So this is your logic: I say that you can't properly train for multiple attackers, and the best course of action is seeking to flee,
You say that's false, and of course someone can handle multiple attackers.
I ask for any evidence of this, you can't provide any.
I provide a generic scenario, and ask how could multiple attackers be handled, but you claim it's too artificial so you won't even respond. You say it's too silly.
You say real life is too dynamic to have any sort of plan. But then you claim you can be trained to do so?
So which one is it? Real life is so dynamic you can never have a plan or training? Or you can be trained to handle multiple attackers?
Oh yeah, I forgot about all the ad hominems you throw in, the last vestiges of a moron that has CLEARLY been hit in the head one too many times. I guess it is true that boxers get brain damage - you're living proof!
The reality is that a situation where a person would be in a 1v1 confrontation, or Nv1 confrontation, is already exceedingly rare unless you're still in high school or something. If you happen to live in a bad neighborhood, or are confronted by a mugger, the greatest possibly is that your attacker will be armed.
So training to defend in a multiple unarmed attacker scenario is stupid. The odds are stacked against you, and you have nothing to gain. Unless, of course, you are in a high school fight and want to show how tough you are.
Or will you also argue that you are badass enough to take on multiple, armed attackers too? 3 guys with knives? That's a normal day for n.diazismylife "Jack Reacher" 1999.
Do you think Jack Reacher is based on a true story?
I saw it happen live several times back in the late 80's/early 90's. You want to know what was funny? It always went down similar to Jack Reacher's story. I will describe the scenario.
In those days where I was gangs were still a thing so multiple attackers/opponent scenarios were not uncommon, and if you were w/ a large enough group of people (3 - 4+) you would be considered a legal target for plenty of gang punks. There was this huge Chinese guy (think of Enson Inoue build, the guy was a [American] football player and solid power puncher, little bit chubby so he looked like a giant Chinese baby) that would sometimes hang w/ us. His thing was to get into situations where he would get himself surrounded by 5-6 guys. *
Sidenote - to be fair, I only ever saw him do this while he had us savages in tow* So he'd get surrounded, and then go into this spiel, a real act where he'd start to play victim and rant louder and louder over the course of the monologue, and THEY
ALWAYS LISTENED. As he would be delivering the spiel/pitch he would also be slowly taking out his belt and wrapping it around his right fist, and this would happen in a David Blaine/Copperfield fashion - they would always listen to the pitch because in ways he would feed their ego and he'd pull a funky misdirection w/ the belt and they would never clue-in/get set off by the fact that he was wrapping his hand. The first time I saw it happen I was amazed.
Then, out of the blue, he would put down the biggest guy with one shot. Turn to another and repeat, turn to another and repeat. This part of this situation happens in 4 - 7 seconds. After the first 3 went down the "realities of the situation" would change for any of the remaining guys; the guy they thought they wanted to fight was not the same guy they wanted to fight.
Now yes, to one of your points, the remaining guys (including any affiliated onlookers) would not run for the hills and flee, but they would flee from him and attack the rest of us because he personally had broken them and they wanted "easier" prey, and "they" always had a numbers advantage on us as a group; usually someone in their ranks would run go fecth another batch of guys and we'd end up having to pull a
Warriors and book it. It pretty much happened the same way each time. Sure there were plenty of little differences and idiosyncrasies between each of the instances, but overall this was a set-piece performance that he could pull off almost at will
under the right circumstances.
