- Joined
- Sep 6, 2018
- Messages
- 592
- Reaction score
- 2
I've never heard of that before?
Apparently it's a split draw.
Not sure why they called it a split decision draw.
Ok...I've always known that to be called a split draw. Not that it mattersIf 1 judge scores for a, a second scores for b, and the third scores it a draw, it's a split decision draw.
If two judges scored the fight for fighter a and the third scored for fighter b, that'd be a split decision.
If two judges scored the fight for fighter a, and the third scored the fight a draw, it'd be a majority decision.
If two judges scored the fight for a draw, and the third scored it for fighter a, it'd be a majority draw.
If 1 judge scores for a, a second scores for b, and the third scores it a draw, it's a split decision draw.
I was confused when they didn't announce it as a split draw but it sounds like they reached that result.
they said "split decision draw" though not "split draw" which is what we are discussingUhh... Golovkin/canelo 1 was a split draw. Have you never watched a fight in your life?
It is when we all bet a lot money on winner Wilder or Tyson and we all lose and they all take our moneyI've never heard of that before?
It is when we all bet a lot money on winner Wilder or Tyson and we all lose and they all take our money