I don't get your Point at all, its like you are living in a totally different Culture than i am ( i know you don't. You are finne i am svenne) .
You probably don't get my point because you live in a culture. I've quit living in a culture.
You can pursue relationships with people you work with, you never fucked a co-worker? well i have. There is a way to pursue people you like even if you work with them, the way is not to grab them by their pussy and promise a raise if they blow you...... There are tells if someone likes you or not.
You're assuming because you have done it yesterday, that you can do it tomorrow. That might be a pretty big false conclusion to come to.
Harvey Weinstein also thought that grabbing women by the boobs was acceptable for a long time. Then it ended up that it wasn't, and now he's fucked. In that case he ought to be fucked. But in your case, you shouldn't be fucked.
I'm here to push the tide back, to the extent that people like you, aren't going to be fucked, just for screwing around in the work place.
The nature of social movements is such, that if they are allowed to go forward without being critically evaluated, without a pushback of any kind, they tend to stretch themselves to the extreme end.
That's why men such as myself are required to put "checks" on how far such movements can extend to.
Let me ask you. How do you pursue a partner if you only work with men or alone at home? There are places that you can go to to meet women you know?
How do you pursue partners if a society is segregated by genders? That is easy, the society simply regulates partnerships, through forced marriages, families making marriage pacts etc.
When a society is not segregated by genders, which we've come to see as the norm, any time taken away from the men and women to pursue possible relationships, is time lost to further one's genetic potential. If we ban workplaces as acceptable environments to form partnerships, then it inevitably means that nearly 1/3rd of a man's or woman's regular day, is restricted from such pursuits.
That's going to lead to a lot of men and women losing out on potential relationships, even if they can still pursue them outside of that environment.
In current light, as a culture lacking fertility as it is, I'm not sure that is really a good way to resolve the problem.
To ask men or women not to sexually harass co-workers at work is not a restriction of sexual Liberty.
It is. Sexual harassment, unfortunately, is a consequence of sexual liberty, and a sexualized environment. We cannot stamp out harassment without restricting sexual liberty and protesting overtly sexualization of culture. The worst thing we can do, is to act as if restrictions somehow enhance liberty. We must be more honest than that. Something the ideological left, in particular, has a lot of problems with. Bans on speech, behaviour, etc. are being hailed as "liberal policies", which they are not.
We just need to come to acknowledge that sometimes restrictions and a lack of liberty, are necessary, for people to be able to co-exist peacefully. The restrictions are applied because the people have proven themselves incapable of acting properly in a liberated state.
We only need laws because people have a tendency to break laws. If people were able to operate morally and harmoniously without laws, we wouldn't need them.
To say that women with make up is "asking for it" is something i thought we have moved on from in western society.
It's not that they are "asking for it". But women wearing make up, is done for the purpose of enhancing their sexual appeal. That is known.
But the work environment is not a place where sexual relations are to be furthered, as we've come to generally acknowledge. Why is it that the man's advances are put in a negative light, but not that of the women's? Shouldn't there be some sort of an "equal" critical evaluation of whether women are sexualizing the work place themselves? Why is it only the man that are expected to be held up to "chivalrous" standards of conduct, while women can continue to behave lewdly?
All of that will inevitably lead to an outcry on the part of the "wronged" males. Don't expect men to give up something without taking something away from the women, in turn.