Soo hype son!

Who else thought this thread was gonna be about some Korean fighter
 
Fatal Catro said:
At what weight would you want them to fight, and would there be a belt involved ?
Click to expand...
Belt does not matter, weight does not matter, this fight will sell more than anything with Tony or Khabib’s name on it.
 
Just rewatched round 1 of the Lee/Ferg fight. I think Tony is going to get a serious beating in this fight. Similar to the Khabib / Barboza fight.
 
TheRassler said:
Belt does not matter, weight does not matter, this fight will sell more than anything with Tony or Khabib’s name on it.
Click to expand...
Who gives a fuck about what numbers it does, why does that matter to you ?.
If they strip him and there is no belt on the line, then sure those two can fight each other until retirement.
 
Fatal Catro said:
Who gives a fuck about what numbers it does, why does that matter to you ?.
If they strip him and there is no belt on the line, then sure those two can fight each other until retirement.
Click to expand...
Umm because this is a pay per view sport and business model, the numbers are what the fans want to see the most, not some piece of gold that literally isn’t worth much after a fighter retires. Ask Tim Sylvia how much his HW belt is worth these days in retirement.

Who gives a fuck about a bunch of nerds crying over some guy not defending instead of giving us the fights we’d rather see, money fights.
 
TheRassler said:
Umm because this is a pay per view sport and business model, the numbers are what the fans want to see the most, not some piece of gold that literally isn’t worth much after a fighter retires. Ask Tim Sylvia how much his HW belt is worth these days in retirement.

Who gives a fuck about a bunch of nerds crying over some guy not defending instead of giving us the fights we’d rather see, money fights.
Click to expand...
But that's the contradiction, if the belt doesn't matter then strip Conor and have Tony and khabib fight for the real belt. The ufc just likes to promote conor as the champ so they let him keep it.
honestly I wouldn't care if Conor Nate 3 headlined over Tony/khabib winner vs Tyron/whoever winner super fight with both belts on the line
 
Kirin said:
It's a shame both of these guys have to face each other first and one of them is getting knocked out of contention; if mc-g wasn't such a coward and the ufc didn't ride his nuts, he should have had to face both of them. Instead, we got that circus "boxing" match, and now canner made enough money to retire if he so chooses.
Click to expand...
McPhail made sure they’d weed themselves out so he’d only had to fight one of them...and even then he’s still running
 
Big McLargeHuge said:
But that's the contradiction, if the belt doesn't matter then strip Conor and have Tony and khabib fight for the real belt. The ufc just likes to promote conor as the champ so they let him keep it.
honestly I wouldn't care if Conor Nate 3 headlined over Tony/khabib winner vs Tyron/whoever winner super fight with both belts on the line
Click to expand...
The belt is just a marketing tool used to sell more PPV’s, doesn’t necessarily mean you’re the best fighter in the world at that weight class. Since there are other fighters from different organizations and different belts for those organizations, it’s all a marketing ploy. What matters the most is taking the biggest fights for the biggest paydays, because after it’s all said and done, those belts aren’t worth much in the long term after a fighter is long retired, go ask Tim Sylvia or any other retired ufc champion from 15-20 years ago.
 
Workaholic said:
Until the cage door locks as far as I'm concerned this fight isn't happening

YOU WON'T HURT ME AGAIN UFC
Click to expand...
This,
The hype is too real to be so disappointed by kebab missing the fight for any random problem
 
So close so many times - jus bring em on!

 
Last edited:
TheRassler said:
The belt is just a marketing tool used to sell more PPV’s, doesn’t necessarily mean you’re the best fighter in the world at that weight class. Since there are other fighters from different organizations and different belts for those organizations, it’s all a marketing ploy. What matters the most is taking the biggest fights for the biggest paydays, because after it’s all said and done, those belts aren’t worth much in the long term after a fighter is long retired, go ask Tim Sylvia or any other retired ufc champion from 15-20 years ago.
Click to expand...
I honestly think we're on the same page with what we think.
You accept that the belt is basically meaningless (which it is) and I wish it wasn't
 
Big McLargeHuge said:
I honestly think we're on the same page with what we think.
You accept that the belt is basically meaningless (which it is) and I wish it wasn't
Click to expand...
so you agree that Conor vs Nate 3 makes the most sense since it brings in the most money, and with the belt on the line, it will surpass anything Tony or Khabib can bring to the table.
 
TheRassler said:
so you agree that Conor vs Nate 3 makes the most sense since it brings in the most money, and with the belt on the line, it will surpass anything Tony or Khabib can bring to the table.
Click to expand...
Yes, in short term money based on a single event. What it causes long term who knows.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,237,082
Messages
55,466,517
Members
174,786
Latest member
plasterby

Share this page

Back
Top