Elections 26 FBI Informants Present on Jan 6

Err said:
How were they not in the crowd but 4 entered the capital.
Click to expand...
Informants aren't Feds. They are people involved with groups that are being investigated. They get pay or reduced charges to inform on their group. If the PBs or OKs had members that informed to the Feds, but they weren't at the Capitol on assignment, how can you pin that on the Feds? Is there any evidence that the three CI's there working for the Feds entered the Capitol or directed others there to breach the building?
 
Fox by the Sea said:
"feds " is colloquially used to define any form of direct or indirect relation with law enforcement. that said, while the source doesn't say it, i am sure there were actual law enforcement officers in the crowd. actual feds, besides the "feds".
Click to expand...
I'm sure your hunch will be proven correct if Trump's Court Mage takes over the FBI. The guy wrote a children's book, that would keep Trump's attention, and made himself a wizard. <36>
 
Darkballs said:
Well we just had the FBI confirm that none of their informants were secret plants aimed to frame the 10,000 MAGA dipshits who rioted and beat the shit out of cops.

So it makes sense that one of russian posters would try to get a lie out to muddy the waters. The dishonest posters are so easy to predict.

So what's the theory Ivan? That the hundreds of trump supporters sitting in jail had no intention to rioting at all until three informants asked them to. Without that, it would have been a peaceful gathering with zero shit smeared on the walls?

But we shouldn't dismiss dishonest threads like this right away. They do serve as a valuable reminder of who the stupid posters are. Just look at the lie in the OP, and then scroll down at all the posters who bought it without question.

Same incels every time.
Click to expand...
I think Cajun is obviously a cool guy and American. Some of the posters in the thread though are obviously not American or rabid Trump supporters.
 
Fox by the Sea said:
you should go on 4chan, tiktok, shit like that.
i haven't read anyone call anyone else a "rat" in years.
that's the goodfellas era and it's long gone.
Click to expand...
GTFOH, the new term for rats/snitches is Feds, seems to me it's more you having an agenda than anything to do with colloquialisms.
 
Cajun said:
It's not as of yet. But why is it now released after the election? Just odd. It's why I said we have to wait and see after Jan. Could there be more to the story? Did they not release this previously so as to not cast doubt and affect this election? I haven't claimed anything but it's odd in it's timing. Is there more to the story that hasn't been released? Who knows....will see
Click to expand...
This is basically a non story if you look at it subjectively. Maybe the timing is because of the election but would you be surprised if Trump's new administration tries to bolster their claims by releasing a scathing report? It's like the Jan 6 committee disbanding after their report. When MAGA took over the House they could go ahead and do their own investigation but not sully the current one.
 
Darkballs said:
You come off as trying to hard.

Soy christian crusader name: Check
Incel character from an Amazon show: Check
Never served in the military: Check
Canadian: Check.

Kinda impossible to flex after all that.
Click to expand...

Hold on, that's a bit much! I mean, one can accuse a chap of many things, but falsely calling someone Canadian crosses the line, eh?

Sorry @irish_thug ! ;)
 
KnightTemplar said:
Hold on, that's a bit much! I mean, one can accuse a chap of many things, but falsely calling someone Canadian crosses the line, eh?

Sorry @irish_thug ! ;)
Click to expand...

Sorry, but the truth must be told.

How about a truce, should people start smearing their shit on the walls in Canada, I won't advocate for their release.
 
LangfordBarrow said:
Anyone Trump has attacked as a scapegoat for his crimes should be considered. What a fucking laugh trying to pin 1/6 on Wray or the FBI.
Click to expand...
And just like that, juries are no longer reliable according to democrats, in 93% democrat DC no less. Whoa, we can't roll the dice on a jury trial in maga country Washington DC, better give blanket preemptive pardons to all our totally non criminal buddies. <lol>
 
LangfordBarrow said:
This is basically a non story if you look at it subjectively. Maybe the timing is because of the election but would you be surprised if Trump's new administration tries to bolster their claims by releasing a scathing report? It's like the Jan 6 committee disbanding after their report. When MAGA took over the House they could go ahead and do their own investigation but not sully the current one.
Click to expand...
Then there was no point in releasing this...If it's nothing then let it sit. Why release anything? Its pointless...
 
Darkballs said:
Sorry, but the truth must be told.

How about a truce, should people start smearing their shit on the walls in Canada, I won't advocate for their release.
Click to expand...

Dude, you're thousands of miles closer to Canada than I am.

I contend that smearing shit all over Trudeau probably wouldn't make him significantly more repellent than he already is. But that's probably a discussion for another time. ;)
 
nostradumbass said:
And just like that, juries are no longer reliable according to democrats, in 93% democrat DC no less. Whoa, we can't roll the dice on a jury trial in maga country Washington DC, better give blanket preemptive pardons to all our totally non criminal buddies. <lol>
Click to expand...
And just like that smears for political gain are OK.
 
Cajun said:
Then there was no point in releasing this...If it's nothing then let it sit. Why release anything? Its pointless...
Click to expand...
First of all this release might just be on time and have nothing to do with the election. If it does though then the purpose would be to release the facts before Trump's Court wizard takes over the agency and disseminates some scathing report that furthers Trump's claims of innocence regarding 1/6. If the FBI was behind 1/6 Wray would be receiving a Trump pardon. It's laughable to think the FBI attempted to further Trump's plan of staying in power and he's somehow upset over it.
 
LangfordBarrow said:
First of all this release might just be on time and have nothing to do with the election. If it does though then the purpose would be to release the facts before Trump's Court wizard takes over the agency and disseminates some scathing report that furthers Trump's claims of innocence regarding 1/6. If the FBI was behind 1/6 Wray would be receiving a Trump pardon. It's laughable to think the FBI attempted to further Trump's plan of staying in power and he's somehow upset over it.
Click to expand...
After 4 years? I'm not saying anyone is upset. Just that it's odd or CYA. Will see I guess what comes out. If it's nothing then it is what it is....
 
LangfordBarrow said:
And just like that smears for political gain are OK.
Click to expand...
You mean the entire democrat platform? I wonder why they didn't give preemptive blanket pardons to their whole criminal organization in 2016, but feel the need to now, even though they totally didn't do nothin, and the incoming president is the same guy who won in 2016.
 
Last edited:
Cajun said:
The report, from the justice department's Office of the Inspector General, found that 26 "confidential human sources" - or paid informants - were in Washington on the day of the riot.
Three of them had been tasked with gathering information for domestic terrorism cases who might have been going to the rallies on 6 January, one of whom entered the Capitol building.

The remaining 23 had not been directed to be in the area and did so on their own initiative.
At the time, some were in contact or travelling with members of far-right groups including the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers.

Of the 26 in total, four confidential sources entered the Capitol during the riot. Another 13 entered the restricted area around the Capitol - a security perimeter established in preparation for election certification on 6 January.
None of the confidential sources who entered the Capitol or its environs were among those criminally charged with trespassing.
Click to expand...

20 plus "agents" there ARE Paid employees (allegedly "off the clock") that had NO Charges filed against them. Let That Sink In. Selective Prosecution, Weaponized Agents from a Weaponized Agency.
The uncharged agents are On Video encouraging, guiding and leading orderly protesting people where to go through the opened selected doors with pre-planned guidance allegedly from Pelosi's Security Detail.

The guy with the horns...totally innocent trumper./s
 
That's a whole lot of FBI Informants not being directed to be there... that were there. If you don't think that's sketchy... you're a clown.

Why this information was not shared by / to the January 6 Committee is also sketchy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,254,672
Messages
56,664,227
Members
175,336
Latest member
Swamps

Share this page

Back
Top