Social Teen Vogue teaches how to do anal sex the RIGHT way

[Cake4Breakfast]

Also it's amusing that the fool who's primary communication is memes wants to criticize someone else <45><45><45><45>

Did that make sense in your head?

Now get back to explaining how your survey is "scientific" and mine is "nonsense."

 

[m52nickerson]

Right, the fool who doesn't understand that sodomites can't make babies claims I don't understand biology <45>

It is very clear you don't. If you did you would not being making claims regarding intent. You would also understand the way natural selection works and how "making babies" is not the end all be all. You continue embarrassing yourself with your very simplistic argument.

 

[Devout Pessimist]

It is very clear you don't. If you did you would not being making claims regarding intent. You would also understand the way natural selection works and how "making babies" is not the end all be all. You continue embarrassing yourself with your very simplistic argument.

It must just burn your ass and the asses of your fellow progressives that even with the relentless education and social engineering, homoism is not becoming the norm. In fact, there has been a growing hostility towards homoism recently because people are tired of having the ideology of homoism aggressively forced on them. I guess like most braindead progressives, you think more education and social engineering will change peoples minds about homoism.

 

[m52nickerson]

It must just burn your ass and the asses of your fellow progressives that even with the relentless education and social engineering, homoism is not becoming the norm. In fact, there has been a growing hostility towards homoism recently because people are tired of having the ideology of homoism aggressively forced on them. I guess like most braindead progressives, you think more education and social engineering will change peoples minds about homoism.

I think I'm more educated because I am. I have the degree to prove it. I like your little rant here. It is a sign that you can't add to the "intent" argument that is going on, but you are upset your side is losing and feel the need to add something. So you post this little rant which has zero to do with the argument, but you can feel like you fought the good fight.

 

[Devout Pessimist]

I think I'm more educated because I am. I have the degree to prove it. I like your little rant here. It is a sign that you can't add to the "intent" argument that is going on, but you are upset your side is losing and feel the need to add something. So you post this little rant which has zero to do with the argument, but you can feel like you fought the good fight.

I wasn't talking about your education or how educated you think you are compared to others. Any idiot, including myself, can get a degree or two. I was referring to the fact that progressives have a laughable belief that "more education" can change human nature. People are not going to accept homosexuality as normal no matter how much education and social engineering you force on them. People will tolerate it within reason and many will virtue signal about how much they love gays, but a growing number of people are refusing to tolerate the LGBT+ movement the more it tries to push boundaries that should not be crossed. The growing number of people becoming less tolerant of the movement will not have their minds changed through education, social engineering and virtue signalling. There are limits to what most people will accept.

 

[m52nickerson]

I wasn't talking about your education or how educated you think you are compared to others. Any idiot, including myself, can get a degree or two. I was referring to the fact that progressives have a laughable belief that "more education" can change human nature. People are not going to accept homosexuality as normal no matter how much education and social engineering you force on them. People will tolerate it within reason and many will virtue signal about how much they love gays, but a growing number of people are refusing to tolerate the LGBT+ movement the more it tries to push boundaries that should not be crossed. The growing number of people becoming less tolerant of the movement will not have their minds changed through education, social engineering and virtue signalling. There are limits to what most people will accept.

If you had not noticed acceptance for homosexuality has been increasing, and continues to do so. You mistake the increasing loud outcries of some for an increase in numbers. That is not the case.

http://www.pewforum.org/fact-sheet/changing-attitudes-on-gay-marriage/

http://www.norc.org/NewsEventsPubli...n-acceptance-of-homosexuality-gss-report.aspx

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tan...sex-marriage-and-acceptance-of-homosexuality/

 

[Cake4Breakfast]

It must just burn your ass and the asses of your fellow progressives that even with the relentless education and social engineering, homoism is not becoming the norm. In fact, there has been a growing hostility towards homoism recently because people are tired of having the ideology of homoism aggressively forced on them. I guess like most braindead progressives, you think more education and social engineering will change peoples minds about homoism.

No way. There are always going to be religious people who have issues with homosexuals (usually not hot lesbians though, conservative guys love hot lesbian porn after all), and guys who were molested by pedophiles as children are going to hold that trauma against gay guys who are interested in grown men. Generally though, the attitude toward homosexuals is light years ahead of when I went to high school in the 80's and 90's, where nobody would dare admit that they were gay. Now you have kids being openly gay and dating in high school. And you never used to encounter openly flaming gay dudes working in square places of business like Marriott hotels, like you do all over the country now. The world has changed, especially with people under 30, where most people (who don't look at the world through bronze age colored glasses) see being gay as a non-issue.

 

[Cake4Breakfast]

If you had not noticed acceptance for homosexuality has been increasing, and continues to do so. You mistake the increasing loud outcries of some for an increase in numbers. That is not the case.

http://www.pewforum.org/fact-sheet/changing-attitudes-on-gay-marriage/

http://www.norc.org/NewsEventsPubli...n-acceptance-of-homosexuality-gss-report.aspx

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tan...sex-marriage-and-acceptance-of-homosexuality/

And, you have a lot of Christian men decrying homosexuality in public, but accepting, with passion, a certain type of homosexuality in private. Sinners

 

[m52nickerson]

And, you have a lot of Christian men decrying homosexuality in public, but accepting, with passion, a certain type of homosexuality in private. Sinners

We call them folks hypocrites. There is a long and glorious tradition of them in religion.

 

[Devout Pessimist]

No way. There are always going to be religious people who have issues with homosexuals (usually not hot lesbians though, conservative guys love hot lesbian porn after all), and guys who were molested by pedophiles as children are going to hold that trauma against gay guys who are interested in grown men. Generally though, the attitude toward homosexuals is light years ahead of when I went to high school in the 80's and 90's, where nobody would dare admit that they were gay. Now you have kids being openly gay and dating in high school. And you never used to encounter openly flaming gay dudes working in square places of business like Marriott hotels, like you do all over the country now. The world has changed, especially with people under 30, where most people (who don't look at the world through bronze age colored glasses) see being gay as a non-issue.