Chael's MMA wrestling has never been very good.
His regular wrestling is great and anyone vulnerable to high level regular wrestling in MMA (and there are a lot) will be vulnerable to Chael. However anyone not vulnerable to regular wrestling (have great subs, etc) is not vulnerable to Chael or any regular wrestler fighter. Think of the early UFC days when guys with just BJJ could dominate even if they did not adapt their BJJ to MMA. Guys just could not defend even pure BJJ.
Chael is lucky that he fought in a generally weak MW division during his prime as I cannot think of any other top wrestling based fighter in any other division who did not adapt their wrestling well to MMA (great sub defense, etc) in order to be competitive in their division.
Mma is crazy. This is really a thread.
Overall, Fedor has had better mma grappling than Sonnen and it’s not close. Sonnen can’t defend a triangle to save his life.
9 sub losses in his career, 4 by triangle.You must be stuck in 2005, to say Chael didnt adapt his wrestling to MMA is absurd. The guy may be a cunt or a clown in the mic, but behind that, there is a hell of a hard-working guy from a top gym, concretely in the wrestling dept, which resulted on him massively evolving his all around mma grappling throught the years.
So Yushin Okami, a guy who stopped 18 takedowns from Mark Munoz in one night, stuffed Marquardt, Lombard or Jake Shields back in the day, has still one of the highest TDD % in ufc...is weak. So are Marquard or Rua?
Is Michael Bisping a guy with weak defensive wrestling, really?
Isnt Anderson well versed in submissions? The guy need 24 minuts of fighting to get a submission in their firt fight. In the first round of their second fight, Chael took him down at will and ended the round on full mount. Something the Chael from 2005 couldnt have done.
He has also done well in grappling matches lately...the guys evolved on a really all-around solid grappler. To deny this is pretty stupid..
Obviously beating an all time great heavyweight in Fedor is another thing.
Sonnen has only got caught in a triangle by Maia and the then #1p4p and still GOAT to many Anderson Silva. No other caught him in a triangle in the last 13 years. But whatever
9 sub losses in his career, 4 by triangle.
Fedor has been subbed only by Werdum and dominated the guard of Nog when that meant something. I guess Sonnen’s 9 sub losses to Fedor’s 1 is indicative of Sonnen’s superior grappling. But whatever.
That’s not the question. The thread asks who has better mma grappling. Sonnen literally lost by sub last year in January. He has a long history of terrible sub defense. This is not about losses he just had in 2004-2005. This is the story of his career. Out of 15 losses, 9 came by way of submission. Sonnen’s biggest weakest in a fight is his defense on the ground. That’s not something you’d want on your resume when debating on who has better grappling.Im not even saying Sonnen is a better grappler.
Just saying that talking about sub losses that Sonnen suffered back in 2004 or 2005 doenst mean shit. If you dont see that he has evolved his grappling so much in the last 15 years it your problem
Chael did not adapt his wrestling to MMA like others did in other divisions to be competitive. He was still as vulnerable to a triangle choke or other submissions as many of the wrestlers in the infancy of this sport. He was visibly terrified when faced with a good submission artist and ready to tap out almost instantly.You must be stuck in 2005, to say Chael didnt adapt his wrestling to MMA is absurd. The guy may be a cunt or a clown in the mic, but behind that, there is a hell of a hard-working guy from a top gym, concretely in the wrestling dept, which resulted on him massively evolving his all around mma grappling throught the years.
So Yushin Okami, a guy who stopped 18 takedowns from Mark Munoz in one night, stuffed Marquardt, Lombard or Jake Shields back in the day, has still one of the highest TDD % in ufc...is weak. So are Marquard or Rua?
Is Michael Bisping a guy with weak defensive wrestling, really?
Isnt Anderson well versed in submissions? The guy need 24 minuts of fighting to get a submission in their firt fight. In the first round of their second fight, Chael took him down at will and ended the round on full mount. Something the Chael from 2005 couldnt have done.
He has also done well in grappling matches lately...the guys evolved on a really all-around solid grappler. To deny this is pretty stupid..
Obviously beating an all time great heavyweight in Fedor is another thing.
...
That’s not the question. The thread asks who has better mma grappling. Sonnen literally lost by sub last year in January. He has a long history of terrible sub defense. This is not about losses he just had in 2004-2005. This is the story of his career. Out of 15 losses, 9 came by way of submission. Sonnen’s biggest weakest in a fight is his defense on the ground. That’s not something you’d want on your resume when debating on who has better grappling.
Chael was a great wrestler and even today a high level wrestler with no other MMA training can have success if he is matched up with guys who have poor tdd and no sub threat. They jsut cannot get the wrestler out of top control and they lose the decision.
Less than Mir had, I would say Mir had 45% of chances and Chael has 20% to beat fedor on Oct 13. MMA's world will be very happy when the goat wins the tournamentFedor in his prime definitely, but I think Chael has a good shot to beat him.
Tito ran through sonnen,wandy caught him with his grandpa speed loopy shots........
Fedor by GOD'S WILL!!!!
Tito ego is so big he wouldn't fix a fightI think Fedor will win but anyone with half a brain knows that Sonnen-Ortiz fight was fixed.