- Joined
- Aug 18, 2009
- Messages
- 47,466
- Reaction score
- 20,914
Now you're modifying your argument to avoid the implications of my question.My main point is that it is reasonable to refer to a male as a man, regardless of whether he considers himself a woman and attempts to comport himself as a woman. Beyond that, yes I think the federal government should not be involved in how we address one another at all.
I asked if you would defend that landlord's ability to refer to a guy as "she" if that's what the landlord felt was appropriate. You said that you would.
The point of my question was very straightforward - who gets final say in how the landlord refers to the tenant? Does the landlord decide or the tenant?
That's my question - who decides. You said the landlord. Are you standing by that answer or not?