Elections 26 FBI Informants Present on Jan 6

IIRC it was to the House delegation which is a set of Congressional representatives, one from each state, who are to vote on the next president should there be dispute about the legitimacy of the state electors. At the time the Dems had a majority of the House but not a majority of the House delegation and so the hope was that kicking it to the House delegation could result in a Trump win.

Why would Trump kill the people who helped him stay in power? He ran on pardoning these traitors and won.

I don't think you're following here. The plan wasn't to take Congress hostage, it was to get Congress to overturn the results of the election and specifically to have Pence throw out legitimate Biden electors in favor of his fake ones or to have Pence use the chaos as a pretense to send the matter to the House Delegation which was made up of one rep from each state and thus a slight GOP majority at the time.

I don't think it was state legislatures but rather the House delegation which is made up of one Congressional rep from each state. Honestly I could be getting it wrong because we're getting into very nitty gritty constitutional procedure here. Its precisely this esoteric nature of the plot that allows Trumpers to either play ignorant about it or, in the case of the vast majority, legitimately be ignorant about it. I didn't know about most of this stuff until the wake of Jan 6th and even then only relatively recently.
But by those actions you think they will just say... ok you win let's reverse everything. It literally would never work. Forceful pressure on the govt by those few would accomplish nothing. It was a pointless action with only a bad outcome. You cannot apply pressure that way with police/military backing the govt. It was always a lose lose.
 
He started with a core that was acceptable to the then GOP heirarchy that thought they could put some brakes on his ego. As time went on he filled positions with people more and more loyal to him not only in the Administration but in the GOP as well. By the end of his last administration he wasn't even bothering to get people confirmed and today he has total control of the Party.

Obviously some people are going to be more loyal than others when it comes to Trump's demands and also when it comes to our Country and Constitution. Barr pressed Mueller to end his investigation and then misled the public releasing his own synopsis rather than Mueller's. At the end of the day though he was more loyal to the Constitution when it came to lying over Trump's false claims of election fraud as I'm sure he recognized the dangers of allowing Trump to remain in power without having to actually win the election.

The original AG was also initially a loyalist that was instrumental in getting him elected but he too faced Trump's wrath for putting the Constitution ahead of his demands. By the end of his term there were a total of 7 AGs as he shopped around for someone that would back his election fraud claims and "let him and his friends in Congress take care of the rest".

His current picks have been a joke, and I'll bet you'd burst a blood vessel if Kamala had won and could choose her Cabinet without Senatorial confirmations, but here we are with just that being pushed and names like Patel, Kennedy Jr, Musk, and even Racliffe being considered. You neglected to link to my quote on that last name so if you'd be so kind to.provide it I'll check the context in which I wrote that.
Can't, it's from the thread of the NY Post reporting on Hunter Biden's laptop, where Christopher's Wray's FBI pressured social media platforms to censor and hide the information from voters to rig the election, and responses are locked.

Kash Patel was both a federal defense attorney and a federal prosecutor before Trump was even in politics, has been senior advisor to the national defense secretary, with a certification in international law. How

Musk what? Elon Musk hasn't been nominated for any cabinet position.
 
Ted Cruz among them. Imagine your political opponent calls your wife ugly and instead of being a man and taking a stand you sell your soul out to him to the point that you'd betray the Republic to help him stay in office. What a worm of a human being Ted Cruz is.
He's one of the main people that started turning me off to the Republican party. At the end of the day we have two parties and we need to compromise and respect who the voters elect. Some terms it will be Republicans and some it will be Democrats. Throwing hissy fits and shutting down the government if you don't get your way is toddler level theatrics but when it's government dysfunction you're causing instead of a spill on aisle three it should be a crime.
 
But by those actions you think they will just say... ok you win let's reverse everything. It literally would never work. Forceful pressure on the govt by those few would accomplish nothing. It was a pointless action with only a bad outcome. You cannot apply pressure that way with police/military backing the govt. It was always a lose lose.
Had the plan worked they would've had the backing of the sitting president(i.e. the Commander in Chief of the military) as well as lawmakers in Congress. And had Pence did what Trump asked of him who knows what would've happened. Thankfully Pence was willing to stand up to his president and do the right thing for the country but it was absolutely an attempted coup by Trump that devolved into an insurrection when his little army of traitors stormed the Capitol.
 
I disagree. Nothing positive would come of it. Just getting killed by military/police.... if anything it makes you look extreme. All of these topics have been discussed at nauseum. But ultimately there was no way to win with that approach.
It doesn't mean they didn't try it even if it was impossible. How many times did Trump's WH counsel have to tell him not to think of doing something or he would go to jail and then have to threaten to resign if he continued to press the issue?
 
Had the plan worked they would've had the backing of the sitting president(i.e. the Commander in Chief of the military) as well as lawmakers in Congress. And had Pence did what Trump asked of him who knows what would've happened. Thankfully Pence was willing to stand up to his president and do the right thing for the country but it was absolutely an attempted coup by Trump that devolved into an insurrection when his little army of traitors stormed the Capitol.
Illegal actions taking and get backing from congress? No dude... this was a relatively few idiots that decided to do a stupid thing. I don't buy into the fbi conspiracy at present and don't buy into this one.
 
It doesn't mean they didn't try it even if it was impossible. How many times did Trump's WH counsel have to tell him not to think of doing something or he would go to jail and then have to threaten to resign if he continued to press the issue?
Don't know how much they tried but it's like any guy in a standoff with police. Whatever they think is going to happen... isn't going to happen and won't end well.
 
Illegal actions taking and get backing from congress? No dude... this was a relatively few idiots that decided to do a stupid thing. I don't buy into the fbi conspiracy at present and don't buy into this one.
Its not a conspiracy theory, this is documented. Ted Cruz is the most high profile Republican who was in on the coup attempt but there were others
As Eastman outlined a scenario in which Vice President Mike Pence could deny certifying Biden’s election, Cruz crafted a complementary plan in the Senate. He proposed objecting to the results in six swing states and delaying accepting the Electoral College results on Jan. 6 in favor of a 10-day “audit” — thus potentially enabling GOP state legislatures to overturn the result. Ten other senators backed his proposal, which Cruz continued to advocate on the day rioters attacked the Capitol.
The Jan. 6 committee’s investigators have recently focused on Eastman’s efforts to pressure Pence to declare Trump the winner, but there has been little public notice that Cruz and Eastman have known each other since they clerked together 27 years ago for then-U.S. Appeals Court Judge J. Michael Luttig. Cruz’s proposal ran on a parallel track to Eastman’s memos.

Luttig told The Post that he believes that Cruz — who once said that Luttig was “like a father to me” — played a paramount role in the events leading to Jan. 6.
“Once Ted Cruz promised to object, January 6 was all but foreordained, because Cruz was the most influential figure in the Congress willing to force a vote on Trump’s claim that the election was stolen,” Luttig said in a statement to The Post. “He was also the most knowledgeable of the intricacies of both the Electoral Count Act and the Constitution, and the ways to exploit the two.”
To try to equate the baseless fedsurrection idea with the out in the open conspiracy Trump engaged in to overturn the election is deeply unfair, misguided, and suggests you're not well informed about the details of Trump's plan.
Don't know how much they tried but it's like any guy in a standoff with police. Whatever they think is going to happen... isn't going to happen and won't end well.
Except in this case the people standing off with the police had the backing of the sitting president.
 
I missed that part you highlighted, thanks! As for “Trump told them to [break into the Capitol],” that’s simply not true, so why take it that far?

What did Trump mean by “And we fight. We fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore.”? He said this near the end of his speech right before the march began. Trump did not directly tell them to go into the capital. After whipping the crowd into a frenzy with multiple lie I do believe he had a good idea they would.
 
Last edited:
Its not a conspiracy theory, this is documented. Ted Cruz is the most high profile Republican who was in on the coup attempt but there were others



To try to equate the baseless fedsurrection idea with the out in the open conspiracy Trump engaged in to overturn the election is deeply unfair, misguided, and suggests you're not well informed about the details of Trump's plan.

Except in this case the people standing off with the police had the backing of the sitting president.
Yet Ted Cruz is not in jail....and Trump is back in office..
 
lol, not giving your grifters views. Nobody pushes play on your grifter videos, hoss.

So...

You've still got nothing but knee-jerk reaction of "ThEyreEE nAWWTTT MAAAAAGGAA, So THEryr'eeeee EBILLLLL!!!!!!"


9dyrzs.jpg
 
Yet Ted Cruz is not in jail....
What point do you think that proves? Not even Trump is in jail and he's the mastermind of it all. I would agree that this shows a problem with the DOJ but Trump was able to successfully convince people that the DOJ was "weaponized" for trying to hold him to account for the events of Jan 6th so if anything Cruz was a smaller fish to fry by comparison and thus less likely to be held to account.

Either way its interesting to see you move the goalposts. Once I showed you that there were indeed Congressmen and Senators willing to go along with the plan you have to try to pivot. Why not just face the facts in front of you?
 
The point of Jan 6th was to interrupt the certification of the election. He refers to not certifying the election multiple times in his speech.
With protests maybe but not with invasion and overthrow. It may delay it for a few days but ultimately it would accomplish nothing.
 
What point do you think that proves? Not even Trump is in jail and he's the mastermind of it all. I would agree that this shows a problem with the DOJ but Trump was able to successfully convince people that the DOJ was "weaponized" for trying to hold him to account for the events of Jan 6th so if anything Cruz was a smaller fish to fry by comparison and thus less likely to be held to account.

Either way its interesting to see you move the goalposts. Once I showed you that there were indeed Congressmen and Senators willing to go along with the plan you have to try to pivot. Why not just face the facts in front of you?
So you believe all of this but not that the FBI could have been there encouraging this to happen (not a conspiracy i subscribe to at present)? I'm not doing anything but trying to finish off our discussion. This topic has been beaten to death in here.
 
With protests maybe but not with invasion and overthrow. It may delay it for a few days but ultimately it would accomplish nothing.

Did Trump not tell the crowd to fight like hell right before the march began? This was after filling their heads with numerous lies about the election being stolen. What other result would you expect after all of that? Stopping or delaying the certification was his goal.
 
With protests maybe but not with invasion and overthrow. It may delay it for a few days but ultimately it would accomplish nothing.
Why would Trump need an invasion? He is the sitting president, if he got Congress to overturn the election he stays in power. He had almost a dozen Senators like Ted Cruz willing to go along with his cockamamie scheme and if Pence was in on it too who knows what might've happened. It would've been an unprecedented constitutional crisis.
So you believe all of this but not that the FBI could have been there encouraging this to happen (not a conspiracy i subscribe to at present)? I'm not doing anything but trying to finish off our discussion. This topic has been beaten to death in here.
Yes of course because there's a mountain of evidence for what I'm claiming and there's none for the fedsurrection claims. In fact many of the people involved don't deny that they were involved like Trump himself whose defense in court was not that he didn't do it but that he is entitled to criminal immunity. You're not equating these two claims are you? I've been able to produce evidence of my assertions, has anyone here produced evidence that Feds were present at Jan 6th and instigated the riots? Not that I've seen and in fact the report you cited in the OP suggests the opposite.

At the end of the day you started this thread for some reason, presumably because you want to discuss the topic. Now you're saying its done to death after you yourself started the thread? What sense does that make?
 
Why would Trump need an invasion? He is the sitting president, if he got Congress to overturn the election he stays in power. He had almost a dozen Senators like Ted Cruz willing to go along with his cockamamie scheme and if Pence was in on it too who knows what might've happened. It would've been an unprecedented constitutional crisis.

Yes of course because there's a mountain of evidence for what I'm claiming and there's none for the fedsurrection claims. In fact many of the people involved don't deny that they were involved like Trump himself whose defense in court was not that he didn't do it but that he is entitled to criminal immunity. You're not equating these two claims are you? I've been able to produce evidence of my assertions, has anyone here produced evidence that Feds were present at Jan 6th and instigated the riots? Not that I've seen and in fact the report you cited in the OP suggests the opposite.

At the end of the day you started this thread for some reason, presumably because you want to discuss the topic. Now you're saying its done to death after you yourself started the thread? What sense does that make?
If it was indeed as cut and try as you say then Trump would have been in jail... he wasn't even CHARGED with it until the end of 2023 heading into an election year. Years after the occurrence.... just come on guy.... look back at my first comment. I wasn't on about the conspiracy but on whether the report was just released after the election for a reason possobly not wanting to affect this election. Not hashing up all the conspiracies.. Some in here will def do it anyway because they want to see fbi involvement. Conspiracy of Trump involvement or the converse of the FBI wasn't my original and I'm sure there are plenty of conspiracy guys in here to check in on both sides.
 
If it was indeed as cut and try as you say then Trump would have been in jail... he wasn't even CHARGED with it until the end of 2023 heading into an election year. Years after the occurrence.... just come on guy.... look back at my first comment. I wasn't on about the conspiracy but on whether the report was just released after the election for a reason. Not hashing up all the things. Some in here will def do it anyway because they want to see fbi involvement.
What part of what I'm saying here do you think isn't true? Cruz is on record trying to help overturn the election in favor of Trump. We have Trump's fake electors on video. We know from testimony that Trump was delighted about the break in at the Capitol and we know it took him over three hours to tell them to go home. We know he wanted Pence to reject the legitimate electors in favor of his fake electors, he said as much in the very speech he made before the riot. Here are some excerpts from that speech, what do you think Trump is trying to say here?
And he looked at Mike Pence, and I hope Mike is going to do the right thing. I hope so. I hope so.

Because if Mike Pence does the right thing, we win the election. All he has to do, all this is, this is from the number one, or certainly one of the top, Constitutional lawyers in our country. He has the absolute right to do it. We're supposed to protect our country, support our country, support our Constitution, and protect our constitution.
States want to revote. The states got defrauded. They were given false information. They voted on it. Now they want to recertify. They want it back. All Vice President Pence has to do is send it back to the states to recertify and we become president and you are the happiest people
We're gathered together in the heart of our nation's capital for one very, very basic and simple reason: To save our democracy.
And Mike Pence is going to have to come through for us, and if he doesn't, that will be a, a sad day for our country because you're sworn to uphold our Constitution.
Because you'll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength and you have to be strong. We have come to demand that Congress do the right thing and only count the electors who have been lawfully slated, lawfully slated.
What do you think he means when he says he wants Pence to "do the right thing" and "save our democracy"? What are these "lawfully slated" electors Trump is talking about? Are you really denying that Trump tried to overturn the election when he spent months saying that was what he was trying to do?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,280,174
Messages
58,263,346
Members
175,986
Latest member
BloodandBeer
Back
Top