2018 PotWR Round 4: Semi-Elimination Ballot

[Starman]

You're welcome. And thanks for follow up questions. It tells me you're looking to fully consider your decision. Here's a list of stuff I tend to comment on around here. You decide which side each belief belongs to.

• Pro-Constitution as it keeps the federal government in line.
• Guns are my hobby and I support the Bill of Rights like there's no tomorrow.
• Pro-choice (but I'm over those arguments and avoid those threads).
• Pro keeping government free from religious influence.
• Pro policies that support nuclear families.
• Secure the borders.
• Voter ID is reasonable.
• A border wall is not (I say use drones and interdiction teams).
• End the fucking drug war.
• End private prisons.
• End civil asset forefiture.
• Pro environment (pollution is just littering nobody is held responsible for).
• Balancing the budget isn't necessary in our monetary system.
• The most decision-making power we can leave to the individual the better.
• Fuck PC bullshit.
• Fuck getting people fired because they said something you didn't like on social media.

That good?

Yes, and thank you. Obviously I don't agree with any of your left-wing positions, but they are outweighed by your conservative positions.

Where do you stand on Mr. Russler's policies for the war room?

 

[Starman]

I have no idea why you did it, but the claims you made didn't add up.

Didn't add up how?

Yeah, this is the environment that Cubo is cultivating. Not sure how this guy isn't banned yet. And if he were actually a professor, that kind of attitude would make it impossible for students to get a fair shake.

How so? English students don't get graded on political opinions.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

You claimed that after law enforcement cleared Clinton, she should have been arrested anyway. That is, you wanted to scrap rule of law because you were concerned that your party might lose the election.

Quote feature. It's a thing. You do a poor job of paraphrasing my arguments and the voters deserve better than you spamming your propaganda. Show what I actually said if you want to discuss it honestly.

Here's how it works. Like when I want to show me owning you on the Warren issue I just pull this up. People can see what really happened. Not the story you tell to save face. Now you try.

 

[WalkenWouldOwn]

Clippy coming on strong!!!!














I voted for lucky.

 

[Jack V Savage]

Didn't add up how?

No one at what you said was your department had been there the amount of time you said you were, for one thing.

How so? English students don't get graded on political opinions.

But you clearly define yourself as a man by your political hatred, and you direct it toward anyone who doesn't agree with you.

That's the difference between Lucky and Cubo, I think. One guy likes intelligent dissent, and the other thinks if he and his supporters act dickish enough, they can discourage people who disagree with them from participating.

 

[Jack V Savage]

Quote feature. It's a thing. You do a poor job of paraphrasing my arguments and the voters deserve better than you spamming your propaganda. Show what I actually said if you want to discuss it honestly.

Here's how it works. Like when I want to show me owning you on the Warren issue I just pull this up. People can see what really happened. Not the story you tell to save face. Now you try.

Again, are you denying it? If you admit that your views are what they are, why do I have to go through the trouble? And I don't believe you even think you looked good in the Warren thing. But I recognize that you won't publicly question the GOP narrative.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

Yes, and thank you. Obviously I don't agree with any of your left-wing positions, but they are outweighed by your conservative positions.

Where do you stand on Mr. Russler's policies for the war room?

You're welcome. Thanks.

Sorry I forgot the Russler part. Look, I loved his platform. I've got a "fuck the man" attitude. I also believe that this forum works because we all come here an lend traffic. People shouldn't get drummed out unfairly due to the bias of moderators.

That said, there's nothing I feel comfortable in promising because I'll have no legit authority over those things. But if I do my job right and prove to be fair no matter the poster's leanings then I'd hope I could go to bat for someone and get results. And as you've seen, @JamesRussler is fully on team Cubo. He has any open position in the cabinet he wants. I'd love him there to help me help him follow through with his goals, because if things go as I hope then I'm gonna be ass-deep in keeping sticky-threads going and properly policed.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

Again, are you denying it?

You quoted nothing to confirm or deny. Stop wasting people's time.

 

[Starman]

No one at what you said was your department had been there the amount of time you said you were, for one thing.

What department did I say I was in? And which staff members are you referring to?

But you clearly define yourself as a man by your political hatred, and you direct it toward anyone who doesn't agree with you.

I don't hate people, only ideologies. Specifically, leftism because leftism itself is hateful, spiteful, mean, jealous, and destructive. As for English students, again, they aren't graded on their political opinions. How they feel about politics isn't important. Whether they are able to read, write, listen, and speak is.

That's the difference between Lucky and Cubo, I think. One guy likes intelligent dissent, and the other thinks if he and his supporters act dickish enough, they can discourage people who disagree with them from participating.

The dickish part is describing you and your leftwing hack friends, correct? Just so we're clear. Because you are one of the most consistent dicks on this forum. As for partisanship, you are unsurpassed in that realm as well.

 

[N13]

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

@Jack V Savage, let me show what I'm talking about on how to build a discussion around facts.

You question my character and express distrust of how I'll run the sticky-threads, yeah?

What do you make of the one time @luckyshot got a chance to make one? Is that a good use? What does it say about him that he took the opportunity to do nothing but aggrandize himself? Some call that a track record and true colors. Entertain us with whatever litany of excuses you can concoct. I'm here all day, unlike other campaigns.

I'll spot you excuse number one. It was a joke.

Sure. An attention-seeking joke that showed zero respect for the position of President.

 

[sickc0d3r]

We need a @Cubo de Sangre and @luckyshot finale, the war room can’t lose with either of those guys.

That said, as much as I am a fan of lucky and I hope there will be no hard feelings, Cubo's got my vote.

When he says he'll go out of his way to show hospitality to his sherbros and gals, he means it. I’ve met him, he's the genuine article, he tells a mean story, he's smart as a whip, and he drinks well above his weight class. His wife is also lovely and might be even smarter than he is (which is saying something). I'm proud to call him a buddy, and he'd make a great POTWR.

It's been a fun race so far, keep it up, and best of luck to all the candidates.

 

[Sketch]

Go on.....

And can you tell me about Mr. Savage too.

It's actually not that interesting. Fawltya story is like a dr Seuss book.

I have no idea why you did it, but the claims you made didn't add up.





Yeah, this is the environment that Cubo is cultivating. Not sure how this guy isn't banned yet. And if he were actually a professor, that kind of attitude would make it impossible for students to get a fair shake.

If I were you, I'd extend an olive branch.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

We need a @Cubo de Sangre and @luckyshot finale, the war room can’t lose with either of those guys.

That said, as much as I am a fan of lucky and I hope there will be no hard feelings, Cubo's got my vote.

When he says he'll go out of his way to show hospitality to his sherbros and gals, he means it. I’ve met him, he's the genuine article, he tells a mean story, he's smart as a whip, and he drinks well above his weight class. His wife is also lovely and might be even smarter than he is (which is saying something). I'm proud to call him a buddy, and he'd make a great POTWR.

It's been a fun race so far, keep it up, and best of luck to all the candidates.

Legit choked up, bro. <brb>

 

[Sketch]

The end game for Team Cubo appears to be to try to insult away dissent. If you make it unpleasant for people who don't agree with you, you guys think you can build an echo chamber and not have to deal with uncomfortable ideas. That's pretty much the opposite of what we should be striving for.

You and your cronies are the echo chamber. The people will speak up against you. Your republic is rotten to the core and will be dismantled for all to see.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

You and your cronies are the echo chamber.

His next move is to accuse you of what he is, partisan. Or he'll just dismiss you as a loon or a kook.

 

[SBJJ]

I always find it weird when a fighter clearly loses a fight yet acts as if he was robbed afterwards

I am now witnessing that in WR form. It's a funny thing to watch

 

[Sketch]

His next move is to accuse you of what he is, partisan. Or he'll just dismiss you as a loon or a kook.

His go to with me is to ignore me outright. Him @Fawlty and @Trotsky ignore me on the regular. The three stooges run from me. And now they will pay the price.

 

[syct23]

...

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

His go to with me is to ignore me outright. Him @Fawlty and @Trotsky ignote me on the regular. The three stooges run from me. And now they will pay the price.

@Trotsky will make an honest effort with me. Jack will engage, but do his bullshit dances and never admit I have a point or could be right. @Fawlty chases me off with abrasiveness, which goes to show the confidence he has in his intellect.