my head hurt reading this
in a very boring fight but yesSmith got dominated in every aspect of MMA.
Eh, il give him the benefit of the doubt for his next fight since I doubt Santos will try to grapple, if he lays on him the whole fight again im gonna be pissed though lol.in a very boring fight but yes
manuwa was beyond over the hill and volkan won dat figthManuwa and got robbed against Volkan.
http://mmadecisions.com/decision/10794/Volkan-Oezdemir-vs-Aleksandar-Rakicmanuwa was beyond over the hill and volkan won dat figth
some desagree not allVolkan getting a win people disagree with doesn't mean we're not allowed to be impressed by that fight.
http://mmadecisions.com/decision/10794/Volkan-Oezdemir-vs-Aleksandar-Rakic
And call Manuwa over the hill but dont act like that wasnt an impressive 42 second KO. Set up that headkick beautifully.
You cant look at total strikes and judge a fight off that.. Why dont we look at the 8 takedowns defended? My post was a far better indicator over who won the fight. Multiple media scores even had the fight 30-27 for Rakic but none had it 30-27 for Volkan.[
Volkan outstroke rakic impregnated his leg put the pressure and defended takedowns so the nod was correct regardless of what the bias media saysView attachment 818148
some desagree not all
Fair. But especially in a 3 rounder these sort of 2-1 ambigious decisions are a wash where losing doesn't really do anything bad to your reputation. Same with Volkan and Reyes(that one I agreed with). Volkan was best fighter Rakic had fought and doing so well against him made it clear he's the real deal.
i agreed dat rakic had grate performance that night but volkan wonFair. But especially in a 3 rounder these sort of 2-1 ambigious decisions are a wash where losing doesn't really do anything bad to your reputation. Same with Volkan and Reyes(that one I agreed with). Volkan was best fighter Rakic had fought and doing so well against him made it clear he's the real deal.
Volkan is top tier one of the best 205 nowVolkan is mediocre at best, so getting past him says very little.