• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

4 days upper body —- too much?

If you're on gear you may burn out your CNS and develop nagging injuries like tendinitis.
My left knee hurt. Monday did kickboxing with it. Hurt. Not iniured just overused or sore. Tuesday just did a short pull workout only weights. Really short. Wensday complete rest. Today I feel fresh and good. Can do a full mixed workout again, cardio strength ect.
 
You use a lot of upper back for bench and OHP. I try to keep them separate.

Nothing will fuck up your push days more then a heavy pull day the night before and bad sleep

At least do push exercises first. Otherwise your upper back will bottleneck your chest and shoulder development
I said I take a day off after every lifting day
 
I hit upper body 3x per week: Monday, Wednesday and Saturday. Legs + delts isolation + abs on Friday and Sunday.
Each upper body is full upper body by the way: Chest, back, front delts, biceps, triceps and neck.
On Monday traps instead of front delts.
 
I did a bench workout on Saturday and I'd be lucky if I can do another by Thursday(my end of work week). It's Monday and I am sore and stiff as shit. I am 43 and it's crazy that people are talking about working out their upper body several days per week. I tried to do a bit of push ups on my elevated paralletes yesterday for about 8 reps and holy hell was that painful.

Keep in mind I only did 1 rep near my max(with maybe a rep left) and 3 sets of 11,9,8 so while they were to failure it wasn't super heavy. My CNS is fried too and has been fried since the evening of that day.

Like I said those that can lift this way would need to lift very submaximally leaving a lot of reps and weight in the tank/reserve.

I don't even know if I could do this while running a bunch of gear but maybe.
 
I did a bench workout on Saturday and I'd be lucky if I can do another by Thursday(my end of work week). It's Monday and I am sore and stiff as shit. I am 43 and it's crazy that people are talking about working out their upper body several days per week. I tried to do a bit of push ups on my elevated paralletes yesterday for about 8 reps and holy hell was that painful.

Keep in mind I only did 1 rep near my max(with maybe a rep left) and 3 sets of 11,9,8 so while they were to failure it wasn't super heavy. My CNS is fried too and has been fried since the evening of that day.

Like I said those that can lift this way would need to lift very submaximally leaving a lot of reps and weight in the tank/reserve.

I don't even know if I could do this while running a bunch of gear but maybe.
I still lift like I’m in my 20s

Gear doesn’t necessarily help. As I explained earlier.. you end up going lifting heavy weight even on accessory lifts.. you’re always putting real work in.

I think it’s no coincidence I saw the most growth from last spring when I was always sick lol. Cause that shit forced me to workout less frequently
 
I still lift like I’m in my 20s

Gear doesn’t necessarily help. As I explained earlier.. you end up going lifting heavy weight even on accessory lifts.. you’re always putting real work in.

I think it’s no coincidence I saw the most growth from last spring when I was always sick lol. Cause that shit forced me to workout less frequently

I think you're partly misunderstanding what I am saying and also significantly under-representing the benefits.

There's a common talking point in the gear community that gear in of itself doesn't produce the results. That's not only wrong in part but it's also wrong in totality.

Gear in of itself will get you results without even training. It is obviously far better to take advantage and train while running that gear. The flu like symptoms you're describing are somewhat common for certain steroids and prohormones. That's one huge downside. You feel like shit the whole day, your blood work is shit, but when you get in the gym you're beasting out. It's a trade off but generally those substances are not the preferred route for those that run gear from what I gathered.

Gear allows fast recuperation and supraphysiological muscle growth. There are people who are more atuned to gear which allows them to tolerate higher levels without the nasty side effects as well as potentially receive benefits far greater than the average person. This is why you see certain people like Joseph Tumbarello benching 725 at 250-260lb. No other person (of his size) on or off gear can do what he does. But it would be equally silly to pretend that he could even touch what he does off gear and especially life time natural (because even a single cycle changes your physiology).

"
“In one study 2, 35 young men were randomised to one of five groups to receive weekly injections of testosterone enanthate—a commonly used steroid—in amounts that varied from 25 to 600 mg/week. After 20 weeks, the men who received 600 mg/week had gained, on average, 8 kg of muscle, and lost, on average, 1 kg of body fat. These figures are impressive enough, but the real eye-opener is that the men were instructed not to participate in strength-training or endurance exercise during the course of the study. Essentially, these results could have been achieved while sitting on the couch.


In another study 5, Bhasin randomised men to one of four conditions: 600 mg/week of testosterone enanthate and no exercise, 600 mg/week of testosterone enanthate and standardised exercise, placebo and no exercise and placebo and standardised exercise. At 10 weeks, the men given 600 mg/week of testosterone enanthate who did not exercise had put on more muscle mass than the men who were not on testosterone and who did exercise. The implications of this research are hard to ignore: other things being equal, a person cannot out-train, out-diet or outperform steroids.”

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dar.12433
2 Bhasin S. Testosterone dose–response relationships in healthy young men. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2001; 281: 1172–81.


5 Bhasin S, Storer TW, Berman N, et al. The effects of supraphysiologic doses of testosterone on muscle size and strength in normal men. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 1–7"

I ripped this off from a Quora post but essentially even a person sitting on a couch while running gear outperforms natural lifters. This in part explains why male silverback gorillas are so much stronger than even equivalent sized male humans. I doubt Brian Shaw or Thor at their heaviest will do much against a silverback gorilla.
 
I think you're partly misunderstanding what I am saying and also significantly under-representing the benefits.

There's a common talking point in the gear community that gear in of itself doesn't produce the results. That's not only wrong in part but it's also wrong in totality.

Gear in of itself will get you results without even training. It is obviously far better to take advantage and train while running that gear. The flu like symptoms you're describing are somewhat common for certain steroids and prohormones. That's one huge downside. You feel like shit the whole day, your blood work is shit, but when you get in the gym you're beasting out. It's a trade off but generally those substances are not the preferred route for those that run gear from what I gathered.

Gear allows fast recuperation and supraphysiological muscle growth. There are people who are more atuned to gear which allows them to tolerate higher levels without the nasty side effects as well as potentially receive benefits far greater than the average person. This is why you see certain people like Joseph Tumbarello benching 725 at 250-260lb. No other person (of his size) on or off gear can do what he does. But it would be equally silly to pretend that he could even touch what he does off gear and especially life time natural (because even a single cycle changes your physiology).

"
“In one study 2, 35 young men were randomised to one of five groups to receive weekly injections of testosterone enanthate—a commonly used steroid—in amounts that varied from 25 to 600 mg/week. After 20 weeks, the men who received 600 mg/week had gained, on average, 8 kg of muscle, and lost, on average, 1 kg of body fat. These figures are impressive enough, but the real eye-opener is that the men were instructed not to participate in strength-training or endurance exercise during the course of the study. Essentially, these results could have been achieved while sitting on the couch.


In another study 5, Bhasin randomised men to one of four conditions: 600 mg/week of testosterone enanthate and no exercise, 600 mg/week of testosterone enanthate and standardised exercise, placebo and no exercise and placebo and standardised exercise. At 10 weeks, the men given 600 mg/week of testosterone enanthate who did not exercise had put on more muscle mass than the men who were not on testosterone and who did exercise. The implications of this research are hard to ignore: other things being equal, a person cannot out-train, out-diet or outperform steroids.”

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dar.12433
2 Bhasin S. Testosterone dose–response relationships in healthy young men. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2001; 281: 1172–81.


5 Bhasin S, Storer TW, Berman N, et al. The effects of supraphysiologic doses of testosterone on muscle size and strength in normal men. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 1–7"

I ripped this off from a Quora post but essentially even a person sitting on a couch while running gear outperforms natural lifters. This in part explains why male silverback gorillas are so much stronger than even equivalent sized male humans. I doubt Brian Shaw or Thor at their heaviest will do much against a silverback gorilla.
God damn post got deleted

Anyways.. all I said is that steroids won’t allow you to workout more frequently if you have an injury

They don’t help tendons.. the muscles will outperform the tendons and joints to an even greater extent

And you end up getting backed into doing repetitive exercises. You can only lift as much as the weakest part of your body involved in that motion

I might be way, way stronger then I was natty.. but I still couldn’t hit my natty bench of 305 l. Because my shoulder gives out and it’s not like the tris or even delts can just replace the role of that specific tendon

Anyways…

Obviously gear helps a lot. But I made most of my natty gains when I was an uber driver. Perfect sleep for like 2 years

Then I got a real job.. that shoulder injury started.. got hooked on vivance and slept like 4 hours a night. Lost muscle.. spent a whole year getting it back. Then I got on gear and made probably 2 years of progress in a year

I genuinely believe if I had stayed an uber driver.. stayed natty.. slept 10 hours a night that I would be Close to my current physique. Probably better PRs and slightly less muscle (especially delts)

But I make good money now and uber drivers make shit. So it’s all good I guess.. z
 
God damn post got deleted

Anyways.. all I said is that steroids won’t allow you to workout more frequently if you have an injury

They don’t help tendons.. the muscles will outperform the tendons and joints to an even greater extent

And you end up getting backed into doing repetitive exercises. You can only lift as much as the weakest part of your body involved in that motion

I might be way, way stronger then I was natty.. but I still couldn’t hit my natty bench of 305 l. Because my shoulder gives out and it’s not like the tris or even delts can just replace the role of that specific tendon

Anyways…

Obviously gear helps a lot. But I made most of my natty gains when I was an uber driver. Perfect sleep for like 2 years

Then I got a real job.. that shoulder injury started.. got hooked on vivance and slept like 4 hours a night. Lost muscle.. spent a whole year getting it back. Then I got on gear and made probably 2 years of progress in a year

I genuinely believe if I had stayed an uber driver.. stayed natty.. slept 10 hours a night that I would be Close to my current physique. Probably better PRs and slightly less muscle (especially delts)

But I make good money now and uber drivers make shit. So it’s all good I guess.. z

I hate when I type out long posts and browser crashes. Although recently the browser also randomly saves or even repopulates everything I typed after I already submitted. Although it forces me to get to my point faster or be more succinct.

I am sorry about your injuries and I don't mean to be flippant but you're creating the impression that steroids don't make a HUGE difference. You're essentially saying that because you're unable to replicate or exceed your natural accomplishments in a certain lift while using gear with a serious chronic injury, AAS are over hyped. You also imply that other factors like sleep are more important. That is all nonsense. You're essentially arguing strawmans or provably erroneous assertions. We're not debating whether it's better to take roids and then stay up for a week or be natural and sleep 8-10 hours a night.

Is sleep vital? Of course. Is solid nutrition important? Yes of course.

Are steroids overhyped because you had your legs blown off in 'Nam and you can't exceed your 300lb squat? No...you can't exceed your lift because of an injury/trauma. If you addressed your injury(assuming it's not permanent) then you'll probably exceed your prior PRs. Obviously if you get too old or have some other life altering event then you may still not get there but remember when we discuss how effective something is it's typically "all else equal". Could your younger healthy self get much better gains and PRs on gear? I would bet my last dollar that the answer is yes.
 
Last edited:
I think you're partly misunderstanding what I am saying and also significantly under-representing the benefits.

There's a common talking point in the gear community that gear in of itself doesn't produce the results. That's not only wrong in part but it's also wrong in totality.

Gear in of itself will get you results without even training. It is obviously far better to take advantage and train while running that gear. The flu like symptoms you're describing are somewhat common for certain steroids and prohormones. That's one huge downside. You feel like shit the whole day, your blood work is shit, but when you get in the gym you're beasting out. It's a trade off but generally those substances are not the preferred route for those that run gear from what I gathered.

Gear allows fast recuperation and supraphysiological muscle growth. There are people who are more atuned to gear which allows them to tolerate higher levels without the nasty side effects as well as potentially receive benefits far greater than the average person. This is why you see certain people like Joseph Tumbarello benching 725 at 250-260lb. No other person (of his size) on or off gear can do what he does. But it would be equally silly to pretend that he could even touch what he does off gear and especially life time natural (because even a single cycle changes your physiology).

"
“In one study 2, 35 young men were randomised to one of five groups to receive weekly injections of testosterone enanthate—a commonly used steroid—in amounts that varied from 25 to 600 mg/week. After 20 weeks, the men who received 600 mg/week had gained, on average, 8 kg of muscle, and lost, on average, 1 kg of body fat. These figures are impressive enough, but the real eye-opener is that the men were instructed not to participate in strength-training or endurance exercise during the course of the study. Essentially, these results could have been achieved while sitting on the couch.


In another study 5, Bhasin randomised men to one of four conditions: 600 mg/week of testosterone enanthate and no exercise, 600 mg/week of testosterone enanthate and standardised exercise, placebo and no exercise and placebo and standardised exercise. At 10 weeks, the men given 600 mg/week of testosterone enanthate who did not exercise had put on more muscle mass than the men who were not on testosterone and who did exercise. The implications of this research are hard to ignore: other things being equal, a person cannot out-train, out-diet or outperform steroids.”

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dar.12433
2 Bhasin S. Testosterone dose–response relationships in healthy young men. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2001; 281: 1172–81.


5 Bhasin S, Storer TW, Berman N, et al. The effects of supraphysiologic doses of testosterone on muscle size and strength in normal men. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 1–7"

I ripped this off from a Quora post but essentially even a person sitting on a couch while running gear outperforms natural lifters. This in part explains why male silverback gorillas are so much stronger than even equivalent sized male humans. I doubt Brian Shaw or Thor at their heaviest will do much against a silverback gorilla.

I hate when I type out long posts and browser crashes. Although recently the browser also randomly saves or even repopulates everything I typed after I already submitted. Although it forces me to get to my point faster or be more succinct.

I am sorry about your injuries and I don't mean to be flippant but you're creating the impression that steroids don't make a HUGE difference. You're essentially saying that because you're unable to replicate or exceed your natural accomplishments in a certain lift while using gear with a serious chronic injury, AAS are over hyped. You also imply that other factors like sleep are more important. That is all nonsense. You're essentially arguing strawmans or provably erroneous assertions. We're not debating whether it's better to take roids and then stay up for a week or be natural and sleep 8-10 hours a night.

Is sleep vital? Of course. Is solid nutrition important? Yes of course.

Are steroids overhyped because you had your legs blown off in 'Nam and you can't exceed your 300lb squat? No...you can't exceed your lift because of an injury/trauma. If you addressed your injury(assuming it's not permanent) then you'll probably exceed your prior PRs. Obviously if you get too old or have some other life altering event then you may still not get there but remember when we discuss how effective something is it's typically "all else equal". Could your younger healthy self get much better gains and PRs on gear? I would bet my last dollar that the answer is yes.


Interesting study and I think it's beyond doubt that being on gear increases hypertrophy and strength gains relative to natty.


But as most do, your cited study concludes that increased gear use increased BOTH muscle size AND strength (measured by leg press in this study). All else equal, a bigger muscle is a stronger muscle so this finding is intuitive.

What I haven't seen many studies on and IMO more interesting, is how does a juiced athlete compare to a natty athlete at the newly enhanced size all else being equal? i.e. if a 170 pound powerlifter gets on test, anavar, deca and gets up to 200 lbs, how would his lifts compare to a natty 200 lbs powerlifter at the same bf %? My sense is the juiced lifter would outperform the natty one i.e. juiced muscle is stronger than same size natty muscle, but there are a lot of variables that would be difficult to equalize.

And in skill sports with weight classes like combat sports, PEDs will increase muscle size, strength, durability, aggression even cardio, but won't directly enhance skill, reaction time, coordination, discipline, etc. Shouldn't be controversial that PEDs provide an advantage but I don't think any amount of gear can turn a mediocre skill sport athlete into a champion unless he already has the necessary attributes for success at that level.
 
Last edited:
Interesting study and I think it's beyond doubt that being on gear increases hypertrophy and strength gains relative to natty.


But as most do, your cited study concludes that increased gear use increased BOTH muscle size AND strength (measured by leg press in this study). All else equal, a bigger muscle is a stronger muscle so this finding is intuitive.

What I haven't seen many studies on and IMO more interesting, is how does a juiced athlete compare to a natty athlete at the newly enhanced size all else being equal? i.e. if a 170 pound powerlifter gets on test, anavar, deca and gets up to 200 lbs, how would his lifts compare to a natty 200 lbs powerlifter at the same bf %? My sense is the juiced lifter would outperform the natty one i.e. juiced muscle is stronger than same size natty muscle, but there are a lot of variables that would be difficult to equalize.

With perhaps insanely rare exceptions, a person on gear will out lift a natural lifter all else similar/equal. Obviously some 100lb ultra featherweight guy will still be weaker than some super weight behemoth...steroids affect more than just size of the muscle....I am too lazy to look up specific studies but I am sure you can easily look up studies on strength gains....there are steroids like Winstrol designed specifically for strength gains with very little impact on size.

And in skill sports with weight classes like combat sports, PEDs will increase muscle size, strength, durability, aggression even cardio, but won't directly enhance skill, reaction time, coordination, discipline, etc. Shouldn't be controversial that PEDs provide an advantage but I don't think any amount of gear can turn a mediocre skill sport athlete into a champion unless he already has the attributes needed for success at that level.
Some older research had steroids improving reaction times but newer research supposedly contradicts that now. But I don't know if there's a consensus.

It feels a bit like the old claim of bodybuilders being inflexible and that's just not true. Most bodybiilders simply don't spend time training flexibility which is why most are not particularly flexible or even stiff.

Steroids help with recovery both muscular as well as CNS. If a workout focuses on plyometrics, iso kinetic output, unstable training,etc then it should help .... essentially steroids help with whatever you're training it's just that most people are overly focused on specific athletic aspects(muscle size, strength, etc) and don't train certain others(flexibility, balance, reaction ) and afterwards blame or misattribute athletic deficits to steroid use rather than simply not training or sufficiently working those other variables.
 
Last edited:
With perhaps insanely rare exceptions, a person on gear will out lift a natural lifter all else similar/equal. Obviously some 100lb ultra featherweight guy will still be weaker than some super weight behemoth...steroids affect more than just size of the muscle....I am too lazy to look up specific studies but I am sure you can easily look up studies on strength gains....there are steroids like Winstrol designed specifically for strength gains with very little impact on size.


Some older research had steroids improving reaction times but newer research supposedly contradicts that now. But I don't know if there's a consensus.

It feels a bit like the old claim of bodybuilders being inflexible and that's just not true. Most bodybiilders simply don't spend time training flexibility which is why most are not particularly flexible or even stiff.

Steroids help with recovery both muscular as well as CNS. If a workout focuses on plyometrics, iso kinetic output, unstable training,etc then it should help .... essentially steroids help with whatever you're training it's just that most people are overly focused on specific athletic aspects(muscle size, strength, etc) and don't train certain others(flexibility, balance, reaction ) and afterwards blame or misattribute athletic deficits to steroid use rather than simply not training or sufficiently working those other variables.

Understood and agreed - steroids make an athlete bigger, stronger, faster relative to their trained natty benchmark. But because of the huge range of natty benchmarks across athletes and varying individual responses to steroids, I think it's difficult to say precisely how much impact a PED program has had on an individual athlete's performance in a sport like wrestling or grappling relative to competitors, some (many?) of whom are also on PEDs.

I've always believed that steroids can make a good athlete into a great one, or a great one into elite, but can't make a mediocre athlete with shit genetics, physical attributes and training discipline into Captain America. The most famous user in Lance Armstrong started doping in 1995 after he had already established himself as elite, winning the 1993 world championship with a handful of other great showings, on the back of his extremely high work ethic, natty VO2 max, etc. And that's in a race or strength sport like 100m sprints or powerlifting where steroids provide the most quantifiable benefits. In wrestling or grappling, the best athlete is rarely the strongest or quickest but rather the one with superior technique, timing and strategy.
 
Last edited:
Interesting study and I think it's beyond doubt that being on gear increases hypertrophy and strength gains relative to natty.


But as most do, your cited study concludes that increased gear use increased BOTH muscle size AND strength (measured by leg press in this study). All else equal, a bigger muscle is a stronger muscle so this finding is intuitive.

What I haven't seen many studies on and IMO more interesting, is how does a juiced athlete compare to a natty athlete at the newly enhanced size all else being equal? i.e. if a 170 pound powerlifter gets on test, anavar, deca and gets up to 200 lbs, how would his lifts compare to a natty 200 lbs powerlifter at the same bf %? My sense is the juiced lifter would outperform the natty one i.e. juiced muscle is stronger than same size natty muscle, but there are a lot of variables that would be difficult to equalize.

And in skill sports with weight classes like combat sports, PEDs will increase muscle size, strength, durability, aggression even cardio, but won't directly enhance skill, reaction time, coordination, discipline, etc. Shouldn't be controversial that PEDs provide an advantage but I don't think any amount of gear can turn a mediocre skill sport athlete into a champion unless he already has the necessary attributes for success at that level.
It’s definitely going to affect coordination, fast twitch muscle and all that

That’s why it’s no secret that most fighters juice in the off season.. but if they were to fight blasting 500 Mg like Jon Jones or whoever.. that’s still a massive advantage

Even if the other guy blasts in the office season, he’ll be at a disadvantage fighting at ordinary TRT induced test levels
 
It’s definitely going to affect coordination, fast twitch muscle and all that

That’s why it’s no secret that most fighters juice in the off season.. but if they were to fight blasting 500 Mg like Jon Jones or whoever.. that’s still a massive advantage

Even if the other guy blasts in the office season, he’ll be at a disadvantage fighting at ordinary TRT induced test levels

Understood. Again I'm not saying steroids don't give athletes an advantage. I'm saying that success in skill sports like MMA or grappling also requires many intangibles like skill, game planning, mental attributes, work ethic, "natural athleticism," etc. and I don't believe taking steroids can overcome massive deficiencies in those areas relative to other athletes.

Let me use myself as an example. I'm a nobody but I've trained with and around fighters since the 90's. I have about 20 years total training across wrestling, Judo, BJJ and boxing and competed for years in those rulesets and still do occasional tournaments in wrestling and BJJ which I train 4-5 days/week. But I'm a lifetime scrub with below average to average aptitude for combat sports.

The BJJ/MMA gym I've trained at for 9 years has three high level guys two of whom have 23 fights in the UFC between them. I won't go into detail but I am highly confident one of them was natty throughout his career and the other two not so much. They're all around my size and when their careers were active, I regularly went live with them leading up to, occasionally during fight camps and between fights so I've felt how fast, strong, explosive and skilled they were at various points in their fight prep.

I am convinced beyond any doubt that a hypothetical juiced to the gills version of myself would still get the absolute fuck beaten out of me by a natty version of any of those guys under any ruleset, striking, wrestling or grappling. There's levels to this and I know where I shake out in the pecking order, as does anyone else who has trained and competed for a long time.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top