Nah, she was just going to die if they operated.
I thought the doctors said Ellie was going to die from the thing in her brain?
Nope don't remember anything like that. Just that she wouldn't survive the operation of extracting the thing in her brain which would lead to a cure. Her body had already adapted to having the infection.
Yea looks like I was wrong about that. Which is good makes there ability to continue the story much more open.
You never know though, they might choose to not even make it about Joel and Ellie. In a world like that there is countless story potential for different characters to be going through their own struggles. I think what would also be cool is if you play as completely different characters, but at some point you cross paths with Joel and Ellie, after the events of the first game.
Huh? It didn't end on an ambiguous note. Nothing about the resolution of their narrative (or what was imminent) was ambiguous.Given the huge success of the first game, this isn't surprising.
Only question is if it'll continue the story of Joel and Ellie. It ended on a perfect note, being ambiguous, I'm actually hoping they don't.
I am really apprehensive about this. Stories like that of Joel and Ellie's don't lend themselves to sequels. It was a story perfectly told with a definite beginning, and a definite end.
We need to get over this sequel fetish we have adopted culturally the past several decades.
Huh? It didn't end on an ambiguous note. Nothing about the resolution of their narrative (or what was imminent) was ambiguous.
The ambiguity was of an introspective or philosophical nature.
She knew he was lying and went along with it.
I thought they did a great job conveying that.
Whether or not Ellie knows if Joel is lying isn't what is important about that ending. You know that he is lying. That's what is important, and that's why there isn't any ambiguity.
Joel ended our species.
The philosophical ambiguity is this: was Joel an evil man, or not?
Whether or not Ellie knows if Joel is lying isn't what is important about that ending. You know that he is lying. That's what is important, and that's why there isn't any ambiguity. Joel ended our species.
The philosophical ambiguity is this: was Joel an evil man, or not?
The ambiguity is what Ellie would do afterward. Would she attempt to make contact with the fireflies to complete the surgery? Stay there at Joel's brother's outpost and life a long and healthy life?
There was ALOT of discussion about this when the game was released, and then rereleased on the PS4.
In-short, it all depends if you believe Marlene's story that the surgery and Ellie's sacrifice is guaranteed to be used to make a cure. If you take this at face value, then yes, Joel's actions severely marginalize the human's future population expansion on the planet. I doubt eventual extinction is likely, because the events of Last Of Us take place 20 years after the initial outbreak, and there's still survivors and children are still being born.
However, I think Marlene was bullshitting Joel, telling him what he wanted to hear, or what she has to tell herself, to justify ending the life of a little girl for the chance of a cure. A chance.
Just look at the hospital that the last level of the game takes place. There's doctors, not any scientists, or a lab, or the means to transport the extracted and valuable tissue from Ellie to a lab. Even then, there's no documented cure for the insect strand of Cordyceps (the real-life version of the infection in The Last of Us).
And keep in mind, in reality, hundreds of millions of dollars are dedicated to cancer research for a cure, and many other diseases and sicknesses with no previous cures. Some treatments have been discovered, and very few cures.
But this is a videogame, not reality. So, it all depends if you believe Marlene's words. I, personally, don't believe her, and even if she believes it, I don't believe they have the means to synthesize a likely cure. There's merely a chance.