I could probably revise "damn good" to good. I haven't seen enough of his work to really make too much of a judgment on it. That said, I thought he did very well in two films that I saw within the past year and a half or so. The first, Barbarian, a well-received horror film that I did not particularly like. He's in only a relatively short portion of the film, but I thought that section was the best and that the dynamic between him and the film's lead actress, Georgina Campbell, was the highlight of that segment. He did a solid job of playing his character, a musician who winds up at a double-booked Air B&B with Campbell, with an affability but a subtle air of menace that added to the ambiguity of that plot set up. Speaking of Wick, again, I thought he was easily one of the more memorable heels from that franchise. He played a condescending, narcissistic villain quite effectively.
Yeah, I didn't think it looked that bad but I do get the complaints. I think there are usually two sets of negative opinions when any relatively lackluster or outright bad trailer for a film that is based on the same source material as a much-loved movie comes out. There are those who are annoyed that the reboot/remake/relaunch exists at all. And there are those who would welcome the existence if it were good but are annoyed because it's not. I tend to think that remakes of good movies (and again because this is just another attempt at adapting source material that inspired the original movie and not remake per se, it's a bit different) are really unnecessary. But I also don't feel that a bad remake is going to somehow taint the original. Brandon Lee Crow is awesome and will continue to be awesome, regardless of the quality of this film.