Elections 2020 Candidate Matching (ISideWith)

Trotsky

Trotsky

Banned
Banned
Joined
May 20, 2016
Messages
34,432
Reaction score
15,875
We're inching closer to 2020, with an historically crowded Democratic field, and ISideWith has a really ludicrously comprehensive system of matching up persons to candidates and parties. It will take you at least a good 10 minutes (more like 30 if you want to get the most accurate result and answer all of the questions, which I highly recommend), but I think it's a really well-done program.

And, of course, if you have questions or want to discuss certain questions from the test to help

@HockeyBjj @xcvbn @Fawlty


My results were as follows.

Candidates:
95% - Bernie Sanders
93% - Elizabeth Warren
92% - Tulsi Gabbard
92% - Beto O'Rourke
92% - Kamala Harris
91% - Julian Castro
91% - Pete Buttigieg
89% - Cory Booker
89% - Kirsten Gillibrand
89% - Andrew Yang
86% - Amy Klobuchar
72% - Joe Biden
25% - Donald Trump​

Parties:
Socialist - 92%
Green - 88%
Democratic - 86%
Libertarian - 44%
Republican - 11%​

As you can expect, it's a little less exact for figures whose legislative/policy history is less detailed: for instance, if positions were more exact, I would likely have less in common with Beto O'Rourke and more in common with Andrew Yang. But it's still about as comprehensive and accurate a match system as can be feasibly expected

https://www.isidewith.com/political-quiz
 
Last edited:
I just want Mark Cuban to run with Julian Castro as his VP. Then I know for absolute certainty that the universe is sentient and likes to play jokes on all of its creations.
 
ITT we learn that Trotsky is 1/4th in favour of Donald Trump and his policies.
 
Mine keeps flashing Make America Great Again.

Weird...
 
Trotsky said:
We're inching closer to 2020, with an historically crowded Democratic field, and ISideWith has a really ludicrously comprehensive system of matching up persons to candidates and parties. It will take you a good 10 minutes (more like 30 if you want to get the most accurate result and answer all of the questions), but I think it's a really well-done program.

And, of course, if you have questions or want to discuss certain questions from the test to help

@HockeyBjj @xcvbn @Fawlty


My results were as follows.

Candidates:
95% - Bernie Sanders
93% - Elizabeth Warren
92% - Tulsi Gabbard
92% - Beto O'Rourke
92% - Kamala Harris
91% - Julian Castro
91% - Pete Buttigieg
89% - Cory Booker
89% - Kirsten Gillibrand
89% - Andrew Yang
86% - Amy Klobuchar
72% - Joe Biden
25% - Donald Trump​

Parties:
Socialist - 92%
Green - 88%
Democratic - 86%
Libertarian - 44%
Republican - 11%​

As you can expect, it's a little less exact for figures whose legislative/policy history is less detailed: for instance, if positions were more exact, I would likely have less in common with Beto O'Rourke and more in common with Andrew Yang. But it's still about as comprehensive and accurate a match system as can be feasibly expected

https://www.isidewith.com/political-quiz
Click to expand...
You side 92% with Beta "Mickey" Rourke... cool.

Here's Beta Rourke:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ny...cs/beto-orourke-el-paso-texas-senate.amp.html

Not only had he married the investor’s daughter, but as a member of City Council, he represented the targeted area, including a historic Mexican-American neighborhood.

Calling downtown “one piece of El Paso that was missing on the road back to greatness,” Mr. O’Rourke, now a congressman and the Democratic candidate for Senate in Texas, voted to take the first step forward with the plan.

Over the next two years, Mr. O’Rourke would defend the plan before angry barrio residents and vote to advance it. At other times, he would abstain. Business owners who opposed the plan accused Mr. O’Rourke of a conflict, citing the involvement of his father-in-law, the billionaire developer William D. Sanders.

Twelve years later, Mr. O’Rourke is championing progressive causes, attracting millions of dollars from small donors across the country and eschewing political action committee money in what he calls a grass-roots effort to unseat Ted Cruz, the Republican incumbent, in one of the most closely watched Senate races in the midterms. Polls show Mr. Cruz with a modest lead.

“Mr. O’Rourke was basically the pretty face of this very ugly plan against our most vulnerable neighborhoods,” said David Dorado Romo, a local historian who added that the episode had resurrected longstanding race and class divisions in the city.

Barrio residents feared that they would lose their homes through eminent domain, and a city-funded branding study suggested that the residents of El Paso were perceived as “dirty” and “lazy.’’ Among some constituents, the hurt feelings have lingered.
Click to expand...
This dude fucked over brown poor people, and was cool with declaring eminent domain over their shit. These people fought tooth and nail not to be displaced and he told them to kick rocks.

Beta Rourke is another, on a laundry list of Democrats, FRAUD. His name isn't even Beto LMAO. This fuckstick is named Robert Francis and grew up a true privileged white boy who was molded into politics to deceive and fuck over minorities.

I would shit all over that Cuck Bernie, Pocahontas and Clueless Tulsa Gabb but that's been done enough.

This list of Democraps is a veritable who's who of fucking LOSERS LOL! Sad!

Watching them get shit on by the GOAT Trump is going to be glorious.

Favoriting this thread so I can bump it with my massive boner upon reelection, with sweet anticipation for dispersing a giant load over you bitches for FOUR MORE YEARS of anguish and torment.
 
Last edited:
Warlord Palis said:
You side 92% with Beta "Mickey" Rourke... cool.

Here's Beta Rourke:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ny...cs/beto-orourke-el-paso-texas-senate.amp.html


This dude fucked over brown poor people, and was cool with declaring eminent domain over their shit. These people fought tooth and nail not to be displaced and he told them to kick rocks.

Beta Rourke is another, on a laundry list of Democrats, FRAUD. His name isn't even Beto LMAO. This fuckstick is named Robert Francis and grew up a true privileged white boy who was molded into politics to deceive and fuck over minorities.

I would shit all over that Cuck Bernie, Pocahontas and Clueless Tulsa Gabb but that's been done enough.

This list of Democraps is a veritable who's who of fucking LOSERS LOL! Sad!

Watching them get shit on by the GOAT Trump is going to be glorious.

Favoriting this thread so I can bump it with my massive boner up reelection, with sweet anticipation for dispersing a giant load over you bitches for FOUR MORE YEARS of anguish and torment.
Click to expand...
<Rodgers1><bball2>
 
My Parties:

91% Libertarian
69% Constitution
65% Republican
45% Socialist
40% Green
19% Democratic

My Ballot:

56% John Delaney (Democrat)
49% Tulsi Gabbard (Democrat)
49% Robert O'Rourke (Democrat)
49% John Kasich (Republican)
42% Kamala Harris (Democrat)
42% Bernard Sanders (Democrat)
40% Donald Trump (Republican)
39% Julian Castro (Democrat)
38% Cory Booker (Democrat)
37% Peter Buttigieg (Democrat)
37% Andrew Yang (Democrat)
36% Elizabeth Warren (Democrat)
30% Kirsten Gillibrand (Democrat)
30% Amy Klobuchar (Democrat)
23% Joseph Biden (Democrat)
 
Last edited:
89% constitution, 7% socialist, 6% democrat. I think I only got any percentage socialist democrat cause I said I wouldn't mind some money being spent on public transportation. They barely brought up healthcare which is the most socialist thing I could get on board with and only asked if insurance should let people with no insurance sign up after they catch something.

https://www.isidewith.com/profile/3736062542/parties

Edit: How the eff is anybody anything percent aligned with Beta o'rourke? The guy doesn't even have any policies and his campaign website is a merch store.
 
Last edited:
nostradumbass said:
89% constitution, 7% socialist, 6% democrat. I think I only got any percentage socialist democrat cause I said I would mind some money being spent on public transportation. They barely brought up healthcare which is the most socialist thing I could get on board with and only asked if insurance should let people with no insurance sign up after they catch something.

https://www.isidewith.com/profile/3736062542/parties
Click to expand...
I think you and I might be two of the most closely ideologically aligned posters here. I'm guessing you went harder-line on immigration in the quiz than I did, which gave you a higher Constitution Party score and me a higher Libertarian score. I voted for the Constitution Party's nominee for prez in 2016.
 
Wow. What a surprise. Here’s mine:

Candidates:
0% - Bernie Sanders
0% - Elizabeth Warren
0% - Tulsi Gabbard
0% - Beto O'Rourke
0% - Kamala Harris
0% - Julian Castro
0% - Pete Buttigieg
0% - Cory Booker
0% - Kirsten Gillibrand
20% - Andrew Yang
0% - Amy Klobuchar
0% - Joe Biden
91% - Donald Trump
100% - Stacey Abrams
 
waiguoren said:
I think you and I might be two of the most closely ideologically aligned posters here. I'm guessing you went harder-line on immigration in the quiz than I did, which gave you a higher Constitution Party score and me a higher Libertarian score. I voted for the Constitution Party's nominee for prez in 2016.
Click to expand...
Might be. I did the "more choices" answers for the Muslim migration and said families are fine but single men should take a backseat. I had no idea it was even controversial to think that if a country is so dangerous that men need refugee status, they probably shouldn't leave their wives and children there while they flock to nicer places.
 
Last edited:
Apparently I am 79% aligned with something called the Women's Equality Party.

Huh.
 
nostradumbass said:
Might be. I did the "more choices" answers for the Muslim migration and said families are fine but single men should take a backseat.
Click to expand...
Have you ever looked into the Constitution Party? Ever voted for anyone from their party?
 
Big group from 86-90% in descending order: Tulsi (lulz), Harris, Booker, Warren, Sanders, Klobuchar, Buttigieg, Castro, Gillibrand, and Beto. 31% Trump. (bolded candidates I like)

Parties: 86% Dem, 83% Green, 82% Socialist, 35% Libertarian, 22% Republican


It seems reasonable and some of the additional questions were a little difficult to answer, both in a good and bad way.
 
waiguoren said:
Have you ever looked into the Constitution Party? Ever voted for anyone from their party?
Click to expand...
I've never voted. I was living in Hawaii in 2016 so that would have been pointless. My sisters both voted for Egg McMuffin even though they knew there was 0 chance of him winning. I probably would if there was a candidate who had a chance of winning.
 
Parties:

Italian Fascist 99% (kidding)

Constitution 90%
Republican 90%
Libertarian 54%
Peace and Freedom 10% (what the fuck)
Democratic 9%
Socialist 5% (no, no, no, no, NOOOOOOOOO!!!!! FUCK FUCK FUUUUUCK!!!!)
Green 5% (get me a tranquilizer)

Candidates:

Donald Trump 79% (meh)
John Kasich 74% (ahole)
John Delaney 44% (who?)
Joe Biden 29% (Joe if you touch me again then you will lose a hand.)
Tulsi Gabbard 21% (meh)
 
JamesRussler said:
Wow. What a surprise. Here’s mine:

Candidates:
0% - Bernie Sanders
0% - Elizabeth Warren
0% - Tulsi Gabbard
0% - Beto O'Rourke
0% - Kamala Harris
0% - Julian Castro
0% - Pete Buttigieg
0% - Cory Booker
0% - Kirsten Gillibrand
20% - Andrew Yang
0% - Amy Klobuchar
0% - Joe Biden
91% - Donald Trump
100% - Stacey Abrams
Click to expand...



{<jordan}


MFW I got to spacy abrams...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,280,859
Messages
58,322,165
Members
176,000
Latest member
Markooz86

Share this page

Back
Top