- Joined
- Jul 7, 2017
- Messages
- 4,371
- Reaction score
- 70
lol you have no idea.That's gotta be rough.
lol you have no idea.That's gotta be rough.
Who was he NOT able to defend against? Conor, and someone conor beat.Aldo defended against Full Camp Chad twice, and Frankie Edgar.
Keep up.
1. 7-7. I repeat, 7-7.
2. OK.
3. Shitty record.
4. I already said Poirier is a decent fighter.
5. GERMAN MIDGET ON STEROIDS. WHEN YOU DEGRADE YOUR OPPONENTS, YOU BASICALLY DEGRADE YOURSELF BECAUSE YOU FOUGHT LOUSY OPPONENTS, NOT GOOD ONES.
Also shitty record.
6. He had no camp. I already said Mendes was a decent fighter.
7. OK.
No Faber?
Conor is still too high imo. You can't be one of the goats until you attempt to defend a title.No.
Aldo
FABER
Conor
Edgar
Hioki
That's the correct list for those who actually checks ALL TIME before writing.
Who was he NOT able to defend against? Conor, and someone conor beat.
Lol. You think facing 25yo, 20-fight Max coming in off a 10-fight win streak is the same as facing 21yo, 9-fight Max coming in off a loss?
How adorable.
Yes yes max wasnt good until he lost to conor he was a total can before that.
Holloway is good. He always was good. He's improved yes, but the same could be said about conor.
This. I'd favor Conor over any FW, but he's not close to being FW GOAT."Best" and "Goat" are 2 different things.
Connor definitely doesn't have the resume to be FW Goat. And he left the division before verifying he could beat Frankie.
Not all sports get better. That's a myth.That's not how top 5 works dumb dumb. Rocky Marciano and Muhammad Ali are on everyone's top 10 all time Heavyweight lists even though they'd lose if they fought a lot of guys throughout boxings history. It's respective to fighters greatness in their relative era.
You clearly stated of all time.He'd lose to any of these guys. He's a pioneer but not top 5.