• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

Elections 2016 Presidential Election General Discussion v2

How satisfied are you voting for your candidate?


  • Total voters
    71
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
.

Not gonna lie, I can't even tell what the purpose of his visit to Mexico was. Billable hours for his plane? Free breakfast? Those reasons are actually very plausible. How many billionaires do you know that do informercials for steaks?

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-36215048

Donald Trump declares Hispanic love with tacos

_89607296_cincodemayo.jpg
 
What I stated above are facts,not assumptions. I am 100% correct now and will continue to be correct in November and beyond.
Another sherdogger that thinks their opinion qualifies as a fact...
 
...and it's not the presidency.

The evidence supports it.

Look at his recent campaign changes.

His train wreck of an immigration policy (rather how he came up with it the past few weeks).

He has a SINGLE field office in Florida.

www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/the-fix/wp/2016/09/01/donald-trump-has-1-field-office-open-in-all-of-florida-thats-a-total-disaster

He reneges on his intention to give speeches to black communities. Which many people know are critical for him to win the election.

http://www.freep.com/story/news/pol...up-but-not-speak-out-detroit-church/89583552/

Not gonna lie, I can't even tell what the purpose of his visit to Mexico was. Billable hours for his plane? Free breakfast? Those reasons are actually very plausible. How many billionaires do you know that do informercials for steaks?

This man will not win the election. Now matter how badly the many people that come up to me and say how much they love him wish for it. HE doesn't want to win. Never has.

But what he's done is set himself up for all kinds of future business endeavors that are MUCH easier than trying to peddle steaks.

What I stated above are facts,not assumptions. I am 100% correct now and will continue to be correct in November and beyond.

My question to you is this. Would you rather have had Romney or Kasich to vote for this November?



Trump odds of winning just went down to +280 and the polls are getting closer.
 
I'm torn. On one hand I'm glad Trump is the candidate because he is very beatable and Romney & Kasich have horrendous ideas. On the other hand, Trump might win and drive the human race to extinction.
 
So he doesn't want to win, but instead is trying to open up more business ventures after he purposely loses and this is his true motivation.

And this is 100% fact.

Dudes an old Billionaire. Seems like a lot of effort to just keep making more money he doesn't need.
 
I'm torn. On one hand I'm glad Trump is the candidate because he is very beatable and Romney & Kasich have horrendous ideas. On the other hand, Trump might win and drive the human race to extinction.


I thought only republicans fear monger?
 
That Trump taco picture makes me hungry every time
 
He's like a drunk uncle at Thanksgiving. The guy is all over the place. It's impossible to pinpoint what his true motives are.
 
So he doesn't want to win, but instead is trying to open up more business ventures after he purposely loses and this is his true motivation.

And this is 100% fact.

Dudes an old Billionaire. Seems like a lot of effort to just keep making more money he doesn't need.

Guy's got a string of business failures that go back decades, has resorted to flat out scamming people for money, and has credible reporters saying his value is anywhere from $250 million to $4 billion, nowhere near his self-proclaimed $10 billion. In this election he's directing more than 1/3 of his campaign finances back to his own companies while scrimping and saving on things like employees.

There's a lot of people talking about the likelihood of Trump attempting to launch a media empire after the election.
 
I don't need to google it, I grew up in the church (acolyte, lay reader, cross bearer and John the Baptist in the children's version of annual Nativity play). Women are to respect their husbands and husbands are to love their wives. Does that mean that husbands don't have to respect their wives? Wives don't have to love their husbands?

Silly word games. My question was very different: What are women's roles supposed to be, according to you and your interpretation of the Bible - simply to follow us, to take direction except in those circumstances where this no man to give it to them? That women aren't intrinsically capable of being leaders equal to men in achieving results?
I know too many people who "grew up in the Church"...if you're seriously asking whether Paul meant women are not to love their husbands, or husbands shouldn't respect their wives, then you "growing up in the Church" clearly didn't mean a damn thing.

If you're asking what women's roles are supposed to be, then you must ask yourself what men's roles should be...and it's imperative that you have a reliable source...therefore, dump whatever TMZ, Yahoo, or COSMOPOLITAN is telling us what the roles must be!

If you're asking me whether a woman can be a greater leader than a man, then my answer 9 times our of 10 times will be a resounding "no".
 
Guy's got a string of business failures that go back decades, has resorted to flat out scamming people for money, and has credible reporters saying his value is anywhere from $250 million to $4 billion, nowhere near his self-proclaimed $10 billion. In this election he's directing more than 1/3 of his campaign finances back to his own companies while scrimping and saving on things like employees.

There's a lot of people talking about the likelihood of Trump attempting to launch a media empire after the election.

So you think it's true then, that he's running for POTUS but doesn't want to win, but rather he wants to simply grow his business afterwards?

Anything is possible, but I doubt it is that simple.

I mean, win or lose he's a business man. So I have no doubt he would use the opportunity to do that if he loses (or wins for that matter), but saying this is his motivation the entire time is what I find unlikely.

It could be true that he is being setup to lose, regardless of him being aware of it though. These things work better I think when the person isn't aware of it, so can believe in what they are doing which makes for a better outward appearance. But, that would be a conspiracy..
 
Last edited:
I'm torn. On one hand I'm glad Trump is the candidate because he is very beatable and Romney & Kasich have horrendous ideas. On the other hand, Trump might win and drive the human race to extinction.

Just hold on to the fact that every single time we are voting in a president people on either side say this will be the end of America and things always end up being just fine. That's what's so great about this country it's going to take a lot more than just one man to bring it down.

I was there when people said Clinton would be the end of America - we were fine.

I was there when people said Bush would be the end of America - we were fine.

I was there when people said Obama would be the end of America - we were fine.
 
I'm hearing a lot of people, smart people, saying Trump doesn't even want to win. I'm not saying it I'm just telling you
what I heard other people say.

150811165239-trump-shrug-gif-custom-1.gif
 
I think I liked you better as Jesus Freak.
 
So you think it's true then, that he's running for POTUS but doesn't want to win, but rather he wants to simply grow his business afterwards?

Anything is possible, but I doubt it is that simple.

I mean, win or lose he's a business man. So I have no doubt he would use the opportunity to do that if he loses (or wins for that matter), but saying this is his motivation the entire time is what I find unlikely.

It could be true that he is being setup to lose, regardless of him being aware of it though. These things work better I think when the person isn't aware of it, so can believe in what they are doing which makes for a better outward appearance. But, that would be a conspiracy..

I don't know if he's throwing the election, but it would explain a lot. I do think he entered the primaries to boost interest in his brand, as many people do, and never expected to wind up as a the GOP nominee. Someone from early in his campaign said this is what happened and they would have happy just hitting double digit support.

I would not be surprised if someone soberly explained to him the consequences of a bad presidency and now he's just trying to undo the personal consequences he accrued. Foot traffic is down at Trump businesses 30% and he's had agreements broken by NBC and Unavision
 
Can we all agree Jill Stein is the only anti free trade, anti interventionist, anti big banks, candidate that will be on all 50 ballots? I loathe many of the green party platforms as I'm not a huge environmentalist but looking at those big ticket issues she seems to be most in agreement to my personal beliefs.
She won't be on all 50 ballots, so no, I cannot agree.

She does have the anti-cred you seek. She is also anti-vaccines, which is pretty much the climate change denial position of the left.
 

Not surprising really


"Jacob Monty, a member of Trump’s National Hispanic Advisory Council, quickly resigned after the speech. Another member, Ramiro Pena, a Texas pastor, said Trump's speech likely cost him the election and said he'd have to reconsider being part of a "scam." And Alfonso Aguilar, the president of the Latino Partnership for Conservative Principles, said in an interview that he is “inclined” to pull his support.

“I was a strong supporter of Donald Trump when I believed he was going to address the immigration problem realistically and compassionately,” said Monty, a Houston attorney who has aggressively made the Latino case for Trump. “What I heard today was not realistic and not compassionate.”



Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/...ders-arizona-immigration-227615#ixzz4J2PtCmMH
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook
 
I know too many people who "grew up in the Church"...if you're seriously asking whether Paul meant women are not to love their husbands, or husbands shouldn't respect their wives, then you "growing up in the Church" clearly didn't mean a damn thing.

If you're asking what women's roles are supposed to be, then you must ask yourself what men's roles should be...and it's imperative that you have a reliable source...therefore, dump whatever TMZ, Yahoo, or COSMOPOLITAN is telling us what the roles must be!

If you're asking me whether a woman can be a greater leader than a man, then my answer 9 times our of 10 times will be a resounding "no".
Tell us how you would be a better leader than Elizabeth I.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top