D
Deleted member 457759
Guest
Because she's supposed to be one of the "good guys" lol.
Fuck I hate that cunt, I see right through her.
Fuck I hate that cunt, I see right through her.
So you're admitting Hillary and Bill are creeps?
I think these guys have to continue to attack Hillary so they don't have to face the reality of how corrupt and incompetent their hero Trump is.
Hillary holds exactly zero elected offices at this time, nor is she campaigning for one, so why should a private citizen be asked to "disavow" someone else?
Have you been asked to disavow Anthony Wiener?
Do you guys go outside and actually meet people once and a while?
Most people keep shit like that to themselves, especially if it is obviously creepy like what Weiner was up to. I don't make sure people are normal in the bedroom before I associate with them, do you?
Basically, if you are conservative and a conservative person says something the liberal media deems objectionable, they call you up and ask you to disavow it. If you refuse, they smear you on the news that night and people call up your employer trying to get you fired.
You mean his wife? GTFOAnthony's first scandal was years ago and Hillary was still palling around with the Weiners for years after. Then again, Bill's scandal was a decade plus ago and Hillary didn't divorce him because she thought it might hurt her career.
Fair point. But it's also a real issue that one question is asked despite being irrelevant while the other is not asked despite being relevant.Pretty sure Hillary would not hesitate to throw Weiner right under the bus if anyone cared about Hillary Clinton enough anymore to ask her.
I think the real issue with Trump and Duke is that when he was asked about it at first he hesitated to disavow Duke.
The Trump supporters in this thread must be mentally ill to spend so much time thinking about Hillary.
Fair point. But it's also a real issue that one question is asked despite being irrelevant while the other is not asked despite being relevant.
Jesus, you guys (GOP hacks) are so disingenuous. Weiner's loathsomeness is related to his personal characteristics. Duke's is related to his ideas. You don't share personal characteristics with loose allies, but you might well share ideas. I don't believe anyone is dumb enough to truly miss the difference.
I feel like they've invested more time into caring Hillary Clinton this past week than I have my entire life.
I wonder why?
Hillary Clinton is not relevant.
hillary claimed to be fighting for women, when her husband and associates are raping them
weiner clearly has very disgusting IDEAs about respecting women
Jesus, you guys (GOP hacks) are so disingenuous. Weiner's loathsomeness is related to his personal characteristics. Duke's is related to his ideas. You don't share personal characteristics with loose allies, but you might well share ideas. I don't believe anyone is dumb enough to truly miss the difference.
Fair point. But it's also a real issue that one question is asked despite being irrelevant while the other is not asked despite being relevant.