- Joined
- Feb 21, 2010
- Messages
- 5,358
- Reaction score
- 29
Who said that? Proust?
Not sure. The best I can find is a baseball player named Lefty Gomez.
Who said that? Proust?
Upon thinking about it, I think I agree with @Strange King that he was not actually mentally disabled. For one, he was able to get a driver's license. For another, that just seemed to be a cover story by the Evil Aunt, when the reality was that being abducted and abused and for years on end fucked him up psychologically.
One could perhaps argue that the end result was the same--a fractured mind--but I don't think there was any baseline mental deficiency that existed before he was taken.
As I said earlier to Ruthless, I think at the end of the day his silence was just a plot device designed to allow the story to play out, but one whose basis seems flimsy.
He talks to Loki under duress at the police department, and he even speaks to Keller when Keller confronts him in the parking lot. Hell, he even talks to the black mother when he asks her to help him. And yet, for some reason he can't manage to eek out a word when Keller asks where the girls are? Why is it that ONLY THEN he loses the power of speech?
Think about it. It doesn't make sense.
So all that leaves is him somehow having both the strength and the desire to stay silent and protect the Aunt while being tortured, and that to me is equally implausible.
Through a stroke of luck only though, right?
Loki goes to visit Holly Jones because he finds Alex. And while he's there, he notices the picture with the husband with the maze necklace, who he discovered in the priest's basement totally on his own without Keller's involvement.
So Keller's actions eventually leads Loki to Holly Jones's place, but not because Keller actually intended for that to happen.
I think for the movie he is now under that evil ladies complete control. Stolkholm syndrome but its unique because there is not alot of info on kids being abused and staying with the torturer. He never once in the whole movie betrays her and is even aloud freedom. Driving, walking the dog and he never thinks about escape. He is loyal to her
Holy smokes. I need to get in on this thread.
So she kidnapped him, imprisoned him, abused him . . . and then later decided that it was okay to just let him go out into the world and live his life, with no fear that he would say anything to anyone?
That also struck me as unlikely.
It jives if he's become complicit over the years.
Yeah, I mean it does seem like that's what the film is trying to say. I'm just saying that it seems far-fetched.
It's why this thread has gone so long. Accepting some stuff as a plot device or straining reason in order to suspend any disbelief.
That's well-said.
I just rewatched next week's choice and was trying to imagine what would drive the conversation in a way this week's entry has enjoyed. After all this activity that thread's gonna be dead in comparison.
Still can't wait to hear people's opinions on it though.
In terms of discussion power, I'm sure Clockwork would've been the top pick. Kubrick always gets people talking.
I'm glad you brought up the part about him having freedom. That also seems strange.
So she kidnapped him, imprisoned him, abused him . . . and then later decided that it was okay to just let him go out into the world and live his life, with no fear that he would say anything to anyone?
That also struck me as unlikely.
Yeah, I mean it does seem like that's what the film is trying to say. I'm just saying that it seems far-fetched.