University of Alaska study on WTC Building 7 concludes it could not have come down due to fires

Copied your quote to find the original source:
https://www.activistpost.com/2016/0...show-fire-could-not-have-caused-collapse.html
"Activist Post: Propaganda for Peace, Prosperity, and Love". After all, this study literally partnered with a Truther organization. Meanwhile, what knowledge does the lead professor promise he can bequeath? Nothing. He admits his data sat is pitiful, and yet he seeks to offer nothing more than to poke holes in a much more robust narrative from that paucity of knowledge.

What could you possibly expect to learn from the same bullshit rehashed for the 10 millionth time? We are way past due for all the Truthers out there to finally come to terms with and accept that they were wrong, and have continued to be wrong about this now for over 15 years.
 
Not sure teaming with two truther organizations to do it is the best way to avoid confirmation bias in a study.

Kinda sounds something like "Berkeley professor teams with 'People For Trump is a sexist Russian spy' to investigate claims Trump is a Sexist Russian spy, research funded by the Truth About Trump Being A Sexist Russian Spy organization and Louise Mench" as a starting point.

Says they'll publish their work for review so guess we'll have to wait till next year to see what it looks like.
 
Madmick said:
Copied your quote to find the original source:
https://www.activistpost.com/2016/0...show-fire-could-not-have-caused-collapse.html
"Activist Post: Propaganda for Peace, Prosperity, and Love". After all, this study literally partnered with a Truther organization. Meanwhile, what knowledge does the lead professor promise he can bequeath? Nothing. He admits his data sat is pitiful, and yet he seeks to offer nothing more than to poke holes in a much more robust narrative from that paucity of knowledge.

What could you possibly expect to learn from the same bullshit rehashed for the 10 millionth time? We are way past due for all the Truthers out there to finally come to terms with and accept that they were wrong, and have continued to be wrong about this now for over 15 years.
Click to expand...

So is there nothing about the official narrative that you question?
 
Obligatory
Everyone knows your mom sat on it
 
Madmick said:
After all, this study literally partnered with a Truther organization.
Click to expand...

Bloody Pulp said:
Not sure teaming with two truther organizations to do it is the best way to avoid confirmation bias in a study.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I noticed that too. It does seem like an odd decision.

Though it's probably worth mentioning the members of A&E for 9/11 Truth became as much because they first felt like the facts weren't adding up. They didn't decide the facts didn't add up because they were first members of a Truther organization.
 
This is such a joke. I live in Alaska and have bin to Fairbanks many times, lots of conspiracy nut jobs.

http://quatloos.com/Q-Forum/viewtopic.php?f=49&t=8395&start=120

"I remember the months before he was apprehended. This guy was a star in the whole "truther/birther/conspiracy" nutjob wing of Americana. There were people who viewed his "speeches" and supported him as someone worth following. His video of his crazed courtroom speeches- which I understand helped get him convicted - got lots of views."
Top
 
Im not a conspiracy theory type but it still doesnt make sense the way that tower fell in its own footprint
 
mb23100 said:
Im not a conspiracy theory type but it still doesnt make sense the way that tower fell in its own footprint
Click to expand...

Yeah, what's weird is not just that the building came down, but HOW it came down.
 
shadow_priest_x said:
In 2015 a team at the University of Alaska launched a research project to determine the cause of the collapse of WTC Building 7 on 9/11.

Project promo:



In 2016 they announced their preliminary findings:



Three days ago the professor in charge of the project gave a presentation at the University:

https://media.uaf.edu/media/t/0_rxmrybkv

The full and final report is expected in 2018.

Discuss.
Click to expand...


You're an idiot
 
Madmick said:
Copied your quote to find the original source:
https://www.activistpost.com/2016/0...show-fire-could-not-have-caused-collapse.html
"Activist Post: Propaganda for Peace, Prosperity, and Love". After all, this study literally partnered with a Truther organization. Meanwhile, what knowledge does the lead professor promise he can bequeath? Nothing. He admits his data sat is pitiful, and yet he seeks to offer nothing more than to poke holes in a much more robust narrative from that paucity of knowledge.

What could you possibly expect to learn from the same bullshit rehashed for the 10 millionth time? We are way past due for all the Truthers out there to finally come to terms with and accept that they were wrong, and have continued to be wrong about this now for over 15 years.
Click to expand...

He's just going to put you on ignore when you hurt his feelings.
 
wtc7naudetxf5.gif


It looks exactly like controlled demolition.
 
mb23100 said:
Im not a conspiracy theory type but it still doesnt make sense the way that tower fell in its own footprint
Click to expand...

It's quite plausible . What isn't plausible however is that the whole building was rigged . It's crazy on so many levels. For one why even plan on blowing it up when a plane full of jet fuel is going to crash into it? Dang!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

LeonardoBjj
Social Groundwater depletion accelerating in many parts of the world, study finds
Replies
5
Views
379
Otto!
Otto!

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,237,032
Messages
55,462,784
Members
174,786
Latest member
JoyceOuthw

Share this page

Back
Top