2018 PotWR Round 4: Semi-Elimination Ballot

[Cubo de Sangre]

Be honest. I have enough respect for you to know that you can tell that SBJJ is of below-average intelligence and a raging partisan and that Fawlty is in the top 1% here.

1% at what? Insulting people who disagree? Yeah, he's the biggest asshole along with Homer in the last number of years for sure. In terms of intelligent discussion I must just intimidate him from bringing his A-game. I've never seen anything terribly impressive. Help him find a subject to school me on. Then find something to inflate his balls. I'm around.

 

[Trotsky]

Be honest. I have enough respect for you to know that you can tell that SBJJ is of below-average intelligence and a raging partisan and that Fawlty is in the top 1% here.

 

[Fawlty]

What's kind of legitimately sad is that you know that more than anything Cubo yearns for the respect of people like Fawlty and Trotsky. He gets praise from people like SBJJ but he knows it's hollow and would go to any Republican. He's like Saliari--smart enough to know he's not one of the top posters but not smart enough to be one, and it tortures him. The solution is to try to up his game, but to improve in any way requires acknowledging that he's not already perfect, which he cannot do. Tragic all around.

It's like this:






Divided by this:

 

[luckyshot]

Alright dudes, I'ma sleep. Anyone who insults me while I am sleeping tacitly admits to hating sleep.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

I think you also know that that's ridiculous. I give you credit for feeling some shame defending some of the more out-there GOP propaganda.

I call you a liar in this thread, challenged you to a number of bets, and you did what? Got yourself timed out for telling me to kill myself, that's what.

 

[Jack V Savage]

1% at what? Insulting people who disagree? Yeah, he's the biggest asshole along with Homer in the last number of years for sure. In terms of intelligent discussion I must just intimidate him from bringing his A-game. I've never seen anything terribly impressive. Help him find a subject to school me on. Then find something to inflate his balls. I'm around.

I mean, you can pick whatever subject you want, but I do not believe that I'm saying anything you disagree with, though I recognize that it's stuff you feel averse to admitting.

 

[Jack V Savage]

I call you a liar in this thread, challenged you to a number of bets, and you did what? Got yourself timed out for telling me to kill myself, that's what.

But nothing I said was untrue, much less knowingly untrue. And you know that. You just made the character attack because you felt bad. In more civilized times, calling someone a liar without cause would get you at least called to duel. That's illegal now so you know what the honorable course is.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

I mean, you can pick whatever subject you want,

I tried. He said strong things in a thread about locking up Assange. I asked about his values and priorities. Know what I got?

Spoiler

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

But nothing I said was untrue, much less knowingly untrue.

Yet you dick-tucked when push came to shove. Hardly the actions of a confident man. I mean, it's not like you don't have the time. You chase me around arguing the same Hilary shit for two years now. You're a skipping record stuck in a grove.

 

[Jack V Savage]

Yet you dick-tucked when push came to shove. Hardly the actions of a confident man. I mean, it's not like you don't have the time. You chase me around arguing the same Hilary shit for two years now. You're a skipping record stuck in a grove.

The matter was settled factually a while ago. You just aren't willing to admit it, even after giving your word that you would. You just created a CT to explain away the facts that were not what you expected.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

The matter was settled factually a while ago. You just aren't willing to admit it, even after giving your word that you would. You just created a CT to explain away the facts that were not what you expected.

I love you, man. Thanks for being here.

 

[Fawlty]

I tried. He said strong things in a thread about locking up Assange. I asked about his values and priorities. Know what I got?

I can't tell if you're an idiot or a liar.

First I said this in the Assange thread:

I want him to face charges if he has committed espionage against the U.S., and everything indicates to me that he has. Let's see the charges.

Which is quite self-explanatory. Your retarded ass then tried to make something irrelevant of that which I ignored.


Then you followed up in one of these POTWR threads, where I answered by saying this:

Remind me, I don't remember principles coming into it. In the latest Assange thread, about whether he should be prosecuted or whatever, I said I want to see the charges, though I think it's really likely that he can and will be charged with crimes related to espionage and election interference, especially as more details come out suggesting he was a go-between for Russian intelligence and the Trump campaign.

Your stupid question was answered. Sorry if I didn't think your trying to interrogate me about "principles" was relevant.

 

[Headkicktoleg]

Where is @Lowmanproblems vote?

 

[Jack V Savage]

Your stupid question was answered. Sorry if I didn't think your trying to interrogate me about "principles" was relevant.

Phony calls for debate are another consistent feature of this clown. We all know that it Cubo argued not only that Clinton should have been arrested after being cleared by the investigation but that she *was* arrested and convicted and was currently in prison, SBJJ would call that a win.

 

[LMP]

Where is @Lowmanproblems vote?

@Clippy

 

[Headkicktoleg]

@Clippy

 

[N13]

Hey man, by the rules of post #519, itt, you were not allowed to insult me while I was out playing and getting ma drunk on. Not cool.

But now I'm back (and not yet) passed out.

So to your point: I had the sticky thread for THREE DAYS.

I made three joke threads.

My threads had more views per day than any other Sticky in WR history (@Lead I just made that up, but I'm like 70% sure it's true.)

I challenge anyone to tell me right now what a better use of THREE days of sticky thread access would have been.

Did I win PotWR yet?

To win you are going to need to distance yourself from the stooges.

Check out the first three days of these. Then you won't feel bad at all.
http://forums.sherdog.com/threads/spooking-with-truth-thread.3647655/
The first one grew too large, so Volume 2 was necessary.
http://forums.sherdog.com/threads/spooking-with-truth-volume-2.3823767/unread

I've been thinking about you, all good too. When I see something in the sacred texts for you, I'll let you know. Not enough people take it seriously these days and if they do, they find it hard to translate them into the now. I'm getting better at itt.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

I can't tell if you're an idiot or a liar.

First I said this in the Assange thread:



Which is quite self-explanatory. Your retarded ass then tried to make something irrelevant of that which I ignored.


Then you followed up in one of these POTWR threads, where I answered by saying this:




Your stupid question was answered. Sorry if I didn't think your trying to interrogate me about "principles" was relevant.

Thanks. Feel better? Maybe a nice glass of milk and an Oreo to simmer you down?

I don't recall seeing that in the POTWR thread. Why didn't you just answer where appropriate?

Remind me, I don't remember principles coming into it.

Principles came into it when I asked you about them and yours. But you haven't spoken on any so right now I just figure you have none. Not my job to read your mind. From a smart person who is not a condescending douche, I anticipate the discussion to involve the principles of free speech, free press, jurisdictional limits, and foreigner's obligation to follow US demands even though not on US soil.

Now look at your response and tell me where I'm supposed to be impressed? You just say what you want. You don't say what it's based on. It's than inability or unwillingness to drill down that prevents me from thinking you're anywhere near the top of the class around here.

 

[Fawlty]

Phony calls for debate are another consistent feature of this clown. We all know that it Cubo argued not only that Clinton should have been arrested after being cleared by the investigation but that she *was* arrested and convicted and was currently in prison, SBJJ would call that a win.

He should at least have the honesty to concede that in those posts I'm arguing for 3 important principles: the rule of law, due process, and protection of democracy. Maybe he will now that he's been cornered?

 

[N13]

What's kind of legitimately sad is that you know that more than anything Cubo yearns for the respect of people like Fawlty and Trotsky. He gets praise from people like SBJJ but he knows it's hollow and would go to any Republican. He's like Saliari--smart enough to know he's not one of the top posters but not smart enough to be one, and it tortures him. The solution is to try to up his game, but to improve in any way requires acknowledging that he's not already perfect, which he cannot do. Tragic all around.