Crime 10 dead in Canada school shooting

Right wing logic on display in this thread: "People who belong to groups that are socially stigmatized are likely to become socially isolated and fall into extremist ideologies online. Therefore, we need to stigmatize those people further."

This is what some people actually believe. It is wrong, and must be rejected.

"Hey, we should all hang out with these freaks with a high percentage of chance to be violent against themselves & others."
 
I'm not upset, just calling a spade a spade, you're retarded and wrong.
No, you just can't handle being wrong about something online. Just like so many others on this board. I can't imagine what a mental weakling one must be in life if one can't handle being wrong while anonymous.

You guys always either stop responding or switch the conversation to something else, preferably with ad hominems. You're really predictable.
 
No, you just can't handle being wrong about something online. Just like so many others on this board. I can't imagine what a mental weakling one must be in life if one can't handle being wrong while anonymous.

You guys always either stop responding or switch the conversation to something else, preferably with ad hominems. You're really predictable.
Show proof I am wrong, all you said was something about English and pronouns . The burden is on you to show proof with whatever stupid point you're trying to make.
 
They should treat it like the mental illness it really is. These people have the delusion that their normal healthy body is somehow the wrong gender, trying to ram a square peg into a round hole by altering the body instead of treating the delusion makes no sense to me

It's a software problem being treated as a hardware problem. It's a mental virus. A strictly western mental virus that infects a certain sub-section of (mostly white) society.


"Hey, we should all hang out with these freaks with a high percentage of chance to be violent against themselves & others."


I don't want to be anywhere near these people.
 


The shooter had a lot of white supremacist activity online according to the ADL.

Of course, none of this is true, and the ADL has now altered their original article without apologizing for all the false information they reported.


Desperate to blame it on anything right wing instead of correctly blaming it on trannyism.
 
Show proof I am wrong, all you said was something about English and pronouns . The burden is on you to show proof with whatever stupid point you're trying to make.

In order to make it as clear as possible, so we won't end up in the usual obfuscation attempts, you can first show where I'm wrong as you said that before I did.

It may also let you sort your thoughts as right now you're both saying I'm wrong and that you don't understand.
 
In order to make it as clear as possible, so we won't end up in the usual obfuscation attempts, you can first show where I'm wrong as you said that before I did.

It may also let you sort your thoughts as right now you're both saying I'm wrong and that you don't understand.
You said native English speakers don’t know how to use pronouns correctly , replying to my post (I’m paraphrasing ). So what word did I use that is incorrect and not a pronoun , when referring to the shooter ?? You replied to me and others yet have not made any real tangible post .
 
You said native English speakers don’t know how to use pronouns correctly , replying to my post (I’m paraphrasing ). So what word did I use that is incorrect and not a pronoun , when referring to the shooter ?? You replied to me and others yet have not made any real tangible post .

No, I've said that several posters in the thread have complained about pronouns without knowing what they are, seeing how they aimed their criticism to something that wasn't one. Knowing what they are comes before using them. I haven't said anything about you using a pronoun to refer to the shooter.

But since you're now answering my question where I was wrong, I'd say that the only way your faulty paraphrasing is actually wrong is if you think I said that all English speakers don't know how to use pronouns correctly. Is that what you meant to say? Otherwise your reply isn't clear.
 
We went over this in the Minnesota thread, too.

No you didn't, Sadchick. You were humiliated in typical fashion.

White people keep shooting up kids at schools.

Cue the resident Karens to come in and screech about P-values, LMAO. "The sample size is too small! You can't establish a positive correlation!"

Clearly there is something going on, here.

There certainly is something going on.

laugh-lol.gif
 
No, you just can't handle being wrong about something online. Just like so many others on this board. I can't imagine what a mental weakling one must be in life if one can't handle being wrong while anonymous.

You guys always either stop responding or switch the conversation to something else, preferably with ad hominems. You're really predictable.

The hypocrisy in this post is at levels rarely seen before.
 
According to current reddit progressive fruitcake logic, the only reason someone does something bad is because they are themselves victims of an unfair and unjust society. The gunperson incidents will continue until Canadian society stops stigmatizing and bullying this visible minority.
WILD.
 
You said native English speakers don’t know how to use pronouns correctly , replying to my post (I’m paraphrasing ). So what word did I use that is incorrect and not a pronoun , when referring to the shooter ?? You replied to me and others yet have not made any real tangible post .
It's a big old waste of time arguing with the kind of sad midwit whose big contribution to a thread on a school shooting is to be a non native English speaker trying to coach up native English speakers on parts of speech because someone inferred the sheriff trying "respect she/her pronouns" by referring to the gunman as "gunperson".

"Well ackshually, gunperson isn't itself the pronoun". Like was that dork expecting anybody to say "Holy shit, foreigner, what an amazing contribution to the discussion"?



the-office-steve-carell.gif
 
Back
Top