Elections 26 FBI Informants Present on Jan 6

20 plus "agents" there ARE Paid employees (allegedly "off the clock") that had NO Charges filed against them. Let That Sink In. Selective Prosecution, Weaponized Agents from a Weaponized Agency.
The uncharged agents are On Video encouraging, guiding and leading orderly protesting people where to go through the opened selected doors with pre-planned guidance allegedly from Pelosi's Security Detail.

The guy with the horns...totally innocent trumper./s
The report says informants. I'm sure Trump or Republicans will look into it but for now I have what's on the table. Not speculation.

"The guy with the horns...totally innocent trumper./s"

I dont know what this means bud.
 
I'm not a conspiracy guy so I'm not going into that. My question is.... why did this just come out after the election? Does anyone think this could be so that it didn't cast further doubt and possible affect the election?
What? What's your theory here?
 
The report finished? Remember it was paused for a bit so it wouldn't interfere with ongoing cases. Also, the report actually debunks CTs about the FBI instigating the report, but kooks are taking it the opposite way.
Oh my god this fucking guy. What a compete tool. It’s as if multiple people post as him trying to outdo the other
 
The report finished? Remember it was paused for a bit so it wouldn't interfere with ongoing cases. Also, the report actually debunks CTs about the FBI instigating the report, but kooks are taking it the opposite way.
I never said instigating. I don't remember about the pause or these results now coming to surface. Again if it's nothing then nothing will come of it. I agree that they said in the report that all 26 were there but not on assignment which is also odd but will see.
 
I never said instigating. I don't remember about the pause or these results now coming to surface. Again if it's nothing then nothing will come of it. I agree that they said in the report that all 26 were there but not on assignment which is also odd but will see.
The point of the CT was to claim that the attackers were innocent. It was supposedly just the FBI starting shit. So it was looked into, and found that no, that is false. The only presence was a handful of informants on some of the gangs and others that went on their own. And then you freaks act like that is actually supporting your CT.
 
The point of the CT was to claim that the attackers were innocent. It was supposedly just the FBI starting shit. So it was looked into, and found that no, that is false. The only presence was a handful of informants on some of the gangs and others that went on their own. And then you freaks act like that is actually supporting your CT.
Ok bud... productive as usual...stop being angry Trump won and get back to actual discussion instead of insults....you just troll now....
 
Ok bud... productive as usual...stop being angry Trump won and get back to actual discussion instead of insults....you just troll now....
I think you're trolling with this thread and doing the dumb "you're just mad because my dad won" thing.
 
No? I made points and answered your questions. But you keep spinning.
Why release this info now after 4 years? Why did Biden pardon back to 2014... etc etc.... the questions when they are asked are dismissed by you and attacked because you can't be honest. Anyone would including lefties like Stephen a smith as posted itt. You get outright silly with this stuff and will just post again and again....for no legit reason
 
Why release this info now after 4 years?
Answered that.
Why did Biden pardon back to 2014... etc etc....
Nothing to do with this thread. The theory that it somehow gets Joe off with his evil plan is beyond stupid. I'll also note that before you went off the deep end, I told you that if Biden got the nomination, he'd get smeared with bullshit accusations just like Clinton and hated the same, and you didn't buy it. Now you believe the smears!
the questions when they are asked are dismissed by you and attacked because you can't be honest.
Wrong. And "can't be honest' to you hacks just means "you don't blindly agree with my party." I think making false accusations just because someone makes you mad is low AF.
Anyone would including lefties like Stephen a smith as posted itt. You get outright silly with this stuff and will just post again and again....for no legit reason
What are you talking about? Off your meds?
 
Back
Top