Will you link me to the video in your av?paul ryan sending an urgent email saying they must not give clinton a blank check. i guess hes past worried of losing the presidential election and worried about losing the house and senate.
Will you link me to the video in your av?paul ryan sending an urgent email saying they must not give clinton a blank check. i guess hes past worried of losing the presidential election and worried about losing the house and senate.
paul ryan sending an urgent email saying they must not give clinton a blank check. i guess hes past worried of losing the presidential election and worried about losing the house and senate.
Compared to a woman who privatized her influence in a very high position of power within the government to act on behalf of foreign actors and governments?
I get it. Trump says and does stupid stuff. The entire debacle with Khan shows how flawed he is. But nothing he has said can ever match the sheer quantity of what Hillary has actually done. What she did should be considered treason, if the pattern of behavior (donating to the Clinton Foundation for a favorable government outcome) can be determined. And that's just the Clinton Foundation. Granted, it's on a whole different scale than the email scandal, but even the email scandal was on a whole different level than Trump being a thin-skinned meanie.
it starts around 5:30Will you link me to the video in your av?
sounds like its every man for himself in this election.Bullshit. He just wants to be the person signing the check
There isn't a comparison in terms of experience in government. That is absolutely true.The comparison is that there is no comparison. There is zero chance Trump should be allowed anywhere near the White House or any office compared to basically anyone in fucking America.
Gary Johnson 2016, anyways. Vote 3rd party. Stop this two party nonsense.
it starts around 5:30
sounds like its every man for himself in this election.
There isn't a comparison in terms of experience in government. That is absolutely true.
There also isn't a comparison in terms of abusing government powers for personal benefit. That's even worse than being inexperienced. Obama was inexperienced but he wasn't this damn dirty. If Hillary did take foreign bribes for favorable government influence, there could hardly be a more treasonous act.
The comparison is that there is no comparison. There is zero chance Trump should be allowed anywhere near the White House or any office compared to basically anyone in fucking America.
Gary Johnson 2016, anyways. Vote 3rd party. Stop this two party nonsense.
People like you and a few others who lean right or center on a lot of issues have my respect for rejecting Trump in appropriately strong terms. For anybody who despises Hillary and would gladly take literally any sane republican, it's a tough but necessary pill to swallow. People who support Trump aren't fit to lick your guys' socks.No, not just inexperience. Gross personal defects and general character flaws that have shown up throughout his life.
I'm fine with saying #NeverHillary or whatever you want, but dude, we cannot have Donald Trump as President or anything close to it.
Another poster posted this http://www.newsweek.com/2016/08/12/donald-trumps-business-failures-election-2016-486091.html -- the important thing in this article has nothing to do with the businesses failing or not, it has to do with Trump's character and behavior leading to those failures and responding to those failures and we are seeing this EXACT person in this election. This isn't an attempt to defame or attack him, it's just talking about him honestly. Trump still hasn't learned even the most basic policy. He never will.
But this is a clear pattern.... it doesn't matter what I say, I won't need to explain anything in another month or so, Trump might not even be in the race. He will continue to be who he is and expose himself nationally. Unfortunately, the other candidate sucks too... vote 3rd party.
If you really want to stop the 2 party system then you should probably elect Trump. If you vote 3rd party then Hillary wins. Trump fades away and the Republican establishment reasserts control over the party. Bernie's "revolution" becomes a footnote and the Democratic establishment continues to assert control. Tada...two party system back in control and stronger than ever.
Elect Trump and both parties continue to split and that would give you the best opportunity to add a viable 3rd party in future elections.
People like you and a few others who lean right or center on a lot of issues have my respect for rejecting Trump in appropriately strong terms. For anybody who despises Hillary and would gladly take literally any sane republican, it's a tough but necessary pill to swallow. People who support Trump aren't fit to lick your guys' socks.
Definitely not. That might not just destroy the 2 party system but the entire nation and I fucking live here.
What exactly would destroy the entire nation?
Do you not watch Trump speak? He doesn't know anything about anything. He just talks shit - which is amusing, it's funny, it's great, but YOU CAN'T BE PRESIDENT and have real power and be so narcissistic and delusional and controlling. I thought he could win this if he just took the time to learn any policy, but he still knows less than I do and I can't even fucking read well. He lies, exaggerates, gets offended at the smallest thing, cannot let personal grudges go, does anything to promote his name, only cares about himself... this person with real power, representing our nation... who knows what could happen. I have no idea what exactly it would be, but he won't even make it to the election I don't think. Just since the convention, he's totally imploded when he could have just not said anything and been much better off. He'll destroy himself by being himself before we get a chance to see, but I'm 100% sure this would be a total disaster.
The best possible outcome with a Trump presidency would be that the leak about offering Kasich control over domestic and foreign policy as VP is true and that someone other than Trump will be making all the decisions. I don't know anything about Mike Pence, he might have reprehensible policy choices, but he's not Trump. The problem is, even believing that, you have to believe that Trump has the self-restraint to let another person make decisions that he could possibly make, and I don't see that at all. He'll be threatening other countries, doing who knows what in no time. Putin or anyone, really, could manipulate him into making a total ass of himself and he'll want to start a war over it because HE'S FUCKING CRAZY.
I see. Well I guess I just don't share that level of alarm. When you look at what the norm you see a destabilized middle east, terrorism everywhere, a terrible economy, $20 trillion in debt, wall street/bank/corporate stranglehold on our politicians, corruption to no end, a divided populace on every front...that is what "qualified" office holders like Barack Obama, George Bush, Hillary Clinton. Yet Trump is going to be the one to destroy the nation??
There are so many ways Trump could do better than them. However...I don't see where he could do much worse. The bar is already on the ground.
If you really want to stop the 2 party system then you should probably elect Trump. If you vote 3rd party then Hillary wins. Trump fades away and the Republican establishment reasserts control over the party. Bernie's "revolution" becomes a footnote and the Democratic establishment continues to assert control. Tada...two party system back in control and stronger than ever.
Elect Trump and both parties continue to split and that would give you the best opportunity to add a viable 3rd party in future elections.
During a 33-year career at the Central Intelligence Agency, I served presidents of both parties — three Republicans and three Democrats. I was at President George W. Bush’s side when we were attacked on Sept. 11; as deputy director of the agency, I was with President Obama when we killed Osama bin Laden in 2011.
I am neither a registered Democrat nor a registered Republican. In my 40 years of voting, I have pulled the lever for candidates of both parties. As a government official, I have always been silent about my preference for president.
No longer. On Nov. 8, I will vote for Hillary Clinton. Between now and then, I will do everything I can to ensure that she is elected as our 45th president.
Mr. Trump has no experience on national security. Even more important, the character traits he has exhibited during the primary season suggest he would be a poor, even dangerous, commander in chief.
These traits include his obvious need for self-aggrandizement, his overreaction to perceived slights, his tendency to make decisions based on intuition, his refusal to change his views based on new information, his routine carelessness with the facts, his unwillingness to listen to others and his lack of respect for the rule of law.
The dangers that flow from Mr. Trump’s character are not just risks that would emerge if he became president. It is already damaging our national security.
President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia was a career intelligence officer, trained to identify vulnerabilities in an individual and to exploit them. That is exactly what he did early in the primaries. Mr. Putin played upon Mr. Trump’s vulnerabilities by complimenting him. He responded just as Mr. Putin had calculated.
Mr. Putin is a great leader, Mr. Trump says, ignoring that he has killed and jailed journalists and political opponents, has invaded two of his neighbors and is driving his economy to ruin. Mr. Trump has also taken policy positions consistent with Russian, not American, interests — endorsing Russian espionage against the United States, supporting Russia’s annexation of Crimea and giving a green light to a possible Russian invasion of the Baltic States.
In the intelligence business, we would say that Mr. Putin had recruited Mr. Trump as an unwitting agent of the Russian Federation.
Thats what he's always been worried about. Hence the Pence pick. Ensure establishment, real social conservative to shore up turnout to the extent where he doesn't lose house and senate.paul ryan sending an urgent email saying they must not give clinton a blank check. i guess hes past worried of losing the presidential election and worried about losing the house and senate.