- Joined
- May 24, 2004
- Messages
- 32,999
- Reaction score
- 4,729
The guy was cornered for hours. He had stopped shooting hours before they blew him up. And the fact that they used a robot to do it suggests he wasn't actively involved in trying to kill people when it happened. I can't imagine them releasing this robot out in the middle of gunfire exchange.
If he had gotten killed in the initial firefight when he's a threat to bystanders and police then yeah, that probably can't be called an execution. But this wasn't that.
Again, I don't really think a live combatant can be 'executed' in the way you are suggesting. It's not much different than warfare. If an enemy soldier is still holding a gun in a situation of active hostility between the sides, they remain 100% legitimate targets. It's not an 'execution' unless the combatant is trying to surrender, has dropped their arms, or have been disarmed.
Just because you surround an enemy soldier doesn't make him your friend, or make it wrong to shoot the guy.
The guy was a live combatant, armed and dangerous, in a situation with multiple combatants. If you had walked up to him, he would've shot you in the face. The fact that he was cornered didn't make him a peaceful noncombatant. And I don't have feels for armed combatants being shot. He wanted to maintain armed hostilities, he got what he freely chose.