in short notice.

Who the fuck knows why he fought Cerrone at 170.

And he moved up in weight most likely because he could not make 145 easily anymore.
 
Conor only fought at 170 because RDA pulled out, and then Diaz came in short notice.

Who the fuck knows why he fought Cerrone at 170.

And he moved up in weight most likely because he could not make 145 easily anymore.

Doubt he ever made 145 easily, but he never missed weight either.
 
McRunner being praised for "moving up" to 170 is hilarious.

I'm just saying him fighting Diaz at 170 was harder than any fight that would have been available to him at 145. Do you think Aldo at 145 would be a tougher challenge than fighting Diaz at 170?
 
In what universe is fighters Nate Diaz more of a challenge than Jose Aldo?

Yeah 13 seconds blah blah. You seen Rockhold vs Bisping? Alvarez vs Chandler? Le vs Smith? McGregor vs Diaz!?!?!?

While I do believe McGregor would most likely beat Aldo that didn't mean a rematch wasn't warranted.
 
In what universe is fighters Nate Diaz more of a challenge than Jose Aldo?

Yeah 13 seconds blah blah. You seen Rockhold vs Bisping? Alvarez vs Chandler? Le vs Smith? McGregor vs Diaz!?!?!?

While I do believe McGregor would most likely beat Aldo that didn't mean a rematch wasn't warranted.

Nate Diaz at 170 would be more of a challenge than Aldo at 145.

Diaz isn't a better fighter than Aldo, but size and chin matters a lot. A rematch is probably warranted, but the question isn't should McGregor have given Aldo a rematch, it's whether or not he took a harder fight. The Diaz fight was certainly harder, and evidenced by the fact he lost.
 
Nate Diaz at 170 would be more of a challenge than Aldo at 145.

Diaz isn't a better fighter than Aldo, but size and chin matters a lot. A rematch is probably warranted, but the question isn't should McGregor have given Aldo a rematch, it's whether or not he took a harder fight. The Diaz fight was certainly harder, and evidenced by the fact he lost.
I don't think so.

McGregor got a good decision in the rematch in my opinion. (He took rounds 1, 2 and 4)

I don't think anyone believes McGregor would ever win a five round fight with Aldo at that time. If McGregor doesn't put him away early he's fucked.
 
Since I've been seeing so many various scattered posts of people giving crap to Conor for not defending the 145 belt, I'm gonna lay out why I don't think that matters, and McGregor actually chose a harder path for himself.

McGregor beat a lot of really good people on his way to the belt:
Aldo, Mendes, Poirier, and Holloway.

If Conor stuck around at 145, he'd probably rematch Aldo, he'd face Frankie Edgar, Max Holloway again, and assuming he's gonna stick long-term he'd face some of the new generation like Ortega, and volkanovski.

I think Conor easily beats Aldo in a rematch (he's longer, bigger, and Aldo's chin was pretty bad after he lost to Mcgregor that first time). I think he beats Max at 145 but it might be interesting, probably beats Frankie the same way he beats Mendez.

Maybe he'd get a challenge out of volkanovski but that wouldn't be until much later and after many title defenses.

I think Conor took a much harder path than sticking around at 145 by moving up to 170 and fighting Diaz twice, and then 155 to fight Alvarez (people say Alvarez's style was made for him, but no one at 145 was going to pose a bigger challenge). Followed by Khabib and Poirier twice, his move to 170 and 155 presented him with much harder fights (excluding Cerrone but that was basically a tune-up fight).

The easier and safer road for Conor would have been to stick around at 145 and defend his belt.
Of course he did! These noobie Shertards do not want to hear the truth tho. No fighter in our lifetimes will ever reach the heights of Conor, nor take his low reward high risk challenges at such a peak. This fact makes petty losers mad, tho they will try to dress up their jealousies in sophistry and excuses. When Conor KO’d Aldo in a punch, after such a build up, that was the highest heights MMA will ever reach, and there will always be mad butt hurt over that.

Haters will always hate, it is simply that simple.
 
Back
Top