Also, if you look closely, you can track the shape of the gun down through that lady's chin and it is obviously not pointing up at anyone. I didn't realize that until I took a closer look myself but the whole thing is even more retarded than initially thought. And to be fair, if I was standing in the road and someone drove a car into a crowd, my gun would probably not be pointing down, that's for sure.
The jury after seeing all the evidence and hearing both sides decided he was guilty of murder. Guess the first DA was wrong.
There’s plenty other people in front of the car he’d already run into.
I don’t like attempts at precise angles of gun barrels. In the moment people won’t see that tiny difference.
But what if the person is a "BLM activist" and it's really really important that the liberals get taught a lesson?
Oh sure, I just think it's further evidence that the entire thing is retarded
Self defense? He and the rest can just walk away.
owned
You can walk faster than a car? Damn
The board of Pardon appointed and directed by the governor? Part of the pardon is that it is an admission of guilt. So they pardoned someone that is admitting to be guilty of murder? That's your case? Interesting.
Nobody was hit and the car wasn't moving. You're gonna have to come up with a better excuse to pull a gun on an uber driver. If you want to swarm strangers' cars and attack them with rifles, do it in a blue state where people aren't allowed to defend themselves.
Yes, anyone can move faster than a car that isn't moving. The DA would have definitely charged him with running people over if that is what was happening.
Car intentionally drive into a crowd. Raising a gun, but not firing, so that the driver could be taken out quickly if he floored it is a proper course of action. We’re all familiar with how devastating vehicle attacks can be.
That very sentiment is as American as apple pie, my friend. We have always compartmentalized violence into an acceptable hierarchy. It used to be literally codified legally along racial lines (for example), but the shift from de jure to de facto moved us basically into the realm of cognizant trolling
And if someone raises a gun at you while a mob is trying to detain you, shooting them to end the threat is the proper course of action. Sorry your buddy thought waving a rifle around and tough talking made him invincible, but he found out the hard way that not everybody they try to swarm is a "pussy who won't do shit".
