Economy UN demands Americans to eat less meat

F1980

Purple Belt
@purple
Joined
Nov 2, 2018
Messages
1,684
Reaction score
1,656
Basically, rich countries, ESPECIALLY the US is consuming too much meat which is crucial to the fight against climate change. Recently, a speech was made in the melting ice of Antarctica in view of the UN leaders to show how dire the situation is in saving the planet.



ROME (TND) — Americans will soon be advised to eat less meat in an initiative by the United Nations to meet the constraints of the Paris Climate Accords, Bloomberg reported.

The United Nations’ Food & Agriculture Organization (FAO) is expected to announce the guidance at the COP28 summit in December. Richer nations such as the U.S. and Australia will be asked to curb their “overconsumption” of meat.
 
COP28 will be held in the United Arab Emirates, it's mostly a climate change conference, and the host has planned a lot of oil and gas deals to take place in the sidelines.

tells you all you need to know about this.
it's an important event that gathers most of the world leaders who will agree on a final statement that solves nothing.
 
They want us to eat insects!!!11!!1!

George Washington would roll in his grave if he knew what they are asking us to do.
 
U.N is bunch of powerless and useless parasites, their sanctions are laughable idiotism and will not prevent us to develop and test missiles. These old parasites are just well paid useless parasites in armchairs ,👹, these idiots will not be capable to prevent us to develop and test missiles.
Trademark: North Korea...2000 th.

Appears that it was true statement.
 
These assholes are not serious about Climate Change. If they were, they embrace Modern Nuclear Power and they shit on it. This is a money grab by a bunch of frauds. They at least acknowledged that all their projections were off dramatically. They concluded in 2015 that we were facing a global average temperature increase of 3.5 degrees Celsius compared to pre-industrial era levels. That figure is now “completely off the table,” according to their experts. The revised figure is 2.7 degrees. We don't all die in a decade. Good news!
 
how will they enforce this? by doing what they've already done and alluded to...sabotaging supply chains, farming, and introducing digital ID that goes hand in hand with digital currency that form social credit. i'm sorry dave, you've bought your yearly alotment of meat. your only available options are cricket paste and bill gates' lab grown meat. ditto for driving. welcome to your new sustainable and inclusive planet!

leftists still call this a conspiracy theory.
 
These assholes are not serious about Climate Change. If they were, they embrace Modern Nuclear Power and they shit on it. This is a money grab by a bunch of frauds. They at least acknowledged that all their projections were off dramatically. They concluded in 2015 that we were facing a global average temperature increase of 3.5 degrees Celsius compared to pre-industrial era levels. That figure is now “completely off the table,” according to their experts. The revised figure is 2.7 degrees. We don't all die in a decade. Good news!

You have a link to any of these claims?

And how's 'modern nuclear power' doing these days? Any relevant recent news in the SMR world? Perhaps something that might confirm what myself and several others have posted on the subject previously, which is that it's far too expensive to be a real solution?
 
They want us to eat insects!!!11!!1!

George Washington would roll in his grave if he knew what they are asking us to do.
People in Washington era weren’t fat beer drinking fried chicken donut fucks.
 
I suspect that the next president might pull some stunt like withdrawing all US funding for the UN and using it to buy steaks for every house in America or something... And it'll have majority approval.
 
Probably should edit that to propose just eating less, in general, when your average is walking around(metaphorically; people don't actually walk these days) with a BMI in the 30's.
 
You have a link to any of these claims?

And how's 'modern nuclear power' doing these days? Any relevant recent news in the SMR world? Perhaps something that might confirm what myself and several others have posted on the subject previously, which is that it's far too expensive to be a real solution?

There is so much bad information on the cost of Modern Nuclear. Here's an older video. Cliff Notes: After Year 19 a nuclear plant is vastly cheaper than a Natural Gas plant. As you get into years 25+ the numbers overwhelming favor nuclear. Finally, Nuclear plants are designed to work for 40 years... or more.



With the invent of the Westinghouse AP1000, we can make nuclear so much less expensive than even that video shares. That's a large reactor, that uses far less fuel, is ridiculously safe, and the waste is minimal as well. On the SMR front, bad news, the numbers did not add up recently with the newer versions. As China took off the AP1000 design and is now mass producing it on their own, they are building them fast. They will benefit as we far further and further behind on energy with our current policy.

We can solve our energy issues with nuclear and produce no carbon emissions, but that is not the direction telling me these Global Warming Alarmists are not serious.
 
Back
Top