Asafa looked like a damn superhero during his 9.72. I love that one.incredible
Man I just love the event.Asafa looked like a damn superhero during his 9.72. I love that one.
Man I just love the event.
Why do you like him? His style of running?
I thought he looked a little tight in the chest/shoulders on his 9.72? To improve him is he a little bound up senri? Compared to bolt who is so fluid and elastic? Bolt just looks mobile in every joint which I would guess helps make him fast.Asafa has the most elegant running mechanics besides Carl Lewis, However Asafa is more the aesthetic athlete which compounds to the grace of how he runs. However he does not have the spirit of a champion.
Yes. The high knees etc. Makes it look like he's floating or something.Man I just love the event.
Why do you like him? His style of running?
Are we going to see sprinters getting taller and taller? Usain Bolt is 6'5", Asafa Powell is 6'3". Julio Jones is 6'3"
He's a powerful dude.Yes. The high knees etc. Makes it look like he's floating or something.
Are we going to see sprinters getting taller and taller? Usain Bolt is 6'5", Asafa Powell is 6'3". Julio Jones is 6'3"
Bolt is just FLUID. It's easy. Stride is incredible. Runs with a lot of elastic spring. Very springy.
I'm no coach, but that's what I see.
I thought he looked a little TIGHT in the chest/shoulders on his 9.72? To improve him is he a little bound up senri? Compared to bolt who is so fluid and elastic? Bolt just looks mobile in every joint which I would guess helps make him fast.
No, there's a trade-off tension just as in American Ninja Warrior, for example. It should go up, but it will never favor the more extreme end of the bell curve for greater height.
While it's advantageous for athletes to be shorter, because it means they weigh less, allowing for greater relative strength, there is simultaneously an advantage to being taller and have longer limbs (which also create more weight) because they allow for leverage and aid in some of the challenges which certainly favor absolute height (ex. the finishing wall, swinging obstacles, climbs involving pushing the legs against two opposing walls, etc.).
This is why among crossover athletes rock climbers tend to do the best of all, for example, and not elite male gymnasts.
In sprinting, greater height means a longer stride, but it also means a slower start (slower turnover = less foot contacts for propulsion). You are also, again, fighting gravity. Taller = heavier.
It's correct. Simplified, but uncontroversial.more or less correct.
It's correct. Simplified, but uncontroversial.
No, there's a trade-off tension just as in American Ninja Warrior, for example. It should go up, but it will never favor the more extreme end of the bell curve for greater height.
While it's advantageous for athletes to be shorter, because it means they weigh less, allowing for greater relative strength, there is simultaneously an advantage to being taller and have longer limbs (which also create more weight) because they allow for leverage and aid in some of the challenges which certainly favor absolute height (ex. the finishing wall, swinging obstacles, climbs involving pushing the legs against two opposing walls, etc.).
This is why among crossover athletes rock climbers tend to do the best of all, for example, and not elite male gymnasts.
In sprinting, greater height means a longer stride, but it also means a slower start (slower turnover = less foot contacts for propulsion). You are also, again, fighting gravity. Taller = heavier.